跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.124) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/06/05 01:00
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:洪莉玲
研究生(外文):Hung, Li-Lin
論文名稱:蒜素(Allicin)水溶液對臨床抗藥性菌株之抗菌活性評估
論文名稱(外文):Assessment Antimicrobial Activity of Allicin Aqueous Solution against Clinical Drug-Resistant Bacteria
指導教授:湯宏仁李松泰李松泰引用關係
指導教授(外文):Tang, Hung-JenLee, S. T.
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:南台科技大學
系所名稱:生物科技系
學門:生命科學學門
學類:生物科技學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:102
畢業學年度:101
語文別:中文
論文頁數:101
中文關鍵詞:蒜素抗藥性菌株抗菌活性
外文關鍵詞:AllicinDrug-Resistant BacteriaAntimicrobial Activity
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:2282
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:72
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
近年來由於抗生素的濫用,導致抗藥性菌株逐年增加,造成病人出現無抗生素可用的嚴重現象,促使醫學界不斷尋求新的抗生素替代性產品。大蒜為天然抗菌植物,其有效抗菌成份來自於大蒜受到擠壓後釋出的含硫化合物,即為蒜素(Allicin)。本研究目的為檢測大蒜水萃物--蒜素對抗藥性菌株之抑菌功效與生物活性,評估其作為抗生素替代物之可能性。
本研究檢測之抗菌產品為由廠商提供之蒜素水溶液,廠商之製備方式是先從大蒜粉提煉純化出蒜素(Allicin),再使用專利的超臨界流體萃取系統來濃縮蒜素水溶液,使蒜素水溶液濃度達到1000 μg/ml時分流並收集。測試菌株使用十種共一百株,經脈衝式電泳(Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis ; PFGE)基因分型之抗藥性臨床菌株,以測試對不同基因型之同種菌株的抗菌結果。本研究以瓊脂紙錠擴散法(agar disc diffusion method)作蒜素水溶液初步抗菌活性分析,再進一步偵測最低抑菌濃度(minimum inhibitory concentration; MIC )與最低殺菌濃度(minimum bacteriocidal concentration; MBC )及MBC與MIC之比值(MBC/MIC ratio),接著以細菌之0.5、1、2、4倍MIC值進行殺菌效率與動態變化試驗(time-killing test)。
抗菌活性分析結果顯示,以紙錠擴散法偵測蒜素水溶液對所有測試之菌株皆產生明顯抑制圈,MIC介於15.6至125 μg/ml之間,MBC則介於31.25至500 μg/ml之間。且MBC與MIC之比值皆介於1到4 之間,顯示其作用模式可能為殺菌作用。殺菌效率動態變化試驗結果顯示,1倍MIC之蒜素水溶液對革蘭氏陽性菌中之MRSA、MSSA、Staphylococcus epidermidis在24小時可完全抑制,但對VRE、VSE則須2倍MIC以上濃度方可完全抑制; 1倍MIC之蒜素水溶液對革蘭氏陰性菌Pandrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii、K. pneumonia (ESBL) 、 E. coli (ESBL) 、 Salmonella、 P. aeruginosa在2至8小時即可完全抑制,對全部十種測試菌株皆可持續抑制達48小時。
接著,我們以儲存於四種溫度之蒜素水溶液,在儲存後連續每天測定蒜素抗菌活性以觀察蒜素水溶液儲存後剩餘之生物活性,依抗菌活性衰減時間來計算其生物半衰期。結果顯示,儲存於室溫(22~23℃)之蒜素水溶液對S. aureus ATCC25923抗菌活性檢測換算之生物半衰期為6.6天,對E. coli ATCC25922之生物半衰期為4.3天。儲存於4℃之蒜素水溶液對S. aureus ATCC25923抗菌活性檢測換算之生物半衰期延長為19.6天,對E. coli ATCC25922之生物半衰期延長為18.3天。蒜素水溶液儲存在-20℃與-80℃之抗菌活性檢測換算之生物半衰期可維持1年半以上。為避免蒜素水溶液受氧化而失活故以數種方式隔絕氧氣,結果顯示添加抗氧化劑維生素C與維生素E、真空包裝、加礦物油隔絕空氣均無法延長生物半衰期,故低溫儲存仍為我們所測得之最有效延長蒜素水溶液生物半衰期的方式。
In the recent years, abuse of antibiotics has caused drug-resistant bacteria strains increasing every year. Due to a lack of effective antibiotics, the research of new antibiotic alternatives is in demand. Garlic is a natural anti-bacterial plant. The effective antibacterial ingredient Allicin is a sulfur compound from extrusion of garlic. This study is to assess garlic water extraction of Allicin as an antibiotic alternative product by detecting its antibacterial effects against drug-resistant strains and biological stability.
