跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.54) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/01/12 15:43
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:楊登凱
研究生(外文):YANG,TENG-KAI
論文名稱:導航螺旋刀放射治療鼻咽癌之治療計畫品質在設定照野寬度與調控因子參數之探討
論文名稱(外文):Investigation of Modulation Factor and Field Width on the Treatment Plan Quality in Tomotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Cancer
指導教授:林招膨林招膨引用關係
指導教授(外文):LIN,JAO-PENG
口試委員:林招膨游澄清陳渙東
口試委員(外文):LIN,JAO-PENGYU,CHENG-CHINGCHEN,HUAN-TUNG
口試日期:2016-06-13
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:元培醫事科技大學
系所名稱:醫學影像暨放射技術系碩士班
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:醫學技術及檢驗學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:53
中文關鍵詞:螺旋刀調變因子照野寬度鼻咽癌
外文關鍵詞:Tomotherapymodulation factorfield widthNasopharyngeal Cancer
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:476
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:34
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
導航螺旋刀又稱為「電腦斷層治療機」,正如同電腦斷層掃描儀掃描方式來給予劑量交付,所以在製作放射治療計畫規劃時有幾種特別的參數設定,分別為照野寬度(field width, FW)、調變因子(modulation factor, MF)與螺距(pitch),本研究主要為探討照野寬度與調變因子參數設定對於導航螺旋刀治療鼻咽癌電腦治療計畫品質的影響。材料方法以擬人形假體 (RANDO® Alderson)模擬臨床鼻咽癌病患治療靶體積與危急器官位置,並進行相同的最佳化疊代次數演算與相同的治療靶體積與危急器官權重,且另一個重要的關鍵為治療靶體積至少要有95 % 包覆性。僅改變不同照野寬度(FW = 1, 2,5, 5 cm)與不同調變因子(MF =1.0 ~ 5.0),每0.2為一個間隔)之參數設定,進行放射治療電腦計畫最佳化疊代次數演算,共設計63個組合放射治療計畫,並分析與比較其劑量分布、治療時間、劑量交付之品質驗證。
研究結果顯示使用1公分照野寬度可以更明顯減少危急器官所接受的劑量(p < 0.0001)。另外要獲得可接受的放射治療計畫,其調變因子參數設定最低限制皆為2.0,而調變的最佳速率的上限分別為2.8、3.0、3.4。照射時間與照野寬度有明顯相關,若以照野寬度5公分治療時間比值為1時,照野寬度1公分、2.5公分、5公分在治療時間比值分別為3.7 : 1.7 : 1。導航螺旋刀放射治療鼻咽癌之治療計畫,臨床上若考慮降低危急器官的劑量,則可以使用較小的照野寬度,但需要較長之治療時間。若考慮縮短治療時間,可使用較大的照野寬度,但需要注意治療靶體積外頭腳方向高劑量外擴現象。
Tomotherapy just as computer tomography scanning administered dose delivery, so there are several special parameters set in the treatment planning, respectively according to the field width (FW), modulation factor (MF) and pitch. This study examines the relationship between these parameters and their influence on the quality of the nasopharyngeal cancer treatment plans and their execution time on Tomotherapy. Target volumes and organ at risk (OAR) volumes were delineated on a computerized tomography of a phantom (RANDO® Alderson). Maintaining the weightings of each volume, treatment plans were optimized with a different combination of planning parameters (FW = 1, 2.5, 5 cm. MF =1.0 ~ 5.0 in step at 0.2). Background a key aspect of treatment planning is the coverage of the PTV by the 95% isodose. 63 different plans in terms of FW and MF were prepared. Each plan was analyzed for dose distribution, treatment time, delivery quality assurance and ripple effect.
The results show that using the field width of 1cm can more significantly reduce the of the critical organ doses received (p <0.0001). The ratio between treatment time with different field widths, when treatment time at 5 cm was 1, 1.8 and 4 times at widths of 2.5 cm and 1 cm respectively. Analysis of the quality of the obtained treatment plans allows one to specify the lower limit of the optimum MF for the nasopharyngeal cancer at the level of 2.0. And analysis of individual treatment plan time execution allows one to specify the upper limit of the optimal MF factor at the level of 2.8, 3.0 and 3.4, in the FW = 1, 2,5, 5 cm. Field width could lead to change in treatment time. Combination of small field width and small pitch yielded better planning quality, and increase in treatment time. Treatment time could be shortened with combination of large field width, at expense of increased dose to longitudinal directions.
第一章 緒論
1.1 前言
1.2 研究動機與目的
1.3 研究預期貢獻

第二章 基礎介紹
2.1 鼻咽癌介紹
2.1.1 鼻咽癌流行病學與病因
2.1.2 鼻咽癌之臨床表現與診斷
2.1.3 鼻咽癌之分期
2.1.3 鼻咽癌之治療方式
2.2 放射治療介紹
2.2.1 放射治療流程
2.2.2 輔助模具製作
2.2.3 電腦斷層模擬定位攝影
2.2.4 電腦治療計畫
2.2.5 劑量交付品質保證驗證
2.2.6 治療位置之影像驗證
2.3 導航螺旋刀介紹

