跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.137) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/06/14 10:03
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:吳思宜
論文名稱:家庭暴力罪的拘捕與起訴—從保護被害人的角度出發
指導教授:謝如媛謝如媛引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:法律學研究所
學門:法律學門
學類:一般法律學類
論文種類:學術論文
畢業學年度:103
語文別:中文
論文頁數:245
中文關鍵詞:家庭暴力被害人父權告訴乃論起訴禁止撤回強制逮捕修復式司法拘捕
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:518
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:4
台灣在 1998 年以美國為主要參考國而制定出堪稱亞洲第一部的家庭暴力防 治法,宣告法入家門的時代來臨。美國對家暴案件的拘捕與起訴制度是採用與一 般犯罪不同的強制逮捕與禁止撤回制度,而台灣即參考美國強制逮捕制度,形成 現今家暴防治法所規定的家暴拘捕制度,惟在起訴制度上則是回歸一般犯罪處理, 進而當案件屬於告訴乃論罪時,現行家暴拘捕制度所搭配的起訴制度即為一般犯 罪告訴乃論起訴制度。
本論文從保護家暴被害人權益的角度出發,觀察台灣現行家暴拘捕與告訴乃 論起訴制度是否真能保護家暴被害人,還是會造成被害人二次傷害。筆者首先探 討法律制定當時,家庭暴力以及家暴被害人是如何被描繪與看待,進而發現台灣 的家暴拘捕與告訴乃論起訴制度是不相一致,而在這樣的不一致之下,造成實務 上難以落實家暴拘捕的目的,為被害人帶來不利後果。另外,我們所預設的家暴 與被害人形象,是具有侷限性,忽略了家暴問題所涉及的許多結構性壓迫,以及 被害人的多元面貌。則,若欲解決現行不一致的家暴拘捕與告訴乃論起訴制度所 產生的問題,進而完整參考美國,除了採行強制逮捕外,尚將告訴乃論起訴制度 改為美國禁止撤回,這樣較一般犯罪更為強制與壓縮被害人聲音的家暴處理作法, 至多也只能處理與保護立法形象內的家暴問題與被害人,而不僅無法徹底處理所 有家暴問題,還反而可能對被害人造成二次傷害。
基於上述這樣的發現,筆者最後主張,台灣不應貿然完整納入美國禁止撤回 制度,而仍應維持現行的家暴拘捕制度與告訴乃論起訴制度,並促使警察應以保 護被害人安全為是否執行拘捕的主要考量因素,接著在逮捕之後,採行修復式司 法,讓多元複雜的家暴問題與被害人能夠擁有不同選擇,而更可能獲得處理與保 護。
第一章、緒論 4
第一節、論述背景與問題意識 4
第二節、研究方法與研究範圍 7
第三節、論文架構 9
第二章、台灣與美國家庭暴力拘捕與起訴制度 12
第一節、 規範家庭暴力的法律 12
第二節、家庭暴力拘捕與起訴制度制定歷史 14
第一項、 傳統警察與檢察官對家庭暴力案件的刑事處理 15
第一款、美國傳統檢警對家暴案件的刑事處理 15
第二款、台灣家庭暴力防治法制定前檢警對家暴案件的處理 19
第二項、兩國的家庭暴力拘捕與起訴政策制定歷史 20
第一款、美國 20
第二款、台灣 30
第三款、小結 35
第三節、家庭暴力拘捕與起訴法制的現況 36
第一項、強制拘捕政策 36
第一款、美國的無令狀逮捕 36
第二款、台灣的應逮捕與得逕行拘提 40
第二項、 起訴制度 41
第一款、美國的禁止撤回制度 42
第二款、台灣的告訴乃論罪與非告訴乃論罪 45
第三項、小結 46
第四節、台灣近年來的家暴拘捕與起訴實況 48
第一項、近年來的家暴概況 48
第二項、近年來家暴的拘捕與起訴統計 50
第一款、警察 50
第二款、檢察官 53
第三項、小結 54
第三章、立法基礎不一致的家暴拘捕與告訴乃論起訴制度 56
第一節、 家暴與家暴被害人形象 56
第一項、 家庭暴力是父權性別壓迫問題 56
第一款、家庭暴力是由性別壓迫家長父權制所產生 56
第二款、父權結構漠視與增長家暴行為 60
第三款、台灣也描繪出是父權社會結構產生家暴問題 61
第二項、父權家暴底下的被害人是非理性弱者 67
第一款、家暴被害人被動順從,無法積極做出正常決定 67
第二款、被害人因為無助與創傷而選擇不離開 72
第三款、 台灣也描繪家暴被害人為不理性無助者 75
第三項、小結 80
第二節、家暴拘捕與告訴乃論起訴制度所呈現的家暴被害人形象 80
第一項、家暴與被害人形象展現到強制逮捕與禁止撤回制度 80
第二項、立法形象展現到台灣的家暴拘捕制度上 85
第一款、一般犯罪與家暴犯罪的逮捕與逕行拘提 86
第二款、一般犯罪與家暴犯罪拘捕的被害人意願 87