The Allicin aqueous solution was extracted from garlic powder, and then concentrated garlic aqueous solution was collected at an Allicin concentration of 1000 ppm by patented supercritical fluid extraction system. We used 100 drug-resistant clinical strains of ten species, prepared by PFGE genotyping, to test the antibacterial results against different genotypes of the same strain species. The experiment applied agar disc diffusion method for preliminary antibacterial activity analysis, and further detected the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), and the ratio of MBC and MIC. Then, all of the strains were tested to find the bactericidal efficiency and dynamic change (time-killing test) according to 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 times of their MIC values.
Preliminary antibacterial activity analysis showed that all strains had apparent inhibition zones with agar disc diffusion method. The MICs were between 15.6 and 125 μg /ml, and the MBCs were between 31.3 and 500 μg /ml. The ratios of MBC to MIC were between 1 and 4, and implied their mode of action was bactericidal effect. Dynamic change of bactericidal efficiency showed that the MIC concentration of Allicin aqueous solution with MIC concentrations can completely inhabit MRSA, MSSA, and Staphylococcus epidermidis of the Gram-positive bacteria in the first 24 hours, and five species of Gram-negative bacteria in 2 to 8 hours. The above inhibition effects remained 48 hours. Complete inhibition of VRE and VSE needed more than double MIC concentrations of Allicin aqueous solution.
The biological half-life was determined by the antibacterial activity decay time after some storage duration with stored in specific environment. With room temperature storage (22~23℃), the biological half-life of Allicin aqueous solution against standard S. aureus ATCC25923 strain was 6.6 days, and against standard E. coli ATCC25922 strain was 4.3 days. With 4℃ storage, its biological half-life against standard S. aureus ATCC25923 strain extended to 19.6 days, and against standard E. coli ATCC25922 was 18.3 days. The biological half-life of Allicin aqueous solution stored in -20 ℃ to -80 ℃ can extend to 1.5 years or more. Isolating the Allicin aqueous solution from oxygen by adding vitamin C and vitamin E, vacuum package, or immersion in mineral oil did not extend its biological half-life. Therefore, low temperature storage was the best way to prolong the biological half-life of Allicin aqueous solution.
中文摘要............................................................................................................................i
英文摘要..........................................................................................................................iii
誌謝...................................................................................................................................v
目次................................................................................................................................. vi
表目錄............................................................................................................viii
圖目錄..........................................................................................................................x
附圖目錄....................................................................................................................xi
縮寫對照表...................................................................................................................xii
第一章 文獻回顧.............................................................................................................1
1-1 細菌的構造與分類............................................................................................1
1-2 抗生素的作用機轉與發展........................................................................…....3
1-2-1 抗生素的發展史.....................................................................................3
1-2-2 抗生素的作用機制與分類.....................................................................4
1-3 細菌對抗生素產生抗藥性的方式.......................................................….........7
1-4 抗藥性菌株流行現況........................................................................................8
1-5 大蒜Garlic (Allium Sativum)介紹 .................................................................10
1-6 大蒜有效抗菌成份蒜素(Allicin)介紹............................................................11
1-7 蒜素的醫學應用..............................................................................................12
1-7-1 蒜素的抗細菌功效...............................................................................13
1-7-2 蒜素抗黴菌功效...................................................................................13
