臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究利用企業轉型和企業成長方面文獻，提出企業成長三個範疇和企業轉型策略，企業成長方面分別利用成長方向、成長模式和多角化類型形成成長架構；企業轉型策略則歸納出產品轉型策略、市場轉型策略、垂直/水平整合策略和多角化轉型策略四種。首先確認企業不同成長階段當中的各種成長方式，以及各採用何種成長策略。確認成長策略之後，再探討此種成長方式的轉型策略為何。因此可以看出在不同成長階段之下，企業的成長和轉型策略變化軌跡。

本研究採用個案研究法，探討個案公司亞力山卓在各個成長階段之下，如何採取策略來達到轉型和成長。首先，經由文獻的探討了解到企業可以利用何種轉型方法來達到轉型的目的，以及追求成長的策略方向。再藉由初級和次級資料整理亞力山卓的企業資源和策略方向，並且依照設計的訪談問題進行訪問，最後再將訪談的資料與相關理論進行分析並探討轉型類型和成長方向。本研究的主要發現為:

1. 在創業期，亞力山卓採行的策略是產品轉型策略。成長方向是利用技術升級；成長模式為內部發展；多角化類型是單一產品階段。
2. 在成長階段，亞力山卓利用市場轉型策略和多角化轉型策略。雖然在此階段採取兩種不同的轉型策略同時並行，但是主要策略是放在市場轉型策略面上。成長方向則是利用改變地理區域市場和顧客群；成長模式為內部發展；多角化類型是單一產品線階段。
3. 在成熟期，亞力山卓採取垂直整合策略。成長方向為通路和服務；成長模式採用策略聯盟；多角化類型是單一產品線階段。

最後提出研究結論與建議作為個案公司亞力山卓參考，由於中國大陸的成本優勢已經不若以往，所以現階段可以考慮擴大垂直/整合策略以及因地制宜的專業分工，以降低製造成本；另外，在多角化方面，可以嘗試進入更多相關市場。在成長的方向上，成長類型可以朝多重產品線邁進，以調整多角化後產生的需求。

This case study is adopted the literature of business transformation and business growth. The study contains two dimension, one is the three categories of business growth, and the other is business transformation strategy. Business growth contains direction, mode of accomplish, and type. Business transformation strategy contains product transformation, market transformation, vertical/horizontal integration, and diversification. After enterprise confirming what growing stage they are, and choosing what growth strategy they adopt, we can discuss what transformation strategy it is.
This study is adopted the method of case study to discuss how Alexandre pursuit their success by adopt appropriate transformation strategy in each growing stage. At the beginning, we can analysis how enterprise achieve their success by reviewing not only the theoretical literature but primary and secondary data. Then, the outcomes of interviews based on the process of questionnaires which are designed to analyze the both the type of transformation and the direction of growth. It is found in this study,

1. During entrepreneurial phase, Alexandre mainly adopts product transformation strategy . In the section of direction, technology is adopted; In the section of mode of accomplish, internal development is adopted; In the section of type, single line is adopted.
2. During growth phase, Alexandre adopts market transformation strategy and diversification. Nevertheless, they mainly adopts market transformation strategy in this phase. In the section of direction, changing region and customer strategy is adopted; In the section of mode of accomplish, internal development is adopted; In the section of type, single product line is adopted.
3. During maturity phase, Alexandre mainly adopts vertical integration strategy . In the section of direction, channels and service is adopted; In the section of mode of accomplish, strategy alliance is adopted; In the section of type, single product line is adopted.

Eventually, the conclusion and suggestions will be provided in this study for the usage of future reference. As a result of the product cost is more expensive than it used to be, they can adopt a contingent strategy to reduce the production cost. Moreover, they can try to entry more related diversification market. In the growth direction, they may make their way forward the multiple product line, for the sake of demand which they need after diversifying.

頁數
目　錄....................................V
圖　次....................................VI
表　次....................................VII
第一章 緒論................................1
第一節 研究動機............................1
第二節 研究問題............................3
第三節 研究目的............................3
第四節 文章架構............................4
第二章 文獻探討............................5
第一節 企業轉型............................5
第二節 企業成長策略........................11
第三節 大陸地區家具業簡介...................25
第三章 研究方法............................27
第一節 觀念性研究架構.......................28
第二節 研究設計............................32
第三節 個案研究流程.........................39
第四章 研究發現.............................42
第一節 個案公司簡介.........................42
第二節 創業團隊簡介.........................50
第三節 個案公司企業成長階段及成長轉型策略軌跡...51
第五章 結論與建議...........................60
第一節 結論................................60
第二節 實務建議.............................64
第三節 研究限制.............................65
參考文獻...................................65
附錄一 亞力山卓訪談問題......................1
附錄二 亞力山卓訪談問題......................4
附錄三 亞力山卓訪談問題......................6