第三章 研究材料與方法
3.1 研究設計
3.2 研究材料
3.2.1 侖道假體 (Rando Phantom)
3.2.2 導航螺旋刀系統
3.2.3 游離腔
3.2.4 二維劑量驗證系統與計讀系統
3.2.5 八角形假體 (Octavius Phantom)
3.3 研究方法
3.1.1 模擬定位
3.1.2 電腦斷層模擬定位掃描
3.1.3 靶體積勾畫與處方劑量
3.1.4 危急器官勾畫與耐受劑量限制
3.1.5 電腦治療計畫制定標準
3.1.6 執行放射治療及劑量交付品質保證之劑量測量
3.4 統計分析

第四章 結果
4.1 照野寬度1公分與不同調變因子電腦治療計畫
4.2 照野寬度2.5公分與不同調變因子電腦治療計畫
4.3 照野寬度5公分之與同調變因子電腦治療計畫
4.4 照野寬度1公分、2.5公分與5公分之電腦治療計畫比較

第五章 討論
5.1強度調控放射治療技術比較
5.2照野寬度與調變因子對治療靶體積的影響
5.3照野寬度與調變因子對危急器官之吸收劑量的影響
5.4照野寬度與調變因子對治療時間的影響
5.2照野寬度與調變因子對劑量交付品質驗證的影響

第六章 結論

一、英文部分
1.Binny D., Lancaster C.M., Harris S., Sylvander S.R..“Effects of changing modulation and pitch parameters on tomotherapy delivery quality assurance plans.” J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Sep 8;16(5):5282.

2.Chien Y.C., Chen J.Y., Liu M.Y., Yang H.I., Hsu M.M., Chen C.J., Yang C.S.. “Serologic markers of Epstein-Barr virus infection and nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwanese men. ” N Engl J Med. 2001 Dec 27; 345(26):1877-82.

3.Chen C., Lin X., Pan J., Fei Z., Chen L., Bai P.. “Is it necessary to repeat CT imaging and replanning during the course of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma?” Jpn J Radiol. 2013 Sep; 31(9):593-9.

4.Duma M.N., Kampfer S., Schuster T., Winkler C., Geinitz H.. “Adaptive radiotherapy for soft tissue changes during helical tomotherapy for head and neck cancer.” Strahlenther Onkol. 2012 Mar; 188(3):243-7.

5.De Kerf G., Van Gestel D., Mommaerts L., Van den Weyngaert D., Verellen D., et al.“Evaluation of the optimal combinations of modulation factor and pitch for Helical TomoTherapy plans made withTomoEdge using Pareto optimal fronts.”Radiat Oncol. 2015 Sep 17; 10:191.

6.Esposito M., Maggi G., Marino C., Bottalico L., Cagni E., Carbonini C., Casale M., Clemente S., D'Alesio V., Fedele D., Giglioli F.R., Landoni V.,Martinotti A., Nigro R., Strigari L., Villaggi E., Mancosu P.. “Multicentre treatment planning inter-comparison in a national context: The liver stereotactic ablative radiotherapy case.” Phys Med. 2016 Jan; 32(1):277-83.

7.Fiorino C., Dell′Oca I., Pierelli A., Broggi S., De Martin E., Di Muzio N., et al. “Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy. ” Radiother Oncol 2006; 78:276-82.

8.Friborg J., Wohlfahrt J., Melbye M.. “Familial risk and clustering of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Guangdong, China.” Cancer. 2005 Jan 1; 103(1).

9.Friborg J.T., Yuan J.M., Wang R., Koh W.P., Lee H.P., Yu M.C..“A prospective study of tobacco and alcohol use as risk factors for pharyngeal carcinomas in Singapore Chinese.” Cancer. 2007 Mar 15; 109(6).


10.Henle G., Henle W.. “Epstein-Barr virus-specific IgA serum antibodies as an outstanding feature of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.” Int J Cancer. 1976 Jan 15; 17(1):1-7.

11.Hansen E.K., Bucci M.K., Quivey J.M., Weinberg V., Xia P.. “Repeat CT imaging and replanning during the course of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer.” Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Feb 1; 64(2):355-62.

12.Jia W.H., Feng B.J., Xu Z.L., Zhang X.S., Huang P., Huang L.X., Yu X.J., Feng Q.S.,Yao M.H., Yao Y. , Zeng Y.X.. “Familial risk and clustering of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Guangdong, China” Cancer,101(2),363-369.

13.Kinhikar R.A., Murthy V., Goel V., Tambe CM., Dhote D.S., Deshpande D.D.. “Skin dose measurements using MOSFET and TLD for head and neck patients treated with tomotherapy. ” Appl Radiat Isot 2009; 67:1683-5.

14.Kim J.H., Stein A., Tsai N., Schultheiss T.E., Palmer J., Liu A., Rosenthal J., Forman S.J., Wong J.Y.. “Extramedullary relapse following total marrow and lymphoid irradiation in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.” Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 May 1; 89(1):75-81.