第三款、小結—家暴與家暴被害人形象展現到拘捕制度 90
第三項、立法形象未呈現到告訴乃論起訴制度上 91
第一款、立法者對於家暴案件告訴乃論起訴制度的討論 91
第二款、當家暴案件屬於告訴乃論罪時 93
第三款、與拘捕制度呈現的家暴被害人形象不相一致 96
第四款、小結—被害人形象未呈現到告訴乃論起訴制度上 97
第四項、小結—呈現不一致被害人形象的拘捕與告訴乃論起訴 98
第四章、家暴拘捕與告訴乃論起訴制度的矛盾問題與其侷限 100
第一節、不一致的拘捕與告訴乃論起訴所生的矛盾與問題 100
第一項、制度呈現的被害人形象彼此不一致 100
第二項、國家某程度的推卸責任 101
第三項、家暴拘捕目的不易實現 105
第一款、拘捕與否以被害人告訴與否為前提因素105
第二款、被害人告訴與否為拘捕與否的前提因素是否恰當 107
第三款、家暴案件以被害人告訴與否決定拘捕與否的問題 110
第二節、強制逮捕與禁止撤回制度的侷限 119
第一項、父權以外的結構性壓迫 119
第一款、多元化的家暴類型 120
第二款、只關注性別壓迫會產生的問題 124
第三款、承認性別以外的其它壓迫 128
第四款、多元化家暴類型性別以外的其他壓迫 135
第五款、小結—家庭暴力
一、日文部分
01. 青柳文雄《日本刑事訴訟法論》,立花書房,1975年7月30日,5版
02. 川出敏裕、金光旭,《刑事政策》,成文堂,2012年5月1日
03. 伊藤栄樹、亀山継夫、小林充、香城敏麿、佐々木史朗、増井清彥,《注釈 刑事訴訟法(第六卷)》,立花書房,1996 年 7 月 1 日
二、英文部分 (一)專書
01. Bartollas, Clemens, Katherine Stuart Van Wormer, Women and the criminal justice system , Boston Mass. : Pearson Allyn and Bacon, 2nd edit (2007).
02. Buzawa, Carl G., Eva Schlesinger Buzawa, Domestic VIolence The Criminal Justice Response, Sage Publication, (2003).
03. BUZAWA, CARL G., EVA SCHLESINGER BUZAWA, Domestic VIolence The Criminal Justice Response, Sage Publication, 3rd edit (2003).
04. Daly, Kathleen, Seeking justice in the 21st century : the contested politics of race and gender, Griffith University, (2005).
05. Gelles, Richard J., Murray A. Straus, Intimate Violence: The Causes and Consequences of Abuse in the American Family, Touchstone Books, (1989). 06. Gondolf, Edward W, Ellen R Fisher, Battered women as survivors: An alternative to treating learned helplessness, Lexington, Mass. : Lexington Books,(1988).
07. National Prosecution Standards, National District Attorneys Association, 3rd edit (2009).
08. Pratt, Christina, Natalie J. Sokoloff, Domestic Violence at the Margins:
Readings on Race, Class, Gender, and Culture, Rutgers University Press, (2005).
09. ABA Standards for Criminal Justice, Prosecution Function and Defense Function, 3rd edit (1993).
(二)文獻
01. Abel, Eileen Mazur, Comparing the Social Service Utilization, Exposure to Violence, and Trauma Symptomology of Domestic Violence Female“Victims”
and Female “Batterers”, 16 Journal of Family Violence 401(2001).
