臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來國防部順應環境變遷，實施一連串的組織改革，從精實案到精進案再至再精進案，其目的乃係透過此一變革，進而達到量少、質精之目標。在推行過程中如何汰壟留優，達到人員素質之提升，所透過之方式即是考核。九十五年起在陸軍在司令的大力推動下，實施本職學能之鑑測，其考量乃在於司令認為目前部隊之問題，其核心係因幹部的「本職學能」不夠專精，忽略身為專業軍人領導部隊應具備的看家本領，郤捨本逐末去從事營外的「終身學習」，因此希望回歸本務面，從幹部最基本之工作職能進行考核，透過公開、公正、公平之鑑測方式，了解幹部之本質學能程度，並以此作為其進修、升遷、考核之依據。
本調查研究旨在了解軍中志願役軍士官兵，在二次實施本職學能鑑測期間，鑑測時工作實務干擾程度是否會對鑑測成績有所影響、進而產生的對個人未來留營意願及升遷期待的反應程度狀況做整體研究，主要目的乃在探討於工兵部隊對進行鑑測的軍士官兵在本職學能的認知及努力程度將軍事基礎教育的志願役(士兵及上校）在接受本職學能鑑測後影響鑑測成績相關因素為何，藉問卷的題目及深度訪談分析找出陸軍工兵官科志願役官士兵本職學能鑑測的重點，以作為未來各級幹部給長官做為升遷、考核管理上的參考依據，以達成「嚴淘汰、嚴考核」為指標。研究的對象乃是針對工兵官科志願役士兵到上校階層，再由任職單位、職務、駐地區分以個人報進系統或教學輔導列車等進行問卷調查及深度訪談。
國軍目前對於本職學能鑑測的研究參考文獻幾乎是無相關性之研究，並且尚未發展出適合針對本職學能鑑測情境的量表，故本研究欲藉著透過問卷調查方式、深度訪談方式，加上蒐集到的文獻理論依據，找出影響鑑測成績的因素，並根據這些因素編製本職學能鑑量表，希望藉由發展出來的量表協助了解工兵官科志願役官士兵在鑑測期間影響鑑測成績之因素，透過了解鑑測成績的高低程度，藉以提昇志願役軍士官兵工作績效，及期能在爾後軍事教育、訓練發展上能提供參酌。

In the recent years, in order to adapt to the current society and environment, the department of defense implemented a series of organization reformation, The purpose is to be able to achieve the goal of less quantity but higher quality through these reformations. During the reformation, the way they weed out the weak links in order to improve the quality is through performance report. Currently (Year 2006 and 2007), under the supervision of the army commander, he issued an order to examine the basic occupational skill of the professional soldiers. He reasoned that the main problem of current military had started, because the leaders are lacking their basic occupational skill, they lack the basic leadership ability of a professional soldier, yet they decide to overlook their basic responsibility and pursue further education outside the military. Due to this concern, the commander wants to re-examine the basic occupational skills of these leaders, and understand the level of their basic occupation skill, and use these as a base of their promotion, performance report, and their pursuit of further education.

The purpose of this research report is to understand those in the military (including professional officers, NCOs, and soldiers) during their basic occupational skill examination. This research is to investigate whether daily work in the military will affect the performance during the examination, and how this will affect individual''s response towards promotion and staying in the military. The main purpose is to explore and discuss the engineer army''s understanding and the amount of effort they put in towards the basic occupational skill examination. Through survey and interviews, this research finds out the important aspects of professional officers, NCOs, and soldiers'' basic occupational examination and what would affect their performance during the examination. In order for their superiors to use these information as the main reference for their future promotion and performance report. All these done are to be able to weed out the bad ones and evaluate their performance on a high standard. The main targets of this research are those professional Army Engineers, ranging from soldiers to colonel, and further categorize them by their employing units, ranks, and districts. Then through individual report system and counseling to survey and interview these people.

Currently, the military has no actual research references that are directly related to the basic occupational skill examination, and has yet to develop any base or grading scale that are suitable for the examination. Thus this research relied on survey and detailed interview, in addition to some references, in order to find out the factors that will affect professional soldier’s performance during the examination. With the above information, the military tried to use them as a base to develop the initial grading scale for the basic occupational skill examination, hoping the scale will aid the military in understanding why these factors will affect each of their performance during the examination. Through understanding the difference in performance in the examination, the military hope to increase professional soldiers’ performance at work, and also to use this information as a reference in future military education and training.