1-7-3 蒜素抗原蟲功效...................................................................................13
1-8 蒜素水溶液的穩定性探討............................................................................13
第二章 研究目的...........................................................................................................15
第三章 材料與方法.......................................................................................................16
3-1 研究架構..........................................................................................................16
3-2 研究材料..........................................................................................................17
3-2-1 菌株………….......................................................................................17
3-2-2 培養用培養基及試劑與耗材..............................................................19
3-2-3 儀器裝置...............................................................................................20
3-3 實驗方法.....................................................................….................................21
3-3-1大蒜水溶液製造流程............................................................................21
3-3-2 細菌培養.....................................................................................21
3-3-3 瓊脂紙錠擴散試驗(Kirby-Bauer Disk-diffusion test).....................22
3-3-4最低抑菌濃度測定(Minimum inhibitory concentration;MIC).....24
3-3-5 最低殺菌濃度測定(Minimum bactericidal concentration; MBC)….25
3-3-6 殺菌效率、動態變化試驗(Time-kill curves).................................25
3-3-7 蒜素水溶液檢測生物活性試驗……………………………………26
第四章 實驗結果...........................................................................................................29
4-1蒜素水溶液之瓊脂紙錠擴散試驗..................................................................29
4-1-1蒜素水溶液對革蘭氏陽性菌之瓊脂紙錠擴散試驗……..…………..29
4-1-2蒜素水溶液對革蘭氏陰性菌之瓊脂紙錠擴散試驗………………....30
4-2蒜素水溶液之培養液稀釋試驗.......................................................................32
4-2-1蒜素水溶液對革蘭氏陽性菌之最低抑菌濃度與最低殺菌濃度........32
4-2-2蒜素水溶液對革蘭氏陰性菌之最低抑菌濃度與最低殺菌濃度........32
4-3蒜素水溶液之殺菌效率、動態變化試驗……………………….....................33
4-3-1蒜素水溶液對革蘭氏陽性菌之殺菌效率、動態變化試驗................. 33
4-3-2蒜素水溶液對革蘭氏陰性菌之殺菌效率、動態變化試驗.................34
4-4蒜素水溶液的生物活性試驗...........................................................................34
第五章 討論.....................................................………………..………………………37
第六章 結論.......................................................………………………………………44
參考文獻..........................................................………………………………………...45
1. Ryan KJ, Ray CG. Sherris Medical Microbiology. 4th ed. McGraw Hill; 2004, p. 232–3.
2. Talbot GH, Bradley J, Edwards JE Jr., et al. Antimicrobial Availability Task Force of the infectious Diseases Society of America. Bad bugs need drugs: an update on the development pipeline from the Antimicrobial Antimicrobial Availability Task Force of the infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42(5): 657-68.
3. Moellering RC Jr. Vancomycin: A 50-Year Reassessment. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42(Suppl 1): S3–S4.
4. http://faculty.ccbcmd.edu/courses/bio141/lecguide/unit4/innate/u1fig10b.html
5. Talaro KP. An Introduction to Cell and Procaryotic Cell Structure and Function. In Foundations in Microbiology: Basic Principles. 6th ed. McGraw Hill; 2006, p. 99-101.
6. Brown K. Penicillin Man: Alexander Fleming and the Antibiotic Revolution. Sutton Publishing; 2004.
7. Houbraken J, Frisvad JC, Samson RA. Fleming's penicillin producing strain is not Penicillium chrysogenum but P. rubens. IMA Fungus 2011; 2(1): 87-95.
8. Drews J. Drug Discovery: A Historical Perspective. Science 2000; 287(5460): 1960-4.
9. Saxon W. Anne Miller, 90, first patient who was saved by penicillin. http://www.nytimes.com/1999/06/09/us/anne-miller-90-first-patient-who-was-saved-by-penicillin.html.
10. Fischbach MA, Walsh CT. Antibiotics for emerging pathogens. Science 2009; 325(5944): 1089-93.
11. Giuliani A, Pirri G, Nicoletto SF. Antimicrobial peptides: an overview of a promising class of therapeutics. Cent Eur J Biol 2007; 2(1): 1–33.
12. Bergeron J, Ammirati M, Danley D, et al. Glycylcyclines bind to the high-affinity tetracycline ribosomal binding site and evade Tet(M)- and Tet(O)-mediated ribosomal protection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996; 40(9): 2226–8.
13. Shinabarger D. Mechanism of action of the oxazolidinone antibacterial agents. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 1999; 8(8): 1195–202.
14. Tenover FC. Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria. The American Journal of Medicine 2006; 119(6A): S3–S10.
15. Calderon CB, Sabundayo BP. Antimicrobial Classifications: Drugs for Bugs. In Schwalbe R, Steele-Moore, editors. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocols. CRC Press; 2007.