02. Adelman, Madelaine, Carol Gregory, Edna Erez, Intersections of Immigration and Domestic Violence: Voices of Battered Immigrant Women, 4 Feminist Criminology 32(2009).
03. Aguilar225, Rudy J., Narina Nunez Nightingale, The Impact of Specific Battering Experiences on the Self-Esteem of Abused Women, 9 Journal of Family Violence 35(1994).
04. Anderson, Kristin L., Gender, Status, and Domestic Violence: An Integration of Feminist and Family Violence Approaches, 59 Journal of Marriage and Family 655(1997).
05. Anthias, Floya, The Intersections of Class, Gender, Sexuality and ‘Race’: The Political Economy of Gendered Violence, International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society (2013).
06. Beck, Amy, Domestic Violence: The Use of Pro-Arrest Policies and Mandatory Prosecutions ,5 (2011) Liberty University).
07. Bell, Margret E., Deborah Epstein, Lisa A. Goodman, Transforming Aggressive Prosecution Policies: Prioritizing Victims' Long-Term Safety in the Prosecution of Domestic Violence Cases, 11 Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law 465(2003).
08. BENSON225, SARA R., Failure to Arrest: A Pilot Study of Police Response toDomestic Violence in Rural Illinois, 17 American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law 685(2009).
09. Binell, Margaret, Brian Cheers, Heather Coleman, Ian Gentle, Grace Miller, Judy Taylor, Colin Weetra, Family violence An Australian Indigenous community tells its story, 49 International Social Work 51(2006).
10. Bograd, Michele, Strengthening domestic violence theories: intersections of race, class, sexual orientation, and gender, 25 Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 275(1999).
11. Bohmer, Carol, Jennifer Brandt, Denise Bronson, Helen Hartnett, Domestic Violence Law Reforms: Reactions from the Trenches, 29 Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare 71(2002).
12. Brownridge, Douglas A., Understanding the Elevated Risk of Partner Violence Against Aboriginal Women: A Comparison of Two Nationally Representative Surveys of Canada, 23 Journal of Family Violence 353(2008).
13. Brown, Geneva, Ain't I a Victim? The Intersectionality of Race, Class, and Gender in Domestic Violence and the Courtroom, 19 Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender 147(2012).
14. Butler, Lola, African American Lesbian Women Experiencing Partner Abuse, in McClennen, Joan C., John Joseph Gunther(eds.), A professional's guide to understanding gay and lesbian domestic violence, E. Mellen ,(1999).
15. Burgess-Proctor, Amanda, Intersections of Race, Class, Gender, and Crime: Future Directions for Feminist Criminology, 1 Feminist Criminology 27(2006).
16. Carney, Michelle Mohr, John R. Barner, Interventions for Intimate Partner Violence: A Historical Review, 26 Journal of Family Violence 235(2011).
17. Cascardi226, Michele, K. Daniel O'Leary, Depressive Symptomatology, Self-Esteem, and Self-Blame in Battered Women, 7 Journal of Family Violence 249(1992).
18. Çelik, Ahmet, An analysis of mandatory arrest policy on domestic violence, 10 International Journal of Human Sciences 1503(2013).
19. Coker, Donna, Crime Control and Feminist Law Reform in Domestic Violence Law:A Critical Review, 4 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 801(2001).
20. Coker, Donna, Race, Poverty, and the Crime-Centered Response to Domestic Violence: A Comment on Linda Mills's Insult to Injury: Rethinking Our Responses to Intimate Abuse, 10 Violence Against Women 1331(2004).
21. Collins, Patricia Hill, The tie that binds: race, gender and US violence, 21 Ethnic and Racial Studies 917(1998).
22. Crenshaw, Kimberle, Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics, 140 The University of Chicago Legal Forum 139(1989).
23. Crenshaw, Kimberle, Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color, 43 Stanford Law Review 1241(1991).
24. Cripps, Kyllie, Indigenous Family Violence: Pathways Forward, in Purdie, Nola, Pat Dudgeon, Roz Walker(eds.), Working Together:Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice, Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, (2010)
25. DALY, KATHLEEN, Class-Race-Gender: Sloganeering in Search of Meaning, 20 Social Justice 56(1993).
26. Daly, Kathleen, Different ways of conceptualizing sex/gender in feminist theory and their implications for criminology, 1 Theoretical Criminology 25(1997).