中文摘要Ⅰ
英文摘要Ⅲ
目錄Ⅴ
表目錄Ⅶ
圖目錄Ⅸ
第一章　緒論1
1.1　背景1
1.2　研究範圍與限制1
1.3　重要名詞詮釋2
1.4　研究流程4
1.5　研究步驟與流程5
第二章　文獻探討6
2.1　本職學能6
2.2　考績功能7
2.3　考績原則9
2.4　績效評估管理10
第三章　研究方法13
3.1　研究架構13
3.2　研究假設14
3.3　研究變項定義與衡量14


3.4　問卷設計與訪談16
3.5　資料分析方法18
3.6　訪談資料整理與分析22
第四章　實證分析28
4.1　信度分析28
4.2　敘述性統計分析30
4.3　研究假設檢定42
4.4　研究假說檢定結果52
4.5　訪談結果發現與討論54
第五章　結論與建議64
5.1　結論64
5.2　建議65
第六章　參考文獻68
附錄一　問卷調查表71
附錄二　訪談同意書77
附錄四　96、96年本職學能鑑測項目比較分析86
附錄五　美軍部隊體能訓練87
附錄六　本職學能鑑測合格簽證91

[1]黄文隆、黄龍等編著，2005，迴歸分析，滄海書局，台中
[2]廖佩珊編著，2005，迴歸分析，瑞霖企業管理顧問有限公司
[3]張紘炬、吳忠武等編著，2004，現代統計學二版，華泰文化
[4]楊世瑩著，2005，SPSS統計分析實務，旗標出版有限公司
[5]史麗珠、林莉華編譯，2005，統計學，學富文化事業有限公司
[6]吳明隆編著，2005，SPSS統計應用學習實務問卷分析與應用統計第二版，知城數位科技股份有限公司
[7]傳粹馨(1998)，影響積差相關係數與信度係數之因素。教育學刊。
[8]傳粹馨(2002)，信度、Aplha係數與相關議題之研究。教育學刊。
[9]李旺然(2006)，家長性別期待對子女資訊學習機會之影響研究－以高雄市某完全中學為例。義守大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
[10]陸軍工兵學校網頁。
[11]黃仲強(2005)，壓力來源、因應行為與身心反應狀況之探討－以陸軍工兵學校為例，義守大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
[12]蔡傳聖（2006），陸軍工兵學校10月份月會專題報告資料－美軍部隊體能訓練。
[13]吳定安（2006），從95、96年本職學能鑑測成果分析－探討學校基礎教育之精進作法。
[14]邱皓政（2000），量化研究與統計分析。台北：五南。
[15]張紹勳（1998），SPSS Fod Windows　多變量統計分析。台北：松崗電腦圖書公司。
[16]林生傳(2003)，教育研究法－全方位的統整與分析。台北：心理。
[17]http://law.mnd.mil.tw國防法規資料庫網頁「國軍軍官士官考績作業規定 (2004.03.29修正)」。
[18]施金山（2003），私立東海大學公共行政研究所碩士論文，我國公務人員考績制度之研究—兼論行政機關績效獎金制度。
[19]張潤書(2002)，行政學，三民書局。
[20]公務人員考績法（90.06.20 總統令）。
[21]林水波（1989），考績制度-理論研析與經驗印證，五南圖書出版公司。
[22]蔡良文(1999)，人事行政學，台北市：五南圖書公司。
[23]許士軍（2000），走向創新時代的組織績效評估—績效評估，天下文化。
[24]高惠松(2001)，平衡計分卡之規劃與設計—以基隆港務局為例，海洋大
學航運管理學系碩士論文。
[25]楊長林、黃靜蓮（2001），應用平衡計分卡於系所整體績效衡量，龍華技
術學院工業工程與管理系。
[26]李建華（1989），利潤中心的制度與應用，清華管理科學圖書中心。
[27]丘昌泰(2002)，邁向績效導向的地方政府管理，研考雙月刊。
[28]林生傳(2003)，教育研究法－全方位的統整與分析。台北：心理。
[29]French，W.L.1987 The Personnel Management Process.
[30]Steel，B.S.1985 “Participative Performance Appraisal in Washington:An Assessment of Post-Implemention Receptivity，”Public Personnel Management Journal
[31]Brinkerhoff＆Kanter，1980；Huber，1983
[32]DeNisi，Cafferty ＆ Meglino，1984；Williams，DeNisi ＆ Blencoe，1985。
[33]DeCotiis ＆ Petit，1978
[34]Fombrun ＆ Land，1983;Locher ＆ Teel，1977
[35]Evans，H.，Ashworth，G.，Gooch，G.，Davies，1996， Dec.，〝Who needs Performance Management? 〞， Management Accounting
[36]Bacal，Robert，1999，〝Performance Management 〞，McGraw-Hill Companies，Inc.
[37]Crocker,L., & Algina, J.(1996). Introduction to classical and modern testtheory. Chicago: Holt. Rinehart and Winston.
[38]Fan, X., & Thompson, B. (2001). Confidence intervals about score reliability coefficient, plesase: An EPM guidelines editorial. Educational and Psychological Measuerement, 61(4),
[39]Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measuement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development