臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

大眾運輸導向式發展(Transit Oriented Development,TOD)，為因應自18世紀以來工業革命後，人口過度集中於城市，造成城市的環境汙染嚴重，且因人口暴漲，使的小汽車的擁有輛增加，造成環境進一步的汙染，為了解決該現象，美國首先提出以開發衛星城鎮，透過大眾運輸的串連，不但減少私人載具的使用量，且亦達到都市人口的削減。
台灣鐵路局自民國94年開始推動捷運化以來，在除了既有車站外，新增多處簡易型通勤車站，使站距縮小，並利用密集發車之營運模式，以增加旅次量，使的車站周邊地區土地開發得以成長；台中地區自民國105年鐵路高架化後，改變了整個城市的面貌，透過高架捷運化，使的車站數量從原本5處車站，新增至10處，未來周邊土地開發將會有相當的發展。
本研究透過蒐集並分析現有文獻，探討路網空間與大眾運輸導向發展潛力之關聯性，以臺中鐵路高架沿線場站周邊地區，歸納出大眾運輸導向潛力因子及路網空間之相關因子，透過Spearman相關係數分析，得出以台中鐵路高架化沿線場站周邊地區，其大眾運輸導向式之發展潛力(一)空間路網因子與密度因子有關聯性，然而與土地混合使用及都市設計因子，較無關聯性；(二)沿線場站周邊地區密度及土地混和使用程度較高，都市設計程度因子較低；(三)路網型態越偏向網格狀，可及性越大。

Transit Oriented Development (TOD), in response to the industrial revolution since the 18th century, has over-concentrated the population in cities, causing serious environmental pollution in the city, and increasing the number of vehicles owned by the population due to soaring population. Contaminating the environment further, in order to solve this phenomenon, the United States first proposed the development of satellite towns, through the mass transit chain, not only reduce the use of private vehicles but also to reduce the urban population.
Since the Taiwan Railway Administration started to promote the rapid transit in 2005, it has added several simple commuter stations in addition to the existing stations to reduce the distance between stations and has used the mode of dense departure to increase the number of trips. Land development in the surrounding area of the station was able to grow. The Taichung area changed the appearance of the entire city in 2016. Through the elevated transit, the number of stations increased from the original 5 stations to 10, and the surrounding land in the future Development will have considerable development.
This study collects and analyzes existing literature to explore the relationship between road network space and urban development. In order to find out the relevant factors of the public transport orientation and road network space around the stations along the elevated railway line of the Taichung Railway, the Spearman correlation coefficient analysis (1) The spatial road network factor is related to the density factor, but it is not related to the mixed use of land and urban design factors; (2) The density of surrounding areas along the station along the line and the degree of land use are higher, and the degree of urban design is higher. The lower the factor is; (3) The more skewed the grid pattern is, the greater the accessibility.

第一章 緒論-----1
第一節 研究背景、緣起及目的-----1
第二節 研究範圍-----3
第三節 研究流程與方法-----5
第二章 文獻回顧-----7
第一節 新都市主義-----7
第二節 大眾運輸導向-----14
第三節 空間型構理論-----18
第三章 研究設計-----31
第一節 相關研究方法介紹-----31
第二節 研究資料建置與研究限制-----32
第三節 研究假設及分析模式建構-----36
第四節 案例地區簡介-----38
第四章 實證分析-----49
第一節 各場站周邊空間因子分析-----49
第二節 Spearman相關係數分析-----87
第五章 結論與建議-----92
第一節 結論-----92
第二節 建議-----95
參考資料-----97
附錄-----101