27. Daly, Kathleen, Black women, white justice, in Sarat, Austin, Marianne Constable (eds.), Crossing Boundaries: Traditions and Transformations in Law and Society Research, Evanston: Northwestern University Press and American Bar Foundation, (1998).
28. Daly, Kathleen, Lisa Maher, Crossroads and Intersections: Building from feminist critique, in Kathleen Daly and Lisa Maher(eds.), Criminology at the Crossroads Feminist Readings in Crime and Justice, Oxford University Press, USA, (1998).
29. Dobash, Russell P., R. Emerson Dobash, Community Response to Violence against Wives: Charivari, Abstract Justice and Patriarch, 28 Social Problems 563(1981).
30. Douglas, Heather, The criminal law's response to domestic violence:what's going
on?, 30 Sydney Law Review 439(2008).
31. Eaton228, Mary, Abuse by Any Other Name: Feminism, Difference, and
Intralesbinan Violence, in Fineman, Martha Albertson, Roxanne Mykitiuk(eds.), The public nature of private violence : the discovery of domestic abuse, New York : Routledge, (1994).
32. Epstein, Deborah, Lisa A Goodman, Mary P Koss, Jacquelyn W White, Alan E Kazdin, The justice system response to domestic violence, 2 Violence against women and Children 215(2011).
33. Epstein, Deborah, Effective Intervention in Domestic Violence Cases: Rethinking the Roles of Prosecutors, Judges, and the Court System, 11 Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 3(1999).
34. Fedders, Barbara, Lobbying for Mandatory-Arrest Policies: Race, Class, and the Politics of the Battered Women’s Movement, Review of law and social change 281(1997).
35. Ford, David A., Coercing Victim Participation in Domestic Violence Prosecutions, 18 Journal of Interpersonal Violence 669(2003).
36. Gelles, Richard J., Through a Sociological Lens Social Structure and Family Violence, in Gelles, Richard J., Donileen R. Loseke, Mary M. Cavanaugh, Current Controversies on Family Violence, SAGE, (1993).
37. Goldfarb, Sally F., A clash of culture: Women, Domestic Violence, and Law in the United States, in Gender and culture at the limit of rights, University of Pennsylvania Press, 58(2011).
38. Goodmark, Leigh, When Is a Battered Woman Not a Battered Woman? When She Fights Back, 20 Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 75(2008).
39. Goodmark, Leigh, Autonomy Feminism: An Anti-Essentialist Critique of Mandatory Interventions in Domestic Violence Cases, 37 Florida State University Law Review 1(2009).
40. Goodmark, Leigh, Reframing Domestic Violence Law and Policy: An Anti-Essentialist Proposal, 31 Journal of Law & Policy 39(2009).
41. Gruber, Aya, Domestic Violence Law and Feminism’s Identity Crisis: Toward a “Neo-feminist” Legal Theory, ExpressO (2012). Available at: http://works.bepress.com/aya_gruber/7
42. Hampton229, Robert L., Ricardo Carrillo, Joan Kim, Domestic Violence in African American Communities, in Pratt, Christina, Natalie J. Sokoloff, Domestic Violence at the Margins: Readings on Race, Class, Gender, and Culture, Rutgers University Press, (2005).
43. Han, Erin L., Mandatory Arrest and No-Drop Policies: Victim Empowerment in Domestic Violence Cases, 23 Boston College Third World Law Journal 159(2003). 44. Harrisona,229 Lisa A., Cynthia Willis Esquedaa, Myths and stereotypes of actors involved in domestic violence: Implications for domestic violence culpability attributions, 4 Aggression and Violent Behavior 129(1999).
45. Humphreys, Cathy, Jennifer Nixon, Marshalling the Evidence: Using Intersectionality in the Domestic Violence Frame, 17 Social Politics 137(2010).
14. Cheryl Hanna, No Right to Choose: Mandated Participation in Domestic Violence Prosecutions, 109 Harvard Law Review 1849(1996).
46. Humphries, Drew, No Easy Answers: Public Policy, Criminal Justice, And Domesti Violecne, 2 Criminology & Public Policy 91(2002).