一、中文部份
1.方至民(2000)，企業競爭優勢，台北: 前程企管公司。
2.方至民，鍾憲瑞(2006)，策略管理，台北:前程企管公司。
3.黃亦筠(2008)，「兩手策略，圓了品牌夢」，天下雜誌，第391期，頁124-125。
4.伍忠賢(2002)，「企業轉型的策略方案抉擇」，管理雜誌，第314期，頁106-110 。
5.江金龍譯，龍澤正雄、筒井信行著（1988），企業轉型-中小企業如何脫胎換骨，台北:尖端出版社。
6.竹本次郎(1989)，從勞動密集到技術密集的轉型，日本文摘雜誌社。
7.何雍慶(1983)，現代管理制度與企業成長階段之文獻探討，中國經濟企業研究所，台北:華泰書局。
8.李吉仁，陳振祥(2005)，企業概論，台北: 華泰書局。
9.周佳欣(1997)，台灣中小企業策略性轉型之研究，東吳大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
10.周佩萱(1993)，「試析我國中小企業轉型困境」，台灣經濟研究月刊，第十六卷，第八期，頁41-47 。
11.林寄雯譯，日本中小企業事業團編譯(1992)，中小企業轉型策略，經濟部國貿局。
12.林建煌編譯，Stephen P. Robbins & David A. DeCenzo 著(2002)，現代管理學，台北:華泰書局。
13.洪世章(2007)，「企業成長、策略選擇與策略改變」，中山管理評論，第十五卷，第一期，頁11-35。
14.陳明璋（1990），企業贏的策略：掌握成功的四項關鍵：經理人、接棒、轉型、創新，台北: 遠流出版。
15.陳明璋（1996），「企業轉型的策略與成功關鍵」，貿易週刊，第1690期，頁18-21。
16.許壽峰(1989)，「小巨人耀昇的時代」，戰略生產力雜誌，第397期，頁16-37。
17.湯明哲(2007)，「定位與核心能力並不衝突」，哈佛商業評論中文版，第7期，頁42-43。
18.詹前學(2000)，「企業轉型策略探討」，台肥月刊，第四十一卷，第六期，頁30-45 。
19.蕭瑞麟(2007)，不用數字的研究，台北: 培生集團。


二、英文部分
1.Adrian, J. S.(1996), Value Migration : How to Think Several Moves Ahead of The Competition. Boston: The President and Fellows of Harvard College.
2.Ansoff, H. I.(1957), “Strategies for Diversification, ” Harvard Business Review, Vol.35, No.5, pp.113-124.
3.Adams, J. D.(1984), Transforming Work, Miles Review Press, Alexandria, VA.
4.Baghai, M., Coley, S. and White, D.(1999), The Alchemy of Growth-Kickstarting and Sustaining Growth in Your Company, The Free Press.
5.Bibeault, D.(1988), Corporate Turnaround, McGraw-Hill, New York.
6.Churchill, N. C. and Lewis, V. L.(1983), “ Growing Concern：The Five Stages of Small Business Growth,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.61, No.3, pp.30-48.
7.Chandler, A. D.(1962), Strategy and Structure, Mass: The M. I. T. Press.
8.Dale, E.(1967), Organization, N.Y.: American Management Association.
9.Daft, R. L.(2004), Organization Theory and Design, 8th ED., South-Western.
10.Devlin, G.(1991), “Diversification: A Redundant Strategic Option, ” European Management Journal, Vol.9, No.1, pp.76-81.
11.Eisenhardt, K. M.(1989), “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, Vol.14, No.4, pp.532-550
12.Greiner, L.(1972), “Evolution and Revolution as Organization Grow, ” Harvard Business Review, Vol.50, No.4, pp.37-46.
13.Hax, A. C. and Majluf, N. S.(1991), The Strategy Concept and Process: A Pragmatic Approach, Prentice Hall.
14.Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. K.(1989), “Strategic Intent,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.67, No.3, pp.63-78.
15.Kotter, J. P.(2007), “Leading Change, ” Harvard Business Review, Vol.85, No.1 , pp.96-103.
16.Katz, D. and Kahn, R. L. (1978), The social psychology of organizations, New York: John Wiley.
17.Kilmann, R. H. and Covin, T. I.(1988), Corporate Transformation: Revitalization Organization for Competitive World, Jessey-Bass Inc.
18.Kimberly, J. R. and Quinn, R. E.(1983), Managing Organizational Transition, Homewood, Illision: Jessry Base Inc.
19.Lavy, A. and Merry, U.(1988), Organizational Transformation : Revitalization Organization for Competitive World, New York: Praeger.
20.Lippitt, G. L. and Schmidt, W. H.(1967), “Crises in a Developing Organization”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.45, No.6, pp.102-112.
21.Langley, A.(1999), “Strategies for Theorizing From Process Data,” Academy of Management Review, Vol.24, No.4, pp.691-701.
22.Lyden, F. J.(1975), “Using Parson’s Functional Analysis in the Study of Public Organizations,” Administration Science Quarterly, Vol.20, No.1, pp.59-70.
23.Michael, E. P.(1996), “What Is Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.74, No.6, pp.61-78.
24.Michael, E. Porter(1985), Competitive advantage, New York : The Free Press.
25.Miller, D. and Friesen, P. H.(1984), “A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle,” Management Science, Vol.30, No.10, pp.1161-1183.
26.Pettigrew, A. M.(1997), “What Is Processual Analysis, ” The Scandinavian Journal of Management, Special Issue on Conducting Process Research, pp.337-348.
27.Penrose(1995), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford University Press, New York.
28.Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G.(1990), “The Core Competence of Corporation,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.68, No.3, pp.79-91.
29.Quinn, R. E. and Cameron, K.(1983), “Organizational Life Cycle and Shifting Criteria of effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence, ” Management Science, Vol.29,No.1, pp.33-51.
30.Scott, B. R.(1973), “ The Industrial State Old Myths& New Realities,” Harvard Business Review , Vol.51, No.2 pp.133-140.
31.Shaheen, G. T.(1994), Approach to Transformation, Chief Executive, pp.2-5.
32.Starbuck, W. H.(1965), “ Organizational Growth and Development, ” Handbook of Organizations, Chicago: Rand McNally, pp.451
33.Trewatha R. L. and Newport G. M.(1979), Management, Dallas, Texas: Business Publication, Inc.
34.Tosi, H. L. and Stephen, J.(1976), Carroll, Management: Contingencies, Structure, and Process, Chicago: St. Clair Press.
35.Yin, R. K.(2003), Case Study Research Design and Methods, Sege Publications, Lodon.