中文文獻
1.台中市都市發展局. (2017). 台中市政府數位地圖館. Retrieved from
http://gishub.taichung.gov.tw/
2.交通部鐵路改建工程局. (2006). 臺中都會區鐵路高架捷運化計畫. Retrieved from
https://www.rrb.gov.tw/04100.aspx?id=5&lan=ch
3.行政院經濟設計委員會. (1977). 鄰里單元模型之研究 (規劃研究報告). (都市規劃處, Ed.)
(Vol. 66(134.359). 台北市: 行政院經濟設計委員會.
4.李家儂. (2003). 都會區大眾運輸導向發展之規劃模式. 國立臺北大學.
5.李家儂, &賴宗裕. (2005). 台灣地區大眾運輸導向發展之落實— 借鏡美國的實施經驗. 都市
交通季刊, 20(3), 1–16.
6.李家儂, &謝翊楷. (2015). 以空間型構法則及步行導向理念檢視TOD 區內土地使用配置的合
理性. 運輸計劃季刊, 44(1), 1~424.
7.李琦華, &林峰田. (2007). 台灣聚落的空間型構法則分析. 中華民國建築學會建築學報,
(60), 27–45.
8.杜雲龍. (2000). 大眾運輸導向之都市發展策略研擬─以淡海新市鎮開發案為例. 國立臺北大
學.
9.林嘉慧. (2008). 大眾運輸導向發展引導都市空間再造之策略研究. 中國文化大學.
10.施亭伃. (2006). 大眾運輸導向發展對捷運運量之影響─台北捷運系統實證研究. 國立臺北大
學.
11.唐仁梂. (2010). 從大眾運輸導向發展理論(TOD)談臺中縣市合併後城市競爭力與都市土地開
發之研究. 臺中市: 中興地政事務所.
12.唐曉彤. (2007). 淺析“新都市主義”理論的演變. 高等建築教育, 16(4), 39–41.
13.國土測繪中心. (2006). 國土利用調查成果圖. Retrieved from
http://lui.nlsc.gov.tw/Home/Content.aspx?MUID=9fc78e6b-f491-453f-89c2-
8aefc14ef16b
14.張有恆. (1994). 都市公共運輸 (初版). 台北: 華泰文化事業公司.
15.張惟皓, &張效通. (2015). 以空間型構法則分析都市型態之研究架構. 健康與建築雜誌,
2(1), 1–9.
16.張學孔, 張馨文, &陳雅雯. (2013). 綠色交通 慢活‧友善‧永續：以人為本的運輸環境，讓城
市更流暢、生活更精采. 中興工程出版.
17.陳佩菁. (2006). 大眾運輸導向發展站區評估模式之研究-以台中都會區捷運運輸系統為例.
逢甲大學.
18.陳嘉茹. (2008). 以空間型構法則與階層線性模式探討交通路網結構對都市商業型態影響之研
究. 國立成功大學.
19.葉峻宏. (2012). 以空間型構法則探討大型零售不動產空間配置模式之研究. 國立臺北大學.
20.鄒克萬, &黃書偉. (2009). 路網結構對都市商業發展空間分布關係之研究─空間型構法則之應
用. 都市與計劃, 36(1), 81–99.
21.潘雪玲, &謝政頴. (2007). 以空間型構理論應用於都市空間變遷之研究─以埔里鎮為例. In
第11屆科技整合管理研討會 (pp. 498–516).
22.蘇智峰. (1999). 空間型態之內在組構邏輯─SPACE SYMTAX(空間形構法則)之介紹. 建築向
度：設計與理論學刊, 創刊號01(數位、文化與建築), 43–53.