47. Hunnicutt, Gwen, Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: resurrecting "patriarchy" as a theoretical tool, 15 Violence Against Women 553(2009).
48. JOHNSON, MICHAEL P., Patriarchal Terrorism and Common Couple Violence: Two Forms of Violence against Women, 57 Journal of Marriage and the Family 283(1995).
49. Josephson, Jyl, The Intersectionality of Domestic Violence and Welfare in the Lives of Poor Women, 6 Journal of Poverty 1(2002).
50. Kanuha, Valli, Domestic violence, racism, and the battered women's movement in the United States, in Edleson , Jeffrey L. , Zvi C. Eisikovits (eds), Future interventions with battered women and their families, SAGE Publications, (1995). 51. Kanuha, Valli Kalei, Compounding the Triple Jeopardy Battering in Lesbian of Color Relationships, in Pratt, Christina, Natalie J. Sokoloff(eds.), Domestic
Violence at the Margins: Readings on Race, Class, Gender, and Culture, Rutgers University Press, (2005).
52. Launius, Margaret H., Carol Ummel Lindquist, Learned Helplessness, External Locus of Control, and Passivity in Battered Women, 3 Journal of Interpersonal Violence 307(1988).
53. Lippman, Jonathan, Ensuring victim safety and abuser accountability: reforms and revisions in New York courts' response to domestic violence, 76 Albany Law Review 1417(2013).
54. Lundberg-Love, Paula K., D. Karen Wilkerson, Battered Women, in Lundberg-Love., Paula K. , Shelly Marmion(eds.), Intimate Violence Against Women: When Spouses, Partners, or Lovers Attack, Praeger, (2006).
55. Mahoney, Martha R., Victimization or Oppression? Women’s Lives, Violence, and Agency, in Fineman, Martha Albertson, Roxanne Mykitiuk(eds.), The public nature of private violence : the discovery of domestic abuse , New York : Routledge, (1994). 56. Marmion, Shelly L., Donna Lee Faulkner, Effects of Class and Culture on Intimate Partner Violence, in Lundberg-Love., Paula K. , Shelly Marmion(eds.), Intimate Violence Against Women: When Spouses, Partners, or Lovers Attack, Praeger, (2006).
57. McDermott, M. Joan, James Garofalo, When Advocacy for Domestic Violence Victims Backfires: Types and Sources of Victim Disempowerment, 10 Violence Against Women 1245(2004 ).
58. Mills, Linda G., Killing Her Softly: Intimate Abuse and the Violence of State Intervention, 113 Harvard Law Review 550(1999).
59. MSW, Rosemary Woods, Rhea V Almeida ACSW, Theresa Messineo MSW, Roberto J. Font MSW, Chris Heer MSW, Violence in the Lives of the Racially and Sexually Different, 5 Journal of Feminist Family Therapy 99(1994).
60. Murray, Suellen, Anastasia Powell, ''What's the Problem?'': Australian Public Policy Constructions of Domestic and Family Violence, 15 Violence Against Women 532(2009).
61. Norris, Alexis, April M. Zeoli, Hannah Brenner, Mandatory Preferred, or
Discretionary: How the Classification of Domestic Violence Warrentless Arrest Laws
Impacts their Estimated Effects on Intimate Partner Homicide, Evaluation
Review 1(2011).
62. Norris, Alexis, April M. Zeoli, Hannah Brenner, A Summary and Analysis of
Warrantless Arrest Statutes for Domestic Violence in the United States, 26 Journal of
Interpersonal Violence 2811(2011).
63. Perilla, Julia L., Domestic Violence as a Human Rights Issue: The Case of
Immigrant Latinos, 21 Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 107(1999).
64. Platt, Alyssa C., Frank A. Sloan, Lindsey M. Chepke, Claire E. Blevins,
Deterring domestic violence: Do criminal sanctions reduce repeat offenses?, 46 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 51(2013).
65. Pranis, Kay, Restorative values and confronting family violence, in Strang, Heather, John Braithwaite(eds.), Restorative justice and family violence, Cambridge University Press, (2002)
66. Rennison, Callie, Mike Planty, Nonlethal intimate partner violence: examining race, gender, and income patterns, 18 Violence and Victims 433(2003).