15.Lu S.H., Cheng J.C., Kuo S.H., Lee J.J., Chen L.H., Wu J.K., Chen Y.H., Chen W.Y., Wen S.Y., Chong F.C., Wu C.J., Wang C.W.. “Volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison with TomoTherapy and step-and-shoot IMRT.” Radiother Oncol. 2012 Sep;104(3):324-30.

16.Lee N., Xia P., Quivey J.M., Sultanem K., Poon I., Akazawa C., Akazawa P., Weinberg V., Fu K.K.. “Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in he treatment of
nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the UCSF experience.” Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 May 1; 53(1):12-22.

17.Mackie T.R., Balog J., Ruchala K., Shepard D., Aldridge S., Fitchard E., Reckwerdt P., Olivera G., McNutt T., Mehta M.. “Tomotherapy.” Semin Radiat Oncol. 1999 Jan;9(1):108-17.

18.Moldovan M., Fontenot J.D., Gibbons J.P., Lee T.K., Rosen I.I., Fields R.S., et al. “Investigation of pitch and jaw width to decrease delivery time of helical tomotherapy treatments for head and neck cancer. ” Med Dosim 2011; 36:397-403.

19.Old L.J., Boyse E.A., Oettgen H.F., Harven E.D., Geering G., Williamson B.,
Clifford P.. “Precipitating Antibody in Human Serum to an Antigen Present in Cultured Burkitt's Lymphoma Cells.” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Dec;56(6):1699-704.

20.Pow E.H, Kwong D.L., McMillan A.S., Wong M.C., Sham J.S., Leung L.H., Leung W.K.. “Xerostomia and quality of life after intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional radiotherapy for early-stagenasopharyngealcarcinoma: initial report on a randomized controlled clinical trial.” Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Nov 15; 66(4):981-91.

21.Rao M., Yang W., Chen F., Sheng K., Ye J., Mehta V., Shepard D., Cao D.. “Comparison of Elekta VMAT with helical tomotherapy and fixed field IMRT: plan quality, delivery efficiency and accuracy. ” Med Phys 2010; 37:1350–9.

22.Ryczkowski A., Piotrowski T. “Influence of the modulation factor on the treatment plan quality and execution time in Tomotherapy in head andneck cancer: In-phantom study.” J Cancer Res Ther. 2013 Oct-Dec; 9(4):618-23.

23.Stasi M., Bresciani S., Miranti A., Maggio A., Sapino V., Gabriele P.. “Pretreatment patient-specific IMRT quality assurance: a correlation study between gamma index and patientclinical dose volume histogram. ” Med Phys. 2012 Dec; 39(12):7626-34.

24.Salz H., Bohrisch B., Howitz S., Banz N., Weibert K., Wiezorek T., Wendt T.G.. “Intensity-modulated Total Body Irradiation (TBI) with TomoDirect™.” Radiat Oncol. 2015 Mar 6; 10:58.

25.Takahashi Y., Vagge S., Agostinelli S., Han E., Matulewicz L., Schubert K., Chityala R., Ratanatharathorn V., Tournel K., Penagaricano J.A., Florian S.,Mahe M.A., Verneris M.R., Weisdorf D.J., Corvo R., Dusenbery K.E., Storme G., Hui S.K.. “Multi-institutional feasibility study of a fast patient localization method in total marrow irradiation with helicaltomotherapy: a global health initiative by the international consortium of total marrow irradiation.” Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jan 1; 91(1):30-8.

26.Yang H., Hu W., Ding W., Shan G., Wang W., Yu C., Wang B., Shao M., Wang J.,
Yang W..“Changes of the transverse diameter and volume and dosimetry before the 25th fraction during the course ofintensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.”Med Dosim. 2012 Summer; 37(2):225-9.

27.Yoon M., Shin D.H., Kim J., Kim J.W., Kim D.W., Park S.Y., Lee S.B., Kim J.Y., Park H.J., Park B.K., Shin S.H.. “Craniospinal irradiation techniques: a dosimetric comparison of proton beams with standard and advancedphoton radiotherapy.”Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 1; 81(3):637-46.

28.Yu M.C., Ho J.H., Lai S.H., Henderson B.E.. “Cantonese-style salted fish as a cause of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: report of a case-control study in Hong Kong.” Cancer Res. 1986 Feb; 46(2):956-61.

29.Wu R.H., Yeh T.C., Wen C.C., Wang P.I., Hsiao C.Y, Hsu C..“The Influence of Field Width and Pitch in Tomotherapy Plan: Phantom study.”Therapeut Radiol Oncol 2014; 21(2): 131-140.

30.Ward M.H., Pan W.H., Cheng Y.J., Li F.H., Brinton L.A., Chen C.J., Hsu M.M., Chen I.H., Levine P.H., Yang C.S., Hildesheim A.. “Dietary exposure to nitrite and nitrosamines and risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan. ” Int J Cancer. 2000 Jun 1; 86(5):603-9.


二、中文部分
1.行政院衛生福利部國民健康署網站http://www.hpa.gov.tw (103年2月查詢)
2.國家衛生研究院鼻咽癌臨床診療指引(2011年版)

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top