臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

資料包絡分析法(Data Envelopment Analysis, DEA)是一個可處理多重投入及多重產出的績效評估工具，自從Charnes、Cooper與Rhodes三位學者於1978年提出後，這套方法已廣泛被應用在現實生活中。當使用DEA演算法求受評單位的效率分數時，已存在一個非常根本的問題，即各受評單位，或稱為決策單位元(Decision Making Unit,DMU)透過演算法所求得的各組權重可能差異過大，導致所求得的績效評估或排名資料可能被扭曲，這引發一連串的相關問題，例如：受評單位之間的鑑別度不高、不一致的次序關係過多。
本研究針對已知的投入產出值代入DEA演算法所獲得的權重，進行二階段的集群分析，依照不同的群組來做績效評估。其基本精神是，同樣重視某一評價指標的受評單位去做DEA的績效排名，所得的排名結果將更不會有爭議。且研究的結果確實能改善鑑別度，且當受評單位增多，效果將更為明顯。又雖然透過分群，可提高一些鑑別度，但各群還是有鑑別不出來的受評單位，我們針對各群有效率的DMU，使用正規化權重向量的槪念，使各有效率的DMU能區分高下。對於各群無效率的DMU，我們也使用差額變數分析(Slack Variable Analysis)，指引各無效率的DMU改善的方向。
最後，我們亦舉了二個實際的例子，來比較原始DEA方法的評估結果與本研究所提出之方法的評估結果有何差別，並希望未來能應用到其他不同領域、不同層面的績效評估。

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a tool of performance assessment handling multiple input and output production correspondences. Since Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes (1978) presented this methodology, it has broadly been applied in real life. Nevertheless, DEA has an extremely fundamental problem that each set of favorable weights maximizing each DMU under consideration could be diverse when we use DEA to obtain relatively efficient score of each DMU. This problem may cause performance assessment or ranking acquired through mathematical programming technique of DEA to be twisted seriously. Furthermore, a series of related issues such as lack of discrimination and inconsistent orders among DMUs are involved in this basis problem.
This study proposes a novel algorithm to rank DMUs that have similar weights. The algorithm performs two-stage cluster analysis with weights obtained by DEA algorithm, and ranks DMUs of each group generated by cluster analysis. The outcome proves that the proposed method can improve the discrimination because of removing outliers. Although discrimination advances through cluster analysis, there are still indiscriminable DMUs in each group. We focus on efficient DMUs in each group and make them differentiable by the concept of normalizing the weight vectors. On the other aspect, we provide inefficient DMUs in each group with improvable directions by the method of slack variable analysis.
Practical examples are also presented to compare the original DEA method with the proposed method and illustrate that it is applicable and useful to other applications of different fields.

目 錄

中文摘要................................................i
英文摘要................................................ii
誌謝....................................................iv
目錄....................................................v
表目錄..................................................vii
圖目錄..................................................ix
第一章 緒論............................................1
1.1 研究背景與動機.................................1
1.2 研究目的與步驟.................................2
1.3 研究論文架構槪述...............................3
第二章 文獻回顧........................................5
2.1 相關文獻.......................................5
第三章 新評估程序-結合資料包絡分析法與集群分析.........7
3.1 資料包絡分析法(DEA)............................7
3.1.1 DEA理論..................................7
3.1.2 DEA模型..................................8
3.1.3 現有方法之評論...........................11
3.2 集群分析(CA)...................................14
3.2.1 CA理論...................................14
3.2.2 標準化轉換與相似性.......................15
3.2.3 階層與非階層分群方法.....................16
3.2.4 兩階段集群分析...........................18
3.3 新評估程序的特色...............................19
3.4 新評估程序的架構...............................19
3.5 針對新評估程序的結果做更進一步分析.............20
3.5.1 鑑別有效率的DMU..........................21
3.5.2 差額變數分析.............................27
第四章 原始的DEA評估程序與新評估程序之比較-以全球著名商學院為例..................................................31
4.1 原始DEA方法的結果..............................31
4.2 新評估程序的結果...............................35
4.3 針對新評估程序的結果做更進一步的分析...........39
4.3.1 正規化權重向量...........................39
4.3.2 差額變數分析.............................40
第五章 原始的DEA評估程序與新評估程序之比較-以中國二十八個城市為例................................................42
5.1 原始DEA方法的結果..............................42
5.2 新評估程序的結果...............................45
5.3 針對新評估程序的結果做更進一步的分析...........50
5.3.1 正規化權重向量...........................50
5.3.2 差額變數分析.............................51
第六章 結論與建議......................................55
6.1 結論...........................................55
6.2 未來研究之建議.................................55
參考文獻................................................57

參考文獻

[1] 梁志豪，「以DEA模型評估本國銀行經營與規模績效之研究」，國立清華大學經濟研究所碩士論文，民國90年。
[2] 吳偉立，「教學醫院醫療部門之績效評估-資料包絡法觀點」，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文，民國91年。
[3] 陳禹廷，「我個產險業經營績效之研究-資料包絡分析法之應用」，朝陽科技大學保險金融管理研究所碩士論文，民國92年。
[4] 黃雅琪，「DEA方法鑑別度之改善─以全球商學院之績效評估為例」，國立交通大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，民國92年。
[5] 黃彥豪，「利用自組織映射圖網路於區域雨型分類之研究」，國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文，民國92年。
[6] 高強，黃旭男，Sueyoshi，管理績效評估-資料包絡分析法，台北：華泰文化事業公司，2003年。
[7] 黃俊英，多變量分析，台北：華泰文化事業公司，2003年。
[8] 張紹動，張紹評，林秀娟，SPSS For Windows多變量統計分析，台北：文魁資訊股份有限公司，2004年。
[9] A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision makingunits, European Journal of Operational Research 2 (1978) 429-444.
[10] A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and B. Golany, A Developmental Study of Data Envelopment Analysis in Measuring The Maintenance Units in the U.S. Air Forces, The Annals of Operations Research V2 (1985) 95-112.
[11] A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper and S. Li, Using Data Envelopment Analysis to Evaluate Efficiency in the Economic Performance of Chinese Cities, Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. V23 (1989) 325-344.
[12] G. Punj and D. W. Stewart, Cluster Analysis in Markting Research: Review and Suggestions for Application, Journal of Marketing Research, May (1983) 134-148.
[13] J. Boles, N. Donthu and R. Lohtia, Salesperson Evaluation Using Relative Performance Efficiency: The Application of Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of Personal Selling & sales Management, Volume 15, Number3 (Summer 1995) 31-49.
[14] J. D. Cummins, S. Tennyson, M. A. Weiss, Onsolidation and Efficiency in the US Life Insurance Industry, Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 23 (1999) 325-357.
[15] L. Angulo-MEZA and M. P. E. Lines, Review of methods for Increasing Discrimination in Data Envelopment Analysis, Annals of Operations Research 116 (2002) 225-242.
[16] M. J. Farrel, The measurement of productive efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A120 (1957) 253-281.
[17] P. Anderson, and NC. Peterson, A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis, Management Science 39 (1993) 1261-1264.
[18] R. H. Green, J. R. Doyle, W. D. Cook, Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation, European Journal of Operational research 90 (1996) 461-472.
[19] R. Ramanathan, Comparative Risk Assessment of energy supply technologies: a Data Envelopment Analysis approach, Energy 26 (2001) 197-203.
[20] L. Scharge, Optimization Modeling with LINGO (3rd edition), LINDO System, Inc (1999).
[21] T. Obata and H. Ishii, A method for discriminating efficient candidates with ranked voting data, European Journal of Operational Research 151 (2003) 233-237.