16. Finberg RW, Moellering RC, Tally FP, et al. The importance of bactericidal drugs: future directions in infectious disease. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39(9): 1314–20.
17. Carattoli A. Resistance plasmid families in Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 2227–38.
18. Carattoli A, Miriagou V, Bertini A. Replicon typing of plasmids encoding resistance to newer beta-lactams. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006; 12: 1145–8.
19. Wright GD, Bacterial resistance to antibiotics: Enzymatic degradation and modification. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2005; 57: 1451–70.
20. Webber MA, Piddock LJ. The importance of efflux pumps in bacterial antibiotic resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003; 51: 9-11.
21. Parker MT, Jevons MP. A survey of Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 1964; 40(Suppl): 170-8.
22. Tenover FC, Biddle JW, Lancaster MV. Increasing resistance to vancomycin and other glycopeptides in Staphylococcus aureus. Emerg Infect Dis 2001; 7(2):327-32.
23. Go ES, Urban C, Burns J, et al. Clinical and molecular epidemiology of Acinetobacter infections sensitive only to polymyxin B and sulbactam. Lancet 1994; 344(8933): 1329–32.
24. Hsueh PR, Chen ML, Sun CC, et al. Antimicrobial Drug Resistance in Pathogens Causing Nosocomial Infections at a University Hospital in Taiwan, 1981-1999. Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 8(1): 63–8.
25. Hsueh PR, Liu YC, Yang D, et al. Multicenter surveillance of antimicrobial resistance of major bacterial pathogens in intensive care units in 2000 in Taiwan. Microb Drug Resist 2001; 7(4): 373–82.
26. Mackenzie FM, Bruce J, Van Looveren M, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in European hospitals: report from the ARPAC study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006; 12: 1185–92.
27. Jones RN. Global epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance among community acquired and nosocomial pathogens: a five-year summary from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997–2001). Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 24(1): 121–34.
28. Felmingham D, White AR, Jacobs MR, et al. The Alexander Project: the benefits from a decade of surveillance. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 56(Suppl 2): ii3–ii21.
29. Hsueh PR, Teng LJ, Chen CY, et al. Pandrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii causing nosocomial infections in a university hospital, Taiwan. Emerg infect Dis 2002; 8(8), 827-32.
30. Mankial VM, Landman D, Suauina G, et. al. Endemic carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter species in Brooklyn, New York: citywide prevalence, interinstitutional spread, and relation to antibiotic usage. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 31: 101-6.
31. Garnacho-Montero J,Ortiz-Leyba C, Jimenez-Jimenez FJ, et al. Treatment of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) with intravenous colistin: a comparison with imipenem-susceptible VAP. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36(9):1111-8.
32. Saballs M, Pujol M, Tubau F, et al. Rifampicin/imipenem combination in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2006; 58(3): 697-700.
33. Prance G, Nesbitt M. The Cultural History of Plants. Routledge, New York; 2005, p. 219‐21.
34. Sinatra S. A clove a day keeps the doctor away. http://www.drsinatra.com/a-clove -a-day-keeps-the-doctor-away.
35李時珍,第二十六卷、菜部。本草綱目。http://www.theqi.com/cmed/oldbook/book132/b132_29.html.
36. Cavallito JC, Bailey JH. Allicin, the antibacterial principle of Allium sativum. I. isolation, physical aroperties and antibacterial action. J Am Chem Soc 1944; 66 (11): 1950-1.
37. Calvey EM, Roach JA, Block E. Supercritical fluid chromatography of garlic (Allium sativum) extracts with mass spectrometric identification of allicin. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1994; 32(3): 93–6.
38. Allicin.Phytochemicals.http://www.phytochemicals.info/phytochemicals/allicin.php.
39. Ankri S, Mirelman D. Antimicrobial properties of allicin from garlic. Microbes Infect 1999; 1(2): 125–9.
40. Gautam R, Saklani A, Jachak SM, Indian medicinal plants as a source of antimycobacterial agents, J Ethnopharmacol 2007; 110 (2): 200–34.
41. Aala F, Yusuf UK, Khodavandi A, et al. In vitro antifungal activity of allicin alone and in combination with two medications against six dermatophytic fungi. African J Microbio Res 2010; 4(5): 380–5.
