臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

專案管理現今在國際間或是在臺灣逐漸受到重視，也隨著全球化競爭激烈，企業對產品上市的速度要求越來越快，故現在許多企業開始相信實施專案管理能夠帶來更多的好處。鑑於此現象的產生，本研究欲了解專案管理的學術論文發展軌跡，藉由系統性地整理理論發展過程，讓學者在研究時能快速地掌握專案管理發展，以便延續該領域之研究。本研究使用成長曲線分析檢視專案管理發展的階段，也運用g-index找出專案管理研究領域中具有影響力的期刊及學者，研究的核心是使用主路徑分析方法，分別使用Local Main Path、Global Main Path、Multiple Global Main Path及Global Key Route四種分析方法。
在研究結果發現使用四種研究方法所分析出的文獻有大量的相似性。在Local Main Path與Global Main Path中與Global Key Route發展類似，而Multiple Global Main Path則歸納出「資源限制下的專案排程」、「動態環境下的專案管理」、「專案人力資源管理」與「專案與知識管理」四大領域。本研究針對專案管理學術論文發展有著完整地描述理論的發展軌跡及方向，提供想深入探討專案管理的研究者，能夠快速地找尋專案管理學術論文中重要之研究論文。

Nowadays, project management has received more and more attention not only in Taiwan but also in the world. Due to the intensive competition of global market, the time to market of products must be shortened. Therefore, many enterprises believe that the implementation of project management can bring more benefits to them. Based on this situation, this study focuses on exploring the development trajectory of project management literature and tries to shed some lights for the future research.
According to the results, scholars who want to deeply investigate into the topic of project management could easily find the related classic literature. Regarding to research method, we use growth curve analysis to examine the development stages of project management. Besides, we also adopt g-index to rank the most influential journals and authors in project management discipline. We apply Main Path Analysis Method as the core of study, which includes the Local Main Path, Global Main Path, Multiple Global Main Path and Global Key Route.
The research findings show that using four main path analysis methods obtain similar results in main path. In the Local Main Path and Global Main path, the development trajectory is similar to that of the Multiple Global Main Path. In the Multiple Global Main Path, this study categories project management development into four sub-topics, including project scheduling under resource constrains, the dynamic project management and overlapping process, human resource management of project management, and the knowledge management of project management.

目錄
摘要 i
英文摘要 iii
誌謝 v
目錄 vi
表目錄 viii
圖目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 引用分析 (Citation Analysis) 4
第二節 主路徑分析 5
第三節 h-index與g-index 5
第四節 成長曲線分析 (Growth Curve Analysis) 6
第五節 專案管理 8
壹、 專案管理的發展 8
貳、 專案管理的特性 10
參、 專案管理的應用領域 11
第三章 研究方法 12
第一節 研究架構 12
第二節 資料來源 13
第三節 關鍵字檢索 14
第四節 期刊與作者基本統計 14
第五節 g-index 15
第六節 成長曲線分析 16
第七節 主路徑分析 17
第八節 Main Path 277與Pajek 21
第四章 研究結果 23
第一節 期刊與作者基本統計 23
壹、 期刊基本統計 23
貳、 作者基本統計 25
第二節 專案管理學術論文成長曲線分析 29
第三節 專案管理學術論文主路徑分析 30
壹、 Local Main Path與Global Main Path 30
貳、 Multiple Global Main Path 33
參、 Global Key-Route 44
第五章 研究結論 49
第一節 專案管理學術論文軌跡總結 49
第二節 研究建議與貢獻 51
參考文獻 53

參考文獻
Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2010). hg-index: A new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h-and g-indices. Scientometrics, 82(2), 391-400.
Assad, A. A., & Wasil, E. A. (1986). Project management using a microcomputer. Computers & Operations Research, 13(2), 231-260.
Aubry, M., Müller, R., & Glückler, J. (2011). Exploring PMOs through community of practice theory. Project Management Journal, 42(5), 42-56. doi: 10.1002/pmj.20259
Batagelj, V. (2003). Efficient algorithms for citation network analysis: Department of Theoretical Computer Science, University of Ljubljana.
Bresnen, M., Goussevskaia, A., & Swan, J. (2004). Embedding new management knowledge in project-based organizations. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1535-1555. doi: 10.1177/0170840604047999
Browning, T. R. (2009). The many views of a process: Toward a process architecture framework for product development processes. Systems Engineering, 12(1), 69-90.
Browning, T. R. (2010). On the alignment of the purposes and views of process models in project management. Journal of Operations Management, 28(4), 316-332.