67. Renzetti, Claire M., Violence and Abuse among Same-Sex Couples, in Albert P. Cardarelli(eds.), Violence Between Intimate Partners : Patterns, Causes, and Effects, Prentice Hall, (1996).
68. Ristock, Janice, Understanding Violence in Lesbian Relationships,in Stark, Evan, Eva Schlesinger Buzawa(eds.), Violence against Women in Families and Relationships, Praeger, (2009).
69. ROBBINS, KALYANI, No-Drop Prosecution of Domestic Violence: Just Good Policy, or Equal Protection Mandate?, 52 Stanford Law Review 205(1999).
70. Ruttenberg, Miriam H., A Feminist Critique of Mandatory Arrest: An Analysis of Race and Gender in Domestic Violence Policy, 2 The American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law 171(1994).
71. Sack, Emily J., Battered Women and the State: The Struggle for the Future of Domestic Violence Policy, 1657 Wisconsin Law Review 1658(2004).
72. Sato, Robin A., Elaine M. Heiby, Correlates of Depressive Symptoms Among Battered Women, 7 Journal of Family Violence 229(1992).
73. Simon, Leonore M. J., A therapeutic jurisprudence approach to the legal processing of domestic violence cases, 1 Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 43(1995).
74. Sokoloff , Natalie J., Ida Dupont, Domestic Violence Examing the
Intersections of Race, Class, and Gender---An Introduction,in Pratt, Christina, Natalie J. Sokoloff(eds.), Domestic Violence at the Margins: Readings on Race, Class, Gender, and Culture, Rutgers University Press, (2005).
75. Sokoloff, Natalie J., Domestic Violence at the Intersections of Race, Class, and Gender: Challenges and Contributions to Understanding Violence Against Marginalized Women in Diverse Communities, 11 Violence Against Women January 38(2005).
76. Vilhauer, Jennice, Understanding The Victim: A Guide To Aid In The Prosecution Of Domestic Violence, 27 Fordham Urban Law Journal 953(2000).
77. Wells, William, William DeLeon-Granados, Jennie Long, Beyond Minneapolis: A Preliminary Theoretical Model for Alleviating Conceptual Ruts in Domestic Violence Intervention Research, 6 Western Criminology Review 43(2005).
78. West, Carolyn M., Domestic Violence in Ethnically and Racially Diverse Families--The “Political Gag Order” Has Been Lifted, in Christina Pratt and Natalie J. Sokoloff, Domestic Violence at the Margins: Readings on Race, Class, Gender, and Culture, Rutgers University Press, (2005).
79. Yllo, Kersti A., Through Feminist Lens Gender, Diversity, and violence: Extending the Feminist Framework, in Gelles, Richard J., Donileen R. Loseke, Mary M. Cavanaugh, Current Controversies on Family Violence , SAGE , 2nd edit(2005).
80. Putting the picture together: inquiry into response by government agencies to complaints of family violence and child abuse in Aboriginal communities(2002).
81. The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment. pt. 1-13 (1984).
82. Arrest Policies for Domestic Violence. pt. 1-16 (2010).
83. Violence Against Women: Synthesis of Research for Prosecutors. pt. 1-31 (2003).
84. Evaluation of Efforts to Implement No-Drop Policies: Two Central Values in Conflict, Final Report. pt. 1-81 (2001).
85. Nancarrow, Heather, In Search of Justice in Domestic and Family Violence (2003) Griffith University).
86. DEMPSEY, TIFFANY, Mandatory Arrest Laws: A Harmful Solution to Domestic Violence(2012),資料來源: http://tiffdemps.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/mandatory-arrest-revise_pdf2.pdf,查訪 日期:2013年11月14日
三、中文部分 (一)專書
01. 林俊益,《刑事訴訟法概論(下)》,新學林,2014年2月,11版1刷
02. 林鈺雄,《刑事訴訟法(上)》,自版,2013年9月,7版1刷
03. 林鈺雄,《刑事訴訟法(下)》,自版,2013年9月,7版1刷
04. 柯麗評、王珮玲、張錦麗,《家庭暴力理論政策與實務》,巨流,2005年
05. 高鳳仙,《家庭暴力防治法規專論》,五
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top