42. Lawson LD, Gardner CD. Composition, stability, and bioavailability of garlic products used in a clinical trial. J Agric Food Chem 2005; 53(16): 6254–61.
43. Lu X, Samuelson DR, Rasco BA, et al. Antimicrobial effect of diallyl sulphide on Campylobacter jejuni biofilms. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012; 67(8): 1915–26
44. Lawson LD, Wang ZJ. Low allicin release from garlic supplements: a major problem due to the sensitivities of alliinase activity. J Agric Food Chem 2001; 49(5): 2592–9.
45. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests; Approved Standard-9th Edition. M2-A9. 2009. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
46. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard-7th Edition. M7-A7. 2009. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
47. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; 18th Information Supplement. M100-S18. 2008. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
48. Pankey GA, Sabath LD. Clinical relevance of bacteriostatic versus bactericidal mechanisms of action in the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38(6): 864–70.
49. Gatsing D, Tchakoute V, Ngamga D, et al. In vitro antibacterial activity of Crinum purpurascens Herb. leaf extract against the Salmonella species causing typhoid fever and its toxicological evaluation. Iran J Med Sci 2009; 34(2): 126-36.
50. Feldberg RS, Chang SC, Kotik AN, et al. In vitro mechanism of inhibition of bacterial growth by allicin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1988; 32(12): 1763-8.
51. Belguith H, Kthiri F, Chati A, et al. Study of the effect of aqueous garlic extract (Allium sativum) on some Salmonella serovars isolates. Emir J Food Agric 2010; 22 (3): 189-206.
52. Sivam GP. Protection against Helicobacter pylori and Other Bacterial Infections by Garlic. J Nutr 2001; 131(3): 1106S-8S.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關論文
 
1. 陳愛娥,「憲法對於未出生胎兒的保護-作為基本權保護義務的一例來觀察」,政大法學評論(台北),第58期(1997年12月),頁65~73。
2. 張嘉尹,「環境保護入憲之問題─德國經驗的初步考察」,月旦法學雜誌(台北),第38期(1998年7月),頁83~96。
3. 黃光輝,「臺灣環境影響評估法制最佳化芻議」,律師雜誌(台北), 292期(2004年1月),頁29~37。
4. 丘昌泰,「我國環境管制政策之研究:政策管理體系的觀點」,法商學報(台北),第31期(1995年8月),頁74~93。
5. 張嘉尹,「環境保護入憲之問題─德國經驗的初步考察」,月旦法學雜誌(台北),第38期(1998年7月),頁83~96。
6. 黃光輝,「臺灣環境影響評估法制最佳化芻議」,律師雜誌(台北), 292期(2004年1月),頁29~37。
7. 許耀明,「歐盟(憲法)公約草案中法律工具改革之評析」,月旦法學雜誌(台北),第106期(2004年3月),頁121~123。
8. 張桐銳,「從判斷餘地理論談司法審查的界限」,收錄於中華民國憲法學會:憲政時代(台北),第20卷第3期(1999年1月),頁74~76。
9. 張桐銳,「從判斷餘地理論談司法審查的界限」,收錄於中華民國憲法學會:憲政時代(台北),第20卷第3期(1999年1月),頁74~76。
10. 許耀明,「歐盟(憲法)公約草案中法律工具改革之評析」,月旦法學雜誌(台北),第106期(2004年3月),頁121~123。
11. 許宗力,「基本權程序保障功能的最新發展─評司法釋字488號解釋」,月旦法學雜誌(台北),第54期(1999年11月),頁153~160。
12. 許宗力,「基本權程序保障功能的最新發展─評司法釋字488號解釋」,月旦法學雜誌(台北),第54期(1999年11月),頁153~160。
13. 陳愛娥,「憲法對於未出生胎兒的保護-作為基本權保護義務的一例來觀察」,政大法學評論(台北),第58期(1997年12月),頁65~73。
14. 陳怡如,「司法院大法官正當法律程序原則違憲審查標準之探究」,弘光人文社會學報(台中),第6期(2007年5月),頁179~206。
15. 陳怡如,「司法院大法官正當法律程序原則違憲審查標準之探究」,弘光人文社會學報(台中),第6期(2007年5月),頁179~206。