Browning, T. R., & Ramasesh, R. V. (2007). A survey of activity network‐based process models for managing product development projects. Production and Operations Management, 16(2), 217-240.
Browning, T. R., & Yassine, A. A. (2010a). A random generator of resource-constrained multi-project network problems. Journal of Scheduling, 13(2), 143-161.
Browning, T. R., & Yassine, A. A. (2010b). Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling: Priority rule performance revisited. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(2), 212-228.
Chandrasekaran, A., & Mishra, A. (2012). Task design, team context, and psychological safety: An empirical analysis of R&D projects in high technology organizations. Production and Operations Management, 21(6), 977-996.
Chen, K. H. (2004). The construction of the Taiwan humanities citation index. Online Information Review, 28(6), 410-419.
Cho, J. H., & Kim, Y. D. (1997). A simulated annealing algorithm for resource constrained project scheduling problems. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48(7), 736-744.
Collyer, S., & Warren, C. (2009). Project management approaches for dynamic environments. International Journal of Project Management, 27(4), 355-364. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.04.004
Collyer, S., Warren, C., Hemsley, B., & Stevens, C. (2010). Aim, fire, aim—Project planning styles in dynamic environments. Project Management Journal, 41(4), 108-121.
Davidian, M., & Giltinan, D. M. (1995). Nonlinear models for repeated measurement data (Vol. 62): CRC Press.
Davidovitch, L., Parush, A., & Shtub, A. (2010). Simulator-based team training to share resources in a matrix structure organization. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(2), 288-300.
De Reyck, B., & Herroelen, W. (1999). The multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem with generalized precedence relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 119(2), 538-556.
De Wit, J., & Herroelen, W. (1990). An evaluation of microcomputer-based software packages for project management. European Journal of Operational Research, 49(1), 102-139.
Dvir, D., Lipovetsky, S., Shenhar, A., & Tishler, A. (1998). In search of project classification: A non-universal approach to project success factors. Research Policy, 27(9), 915-935.
Egghe, L. (2006a). An improvement of the h-index: The g-index. ISSI newsletter, 2(1), 8-9.
Egghe, L. (2006b). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152.
Elmaghraby, S. E. (1995). Activity nets: A guided tour through some recent developments. European Journal of Operational Research, 82(3), 383-408.
Engwall, M. (2003). No project is an island: Linking projects to history and context. Research Policy, 32(5), 789-808. doi: 10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00088-4
Engwall, M., Kling, R., & Werr, A. (2005). Models in action: how management models are interpreted in new product development. R&D Management, 35(4), 427-439.
Foster, N. (1986). Innovation: The attacker's advantage: Summit Books, New York.
Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics, 1(4), 359-375.
Hartmann, S. (1998). A competitive genetic algorithm for resource‐constrained project scheduling. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 45(7), 733-750.
Herroelen, W. (2005). Project scheduling—Theory and practice. Production and Operations Management, 14(4), 413-432.
Herroelen, W., & Leus, R. (2001). On the merits and pitfalls of critical chain scheduling. Journal of Operations Management, 19(5), 559-577.
Herroelen, W., & Leus, R. (2004). Robust and reactive project scheduling: a review and classification of procedures. International Journal of Production Research, 42(8), 1599-1620.
Herroelen, W., & Leus, R. (2005). Identification and illumination of popular misconceptions about project scheduling and time buffering in a resource-constrained environment. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(1), 102-109.
Hirsch, E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569.
Ho, J. C., Saw, E. C., Lu, Y. Y., & Liu, J. S. (2014). Technological barriers and research trends in fuel cell technologies: A citation network analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 66-79.
Hummon, N. P., & Dereian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11(1), 39-63.
Ika, L. A. (2009). Project success as a topic in project management journals. Project Management Journal, 40(4), 6-19.
Kerzner, H. (1989). System project management: A case study at the IRS. Journal of Systems Management, 40(1), 7-9.
Kerzner, H. (2013). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling: John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
Killen, C. P., Jugdev, K., Drouin, N., & Petit, Y. (2012). Advancing project and portfolio management research: Applying strategic management theories. International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 525-538. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.12.004
Kwak, Y. H., & Anbari, F. T. (2009). Analyzing project management research: Perspectives from top management journals. International Journal of Project Management, 27(5), 435-446.
Lackman, M. (1987). Controlling the project development cycle: Part 3-Tool for successful project management. Journal of Systems Management, 38(2), 16-29.