英文文獻
1.Arendt, R., Arrington, G. B., Barnett, J., Bothwell, S., Calthorpe, P.,
Comitta, T. J., …Zimmerman, T. (1996). The Charter of the New Urbanism.
Washington, DC: Congress for the New Urbanism.
2.Asami, Y., Kubat, A. S., Kitagawa, K., &Iida, S. (2003). Introducing the
third dimension on Space Syntax: Application on the historical Istanbul. In
6th International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 41–48). ITU Faculty of
Architecture.
3.Baran, P. K., Rodríguez, D. A., &Khattak, A. J. (2008). Space syntax and
walking in a new urbanist and suburban neighbourhoods. Journal of Urban
Design, 13(1), 5–28.
4.Barnett, J. H. (2005). Early Writings on Graph Theory:Euler Circuits and The
K¨onigsberg Bridge Problem. Colorado State.
5.Buescher, J. (2011). Home Sales During the Great Depression.
6.Calthorpe, P. (1992). Transit-Oriented Development Design Guidelines: City
of San Diego Land Guidance System. Council.
7.Calthorpe, P. (1993). The next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and
the American dream. New York: Princeton architectural press.
8.Cervero, R. (2007). Transit-oriented development’s ridership bonus: a
product of self-selection and public policies. Environment and Planning,
A39(9), 2068–2085.
9.Cervero, R., &Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: density,
diversity, and design. Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199–219.
10.Cervero, R., Murphy, S., Ferrel, Lc., Goguts, N., Tsai, Y.-H., Arrington,
G. B., …Witenstein, N. (2004). TCRP Report 102: Transit-Oriented
Development in the Unites States:Experiences,Challenges, and Prospect.
Washington,D.C.
11.Claudia, P. (2008). New Urbanism,Comparative Study Between Cases In
America,Europe And Asia. National Taipei University of Technology.
12.Ha, E., Joo, Y., &Jun, C. (2011). An empirical study on sustainable
walkability indices for transit-oriented development by using the analytic
network process approach. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 15(2),
137–146.
13.Hillier, B. (2007). Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of
Architecture. London.
14.Hillier, B., &Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. New York: Press
Syndicate of the University od Cambridge.
15.Hillier, B., &Iida, S. (2005). Network and psychological effects in urban
movement. In International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (pp.
475–490). London: Springer.
16.Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., &Xu, J. (1993). Natural
movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement.
Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(1), 29–66.
17.Hillier, B., &Vaughan, L. (2007). The City as One Thing. Progress in
Planning, 67(3), 205–230.
18.Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York:
Random House.
19.Jiang, B. (2012). Axwoman 6.0: An ArcGIS extension for urban morphological
analysis. University of Gavle.
20.Jiang, B., Claramuntz, C., &Klarqvist, B. (2000). Integration of space
syntax into GIS for modelling urban spaces. International Journal of
Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2(3–4), 161–171.
21.O’Sullivan, S., &Morrall, J. (1996). Walking Distances to and from Light-
Rail Transit Stations. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the
Transportation Research Board, 1538(Pedestrian and Bicycle Research), 19–
26.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3141/1538-03
22.Ozbil, A., &Peponis, J. (2012). The effects of urban form on walking to
transit. In Eigth International Space syntax Symposium (pp. 1–15).
23.Ozbil, A., Peponis, J., &Bafna, S. (2009). The effects of street
configuration on transit ridership. In 7th International Space Syntax
Symposium. Stockholm: KTH School of Architecture and the Built Environment.
24.Qin, Q. (2016). Exploring Pedestrian Movement Patterns with Urban
Enviormental Factors in Beijing. The Pennsylvania State University.
25.Shields, R. (2012). Cultural Topology:The Seven Bridges of Ko¨nigsburg,
1736. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4–5), 43–57.
26.Shlomo, A., &Alejandro M, B. (2016). The spatial structure of American
cities: The great majority of workplaces are no longer in CBDs,employment
sub-centers, or live-work communities. Cities, 51, 21–35.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.031
27.Spears, S., Boarnet, M. G., Handy, S., &Rodier, C. (2014). Impacts of Land-
Use Mix on Passenger Vehicle Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Policy, 9,
30.
28.Trefil, J. (1993). A Scientist in the City. Bantam Doubleday Dell
Publishing Group.
29.White, M., Attorney, Freilich, Leitner, &Carlisle. (1999). LEGAL RESEARCH
DIGEST. Transit Cooperative Research Program, 5–6.
30.Zar, J. H. (1984). Critical Values of the Spearman’s Ranked Correlation
Coefficient (rs)Table B.19. Biostatistical Analysis, 26.