臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來，社會關係在經濟活動中的作用和影響越來越成為研究熱點。經濟活動中雙方或者多方之間的關係對事件的影響不斷成為專家學者的研究命題。校友關係作為一種重要的社會關係，具有很大的潛在研究價值。同時，審計品質的相關研究涉及面廣，研究角度深入且廣泛，但關於社會關係和審計品質之間的影響研究還略顯不足。在中國這樣一個注重“人情”的社會中，校友關係對於審計品質是否會有影響又會是怎樣的影響等一系列問題是非常值得探討的。
本文選取了社會關係中的校友關係作為研究對象，回顧了國內外學者對於社會關係和審計品質的文獻研究，提出了校友關係會對審計品質有影響的相關假設，並對校友關係對審計品質的影響做了更深入的分析。本文以中國A股上市公司為樣本，通過理論分析和實證分析，對提出的假設進行檢驗。研究結果為（1）驗證了校友關係確實會影響審計品質，且為不利影響。（2）政府監管會抑制校友關係對審計品質的影響，弱化校友關係效應。（3）審計費用與審計品質正相關，但校友關係會破壞這種正相關性，過高的審計費用可能是管理層與會計師達成共謀的成本。最後，本文根據研究結果提出了一些研究中的不足和未來如何進一步研究的想法，同時也為實務中如何在審計中保持更高的獨立性和政府機關如何監管提供了一些思路。

Recently, the research on the social relations in economic activities has gradually and increasingly became an academic research hot spot. More and more scholars develop their studies on the impact of the cases with relationship between two parties or multiple parties in economic activities. School ties, as one specific important social relations have splendid values to explore. At the same time, audit quality has always been a widely concerned issue in academic and practical circles. The study about how to improve audit quality has a long history and covers a wide range of aspects, but the research on the impact between social relations and audit quality is still slightly inadequate. In China, a society that attaches many importance to “interpersonal relation”, it is worth discussing whether the social relations will affect the audit quality.
This paper chooses the school ties in social relations as the research object. In the following section, I review the literature research on social relations and audit quality by scholars at home and abroad, put forward the hypothesis that school ties will affect audit quality, and make a more in-depth analysis on the impact of school ties and audit quality. After theoretical and empirical analysis, this paper validates the hypothesis based on the sample of A-share listed companies in China. The results show that (1) School ties will affect audit quality, and it has a negative impact.(2) Government regulation can restrain the impact of school ties to audit quality and weaken the effect of school ties. (3)Audit fees are positively correlated with audit quality, but school ties may undermine this positive correlation. Excessive audit fees may be the cost of collusion between management and accountants. Finally, at the end of this paper I bring forth some shortcomings when I wrote this paper and offer some proposals on how to do further study in the future. Moreover, I also provide some ideas on how to maintain higher independence in auditing and the supervision of government organs in practice.

中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
第1章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景 1
1.2研究意義和研究目的 2
1.3研究架構 3
1.4研究方法 6
第2章 文獻綜述 6
2.1關於社會關係的文獻綜述 6
2.2關於審計品質的文獻綜述 8
2.3關於社會關係和審計品質的文獻綜述 11
第3章 理論分析和研究假設 12
3.1理論基礎 12
3.1.1社會關係理論 12
3.1.2委託代理理論 13
3.1.3深口袋理論 13
3.1.4 供給與需求理論 14
3.2 理論分析與假設建立 15
第4章 實證研究 18
4.1樣本選取與數據源 18
4.2變數定義和模型構建 19
4.2.1變數解釋 19
4.2.2模型構建 21
第5章 實證分析 22
5.1敘述性分析 22
5.2回歸分析 26
第6章 結論 30
6.1 結論與建議 30
6.2 局限性與展望 32
參考文獻 34

圖目錄
圖 1 論文框架 5
圖 2 是否存在校友關係統計 22

表目錄
表 1 中西方社會關係差異 7
表 2 樣本選取 19
表 3 變數定義 21
表 4 其他變數的敘述性統計 23
表 5 共線性分析 24
表 6 共線性分析 25
表 7 校友關係與審計品質回歸分析 26
表 8 政府監管的調節作用分析 28
表 9 審計品質與審計費用回歸分析 29
表 10 校友關係的調節作用 30