LeóN, H. C., Farris, J. A., Letens, G., & Hernandez, A. (2013). An analytical management framework for new product development processes featuring uncertain iterations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 30(1), 45-71.
Lee, J. K., & Kim, Y. D. (1996). Search heuristics for resource constrained project scheduling. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47(5), 678-689.
Levardy, V., & Browning, T. R. (2009). An adaptive process model to support product development project management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 56(4), 600-620.
Lin, J., Chai, K. H., Brombacher, A. C., & Wong, Y. S. (2009). Optimal overlapping and functional interaction in product development. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), 1158-1169. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.030
Lin, J., Chai, K. H., Wong, Y. S., & Brombacher, A. C. (2008). A dynamic model for managing overlapped iterative product development. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), 378-392. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.12.022
Lin, J., Qian, Y., Cui, W., & Miao, Z. (2010). Overlapping and communication policies in product development. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(3), 737-750. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.040
Liu, J. S., & Lu, Y. Y. (2012). An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 528-542.
Liu, J. S., Lu, Y. Y., Lu, W. M., & Lin, J. Y. (2013a). Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega, 41(1), 3-15.
Liu, J. S., Lu, Y. Y., Lu, W. M., & Lin, J. Y. (2013b). A survey of DEA applications. Omega, 41(5), 893-902.
Müller, R., Glückler, J., & Aubry, M. (2013). A relational typology of project management offices. Project Management Journal, 44(1), 59-76. doi: 10.1002/pmj.21321
Meyer, P. S., Yung, J. W., & Ausubel, J. H. (1999). A primer on logistic growth and substitution: The mathematics of the Loglet Lab software. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 61(3), 247-271.
Nieto, M., Lopéz, F., & Cruz, F. (1998). Performance analysis of technology using the S curve model: The case of digital signal processing (DSP) technologies. Technovation, 18(6), 439-457.
Peritz, B. C. (1992). On the objectives of citation analysis: Problems of theory and method. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(6), 448-451.
Petit, Y., & Hobbs, B. (2010). Project portfolios in dynamic environments: Sources of uncertainty and sensing mechanisms. Project Management Journal, 41(4), 46-58. doi: 10.1002/pmj.20201
Pich, M. T., Loch, C. H., & Meyer, A. D. (2002). On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Science, 48(8), 1008-1023. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1008.163
Priestley, J. H., & Pearsall, W. H. (1922). Growth studies. II. An interpretation of some growth-curves. Annals of Botany(2), 239-250.
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
Rauniar, R., Doll, W., Rawski, G., & Hong, P. (2008). The role of heavyweight product manager in new product development. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(2), 130-154.
Reed, L. J., & Pearl, R. (1927). On the summation of logistic curves. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 90(4), 729-746.
Reiss, G. (1995). Project management demystified: Today's tools and techniques: E & FN Spon, London.
Sapolsky, H. M. (1972). The Polaris system development: Harvard University Press Cambridge, Mass.
Schwalbe, K. (2010). Information Technology: Project Management: Cengage Learning, Boston.
Scott-Young, C., & Samson, D. (2008). Project success and project team management: Evidence from capital projects in the process industries. Journal of Operations Management, 26(6), 749-766.
Shenhar, A. J. (1993). From low‐to high‐tech project management. R&D Management, 23(3), 199-214.
Shenhar, A. J. (2001). One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science, 47(3), 397-414.
Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (1996). Toward a typological theory of project management. Research Policy, 25(4), 607-632.
Shenhar, A. J., Dvir, D., & Shulman, Y. (1995). A two-dimensional taxonomy of products and innovations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 12(3), 175-200.
Silva, L. C., & Costa, A. (2013). Decision model for allocating human resources in information system projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31(1), 100-108.
Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library trends, 30(1), 83-106.
Stukel, T. A. (1988). Generalized Logistic models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(402), 426-731.
Unger, B. N., Gemünden, H. G., & Aubry, M. (2012). The three roles of a project portfolio management office: Their impact on portfolio management execution and success. International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 608-620.
Vanhoucke, M. (2012). Measuring the efficiency of project control using fictitious and empirical project data. International Journal of Project Management, 30(2), 252-263. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.05.006
Williams, T. (2008). How do organizations learn lessons from projects - And do they? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(2), 248-266. doi: 10.1109/tem.2007.912920
Zhang, H. (2011). Two schools of risk analysis: A review of past research on project risk. Project Management Journal, 42(4), 5-18.
Zwikael, O., & Unger-Aviram, E. (2010). HRM in project groups: The effect of project duration on team development effectiveness. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 413-421.