|
Abstract This study first examines the elements required for Low-carbon buildings and then observes the impact of each element on the actual operation-oriented aspects of the current operation of the construction industry. Finally, using the academic building of a science and technology university as an example, we discuss the possibility of applying construction methods for low-carbon buildings by comparing changes in carbon emissions under different construction methods. Different construction methods and materials have different carbon footprints in the construction of school buildings. This study uses life cycle assessments to observe the number of carbon emissions generated during the construction phase and suggests how to achieve low-carbon buildings and make low-carbon buildings more widely available. The main purposes of this study are: 1. To use CFP-PCR to find out the hot spots for reducing carbon in school buildings; 2. Put forward strategies for reducing carbon in buildings; 3. Apply these strategies to the construction industry.
In this study, the “case study method” is used to discuss the relevant carbon emission data, and the “in-depth interview method” is used as the study method for formulating low-carbon building strategies. The results of the study indicate that the provision of openings in the basement has the effect of reducing the amount of reinforced concrete, reducing the placement of ventilation equipment, and introducing natural light to reduce the amount of electricity used, thereby reducing the carbon footprint. In the initial stages of design and during construction, adequate changes in the design of certain parts and construction methods can significantly reduce overall building carbon emissions by more than 37%. This study proposes data and demonstrates with examples of the correlation between increasing building openings and reducing concrete usage and carbon emissions. This will enable decision makers at the beginning of project planning to adopt designs and construction methods that have lower environmental impact costs in the life cycle, which also allows them to take note of the practicality of CFP-PCR in carbon footprint exploration.
Keywords: Carbon Footprint, CFP-PCR, Low-Carbon Buildings, School Buildings
|