[1] Allen, F. Qian, J., Qian, M. Law, Finance and Economic Growth in China. Journal of Financial Economics. 2005, 77(1), 57–116.
[2] Baber, W.R., Krishnan, J., Zhang, Y. Investor Perceptions of the Earnings Quality Consequences of Hiring an Affiliated Auditor. Review of Accounting Studies. 2014, 19(1), 69–102.
[3] Becker. C. M., DeFond., J. Jiambalvo, K. Subramanyam. The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research. 1998, 15, (1), 1–24
[4] Berkman, H., Cole, R.A., Fu, J. Political Connections and Minority-shareholder Protection: Evidence from Securities-market Regulation in China. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2011, 45(6), 1391–1417.
[5] Brian Uzzi, Ryon Lancaster. Relational Embeddedness and Learning: The Case of Bank Loan Managers and Their Clients. Article Information. 2003, 49(4), 383-399.
[6] Breesc, D., Branson, J. The Effects of Auditor Gender on Audit Quality. The IUP Journal of Accounting Research&Audit Practices. 2009, 8(3/4), 78-107.
[7] Bruynseels, L. Cardinaels, E. The audit committee: Management Watchdog or Personal Friend of the CEO. The Accounting Review. 2014, 89(1), 113–145.
[8] Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., Malloy, C. The Small World of Investing: Board Connections and Mutual Fund Returns. Journal of Political Economy. 2008, 116(5), 951–979.
[9] Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., Malloy, C. Sell-side school ties. Journal of Finance. 2010, 65(4), 1409–1437.
[10] Clive, S., Lennox Jeffrey Pittman. Big Five Audits and Accounting Fraud . Contemporary Accounting Research. 2010, 27(1), 209-247.
[11] DeAngelo, L. Auditor Size and Auditor Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 1981, 3(3), 183–199.
[12] Doidge, C., G. A. Karolyi, R. M . Stulz. Why Do Countries Matter So Much for Corporate Governance. Journal of Financial Economics. 2007, 86 (1), 1–39.
[13] Engelberg, E., Gao, P., Parsons, C. A. Friends with Money. Journal of Financial Economics. 2012, 103(1), 169–188.
[14] Granovetter, M. The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2005, 19(1), 33–50.
[15] Hwang, B. H., Kim, S. It Pays to Have Friends. Journal of Financial Economics. 2009, 93(1), 138–158.
[16] H. Gensler, J. Yang. Auditing Standards of the People''s Republic of China. FT Law & Tax Asia Pacific, 1996
[17] Healy, P.M., Wahlen, J.M. A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and Its Implications for Standard Setting. Accounting Horizons. 1999, 13, 365–383.
[18] HongbinLi, LingshengMeng, QianWang, Li-AnZhou. Political Connections, Financing and Firm Performance: Evidence From Chinese Private Firms. 2008, 87(2), 283-299.
[19] Jennifer, J. Jones. Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations. Journal of Accounting Research. 1991, 29(2), 193-228.
[20] Jennifer L.Kao, DonghuiWu, ZhifengYang. Regulations, Earnings Management, and Post-IPO Performance: The Chinese Evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2009, 33, 63-76.
[21] Jeffrey, T. Doyle, Weili Ge, Sarah McVay. Accruals Quality and Internal Control over Financial Reporting. The Accounting Review. 2007, 82 (5), 1141-1170.
[22]Joseph P. H. Fan , T. J. Wong. Do External Auditors Perform a Corporate Governance Role in Emerging Markets? Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Accounting Research. 2005, 43(1), 35-72.
[23] La Porta, R., F. Lopez De Dilanes, A. Shleifer. The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins. Journal of Economic Literature. 2008, 46 (2), 285–332.
[24] Lawrence, J., Abbott, Susan Parker, Gary F. Peters, K. Raghunandan. The Association Between Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit Fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 2003, 22(2), 17-32
[25] Mark S.Granovetter. The Strength of Weak Ties. Social Networks. 1977, 347-367.
[26] Massa, M., Simonov, A. Is College a Focal Point of Investor Life? Review of Finance. 2011, 15(4), 757–797.
[27] Matthijs Kalmijn , Henk Flap. Assortative Meeting and Mating: Unintended Consequences of Organized Settings for Partner Choices. Social Forces. 2001, 79(4), 1289-1312.
[28] McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology. 2001, 27, 415–444.
[29] Michel, Ferrary.Trust and social capital in the regulation of lending activities. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 2003, 31(6), 673-699.
[30] Patricia, M. , Dechow, Richard G. Sloan, Amy, P. Sweeney. Detecting Earnings Management. The Accounting Review. 1995, 70(2), 193-225.
[31] Paul Hribar, Craig Nichols. The Use of Unsigned Earnings Quality Measures in Tests of Earnings Management. Journal of Accounting Research. 2007, 45(5), 1107-1053.
[32] Piotroski, J. , Wong, T. J. Institutions and Information Environment of Chinese Listed Firms. Chapter in NBER book Capitalizing China. Joseph Fan and Randall Morck, editors. 2013, 201 – 242.
[33] Phillip, T. Lamoreaux. Does PCAOB Inspection Access Improve Audit Quality? An Examination of Foreign Firms Listed in the United States. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2016, 61, 313-337.
[34] Rani Hoitash, Ariel Markelevich, Charles A. Barragato. Auditor Fees and Audit Quality. Managerial Auditing Journal. 2007, 22(8), 761-786.
[35] Willenborg, M., McKeown, J. Going-concern Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2001, 30(3), 279–313.
[36] Yuyan Guan , Lixin Su, Donghui Wu, Zhifeng Yang. Do school ties between auditors and client executives influence audit outcomes? Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2016, 61, 506-525.
[37] ZP Hao. Regulation and Organization of Accountants in China Accounting. Auditing and Accountability Journal. 1999, 12, 286 – 302.
[38] 邊燕傑, 丘海雄. 企業的社會資本及其功效 中國社會科學 2000, (2), 87-99.
[39] 陳關亭, 蘭淩. 操控性應計利潤審計品質的實證比較 審計與經濟研究 2004,（4）,16-19.
[40] 陳靜. 政治成本視域下重污染企業真實盈餘管理研究--———基於霧霾規制頒佈的准自然實驗考察 會計之友 2018,（11）,51-56
[41] 丁竹. 關係網絡、審計任期與審計品質 科學經濟社會 2017, (4), 26-34
[42] 郭婉. 金融危機背景下的政治成本與盈餘管理——來自中國電力供熱業上市公司的證據 綠色財會 2014, (3), 52-56
[43] 黃光國,胡先縉. 人情與面子——中國人的權力遊戲 領導薈萃 2005,（7）, 162-166.
[44] 劉濤, 謝水園. 獨立審計品質保證機制中政府的作用研究 學術論壇 2013,（7）, 170-172.
[45] 劉峰, 許菲. 風險導向型審計·法律風險·審計品質──兼論“五大”在我國審計市場的行為 會計研究 2002,（2）, 21-28.
[46] 劉峰, 周福源. 國際四大意味著高審計品質嗎 ——基於會計穩健性角度的檢驗會計研究 2007 , (3) , 79-94.
[47] 齊萱. 上市公司擔保資訊披露現狀、問題及對策——基於中國證監會處罰公告和交易所公開譴責的實證分析 財會通訊 2016,（1）, 85-88.
[48] 孫坤. 獨立審計品質保證論 山東財經大學博士學位論文 2003.
[49] 王敏. 關於審計品質替代指標有效性的研究 經濟研究導刊 2015,（22）, 105-107.
[50] 魏豔莉,李珺. 淺析中國社會的人情關係 文化與探索 2017, (4), 222.
[51] 吳偉榮,李晶晶. 校友關係影響審計品質研究—基於權利中心度和關係親密度的證據 中國軟科學 2018, (8), 105-116.
[52] 漆江娜，陳慧霖，張陽. 事務所規模·品牌·價格與審計品質——國際“四大”中國審計市場收費與品質研究 審計研究 2004,（3）, 59-65.
[53] 唐躍軍. 審計收費、審計師變更與意見購買 財經理論與實踐 2009,（5）,57-61
[54] 易琮. 審計意見類型能反映審計品質嗎？ 理論研究 2004,(8),32-33.
[55] 尹雯，溫靜. 審計意見類型和審計品質分析——為何“非標” 審計與理財 2015,（1）,44-45.
[56] 張蒙晰. 會計師事務所規模與審計品質實證研究 現代行銷 2018,（3）,110-111.
[57] 張宏亮,文挺. 審計品質替代指標有效性檢驗與篩選 審計研究 2016,(4),67-75.
[58] 趙泉民,李怡. 關係網絡與中國鄉村社會的合作經濟—基於社會資本視角農業經濟問題.2007,(8),40-46.
[59] 周蘭，耀友福. 媒體監督、政府干預與審計品質 北京社會科學 2015,（5）,26-42.
[60] 張文耀. 我國資本市場會計監管體系實施效果的博弈分析 人文雜誌 2009, (5), 85-90.