臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究之目的在探討影響汽車駕駛人錯誤駕駛行為之因素。本研究首先藉由國內外相關文獻之探討，歸納出駕駛能力與駕駛負面情緒為影響錯誤駕駛行為之主要因素，其中駕駛能力包括駕駛技巧與防衛性駕駛能力兩個構面，而駕駛負面情緒則包括駕駛憤怒、駕駛緊張及駕駛厭惡等三個構面。本研究依據國外相關研究結果進行問卷設計，收集新竹地區304位汽車駕駛人之量測資料，並利用結構方程模式進行路徑分析。研究之結果顯示，錯誤駕駛行為之發生頻率與駕駛憤怒傾向及駕駛厭惡傾向均呈現正相關，而與防衛性駕駛能力則呈現顯著之負相關，其中又以駕駛憤怒傾向之影響為最大；而駕駛技巧與駕駛緊張傾向則無顯著影響。因此，欲減少錯誤駕駛行為之發生應以降低駕駛憤怒傾向為目標進行改善，如提倡「將心比心」、「多替他人著想」之觀念，以降低錯誤駕駛行為之發生機率，達到行車安全之目的。

This study was conducted to explore the factors that influence automobile drivers’ error driving behavior. The influential factors are categorized into two latent constructs according to the related literature. They are the ability of driving and the negative emotion of driving. The ability of driving is measured by Driver Skill Inventory (DSI) which includes two sub-constructs of driving skill and defensive driving. However, the negative emotion of driving is measured by the related items of Driving Behavior Inventory (DBI) which include three sub-constructs of driving annoyance, situation-specific tension, and dislike of driving. Error driving behavior is measured by the related items of Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ). The Structural Equation Model (SEM) is then used to analyze the paths between the constructs. The study results indicate that error driving behavior is influenced by driving annoyance, dislike of driving, and defensive driving, but is not significantly influenced by driving skill and situation-specific tension.

致謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 01
　　1.1 研究背景與動機 01
　　1.2 研究目的與內容 03
　　1.3 研究步驟與流程 03
第二章 文獻回顧 05
　　2.1 錯誤駕駛行為分析與界定 05
　　2.2 影響錯誤駕駛行為的因素 06
　　2.3 駕駛能力 08
　　　2.3.1駕駛能力的定義與量測 08
　　　2.3.2 駕駛能力相關文獻探討 09
　　2.4 駕駛行為量表 10
　　2.5 小結 11
第三章 研究架構與設計 12
　　3.1 研究假設與系統分析 12
　　3.2 研究變數之定義 14
　　　3.2.1駕駛能力之定義與衡量問項 14
　　　3.2.2負面情緒之定義與衡量問項 15
　　　3.2.3錯誤駕駛行為之定義與衡量問項 16
　　3.3 問卷抽樣與調查 16
　　3.4 研究方法 17
　　　3.4.1驗證型因素分析 17
　　　3.4.2信度分析 18
　　　3.4.3結構方程模式 18
第四章 問卷信效度分析與常態性檢定 21
　　4.1 抽測對象與地點 21
　　4.2 問卷初測結果 21
　　4.3 問卷實測樣本結構分析 23
　　4.4問卷各構面之信度與效度 25
　　　　4.4.1錯誤駕駛行為構面之信度與效度 25
　　　　4.4.2駕駛憤怒構面之信度與效度 27
　　　　4.4.3駕駛厭惡構面之信度與效度 27
　　　　4.4.4駕駛緊張構面之信度與效度 27
　　　　4.4.5駕駛技巧構面之信度與效度 28
　　　　4.4.6防衛性駕駛構面之信度與效度 28
　　4.5 觀察變項之常態性檢定 29
第五章 實證分析 32
　　5.1背景脈絡與各潛在變數之關係 32
　　　　5.1.1性別與各潛在變數的關係 32
　　　　5.1.2年齡與各潛在變數的關係 34
　　　　5.1.3事故有無與各潛在變數的關係 38
　　　　5.1.4駕車頻率與各潛在變數的關係 40
　　　　5.1.5駕車時間長度與各潛在變數的關係 43
　　5.2駕駛負面情緒、駕駛技能對錯誤駕駛行為之影響分析 45
　　　　5.2.1驗證性因素分析結果 45
　　　　5.2.2路徑分析 47
第六章 結論與建議 52
　　6.1 結論 52
　　6.2 建議 53
參考文獻 55
附錄一 57
附錄二 60
簡歷 63

1.交通部交通統計處，http://www.motc.gov.tw/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=stat.asp
2.內政部警政署，http://www.npa.gov.tw/count/main.htm
3.行政院衛生署，http://www.doh.gov.tw/cht/index.aspx
4.王偉，台北市汽車駕駛行為特性分析，國立台灣大學土木研究所，碩士論文，民國 75 年。
5.藍三印，道路交通心理學，警察大學叢書，警察大學，民國 80 年。
6.楊舜棠，應用駕駛行為量表探討駕訓教育對道路駕駛行為影響之研究，國立交通大學運輸科技與管理學系，碩士論文，民國96年
7.蔡維唐，影響小客車駕駛人駕駛技能與行為之因素研究，國立交通大學運輸科技與管理學系，碩士論文，民國97年。
8.邱皓政，結構方程模式-LISREL的理論、技術與應用，雙葉書廊有限公司，民國92年。
9.魏文欽，資料分析技巧：結構方程模式 AMOS、LISREL、SAS 之應用，雙葉書廊有限公司，民國96年。
10.榮泰生，AMOS 與研究方法，五南圖書出版股份有限公司，民國96年。
11.Subhash Sharma, Applied Multivariate Techniques, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1996.
12.Parker ,et al.“Intention to commit driving violations: An application of the theory planned behaviour”, Journal of Applied Psychology,77, pp. 94-101, 1992.
13.Per-Arne Rimmö , Lars Åberg , “On the distinction between violations and errors:sensation seeking associations” ,Transportation Research Part F, pp.151-166,1999.
14.Per-Arne Rimmö , “Aberrant driving behaviour: homogeneity of a four-factor structure in samples diVering in age and gender” , ERGONOMICS, VOL. 45, NO. 8, pp.569 - 582, 2002
15.Alessandra Bianchi, Heikki Summala, “The genetics of driving behavior : parents’driving style predicts their children’s driving stytle”, Accident Analysis and Prevention ,36,pp.655-659,2004.
16.Blockey, P. N. and Hartley, L. R., “Aberrant driving behaviour: errors and violations”, Ergonomics,38,pp.1759-1771,1995.
17.Bogozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academic of Marketing Science 16, 437-454.
18.Dianne Parker et al, “Elderly drivers and their accident:the Aging Driver Questionaire”, Accident Analysis and Prevention ,32,pp.751-759,1999.
19.Hugunin,R.D, “Do We Need Traffic Psychology Models”, Traffic and Transport psychology Theory and Application, 1997.
20.J. C. F. DE WINTER, P. A. WIERINGA, J. KUIPERS, J. A. MULDER , M. MULDER , ” Violations and errors during simulation-based driver training” , Ergonomics , Vol. 50, No. 1, pp.138–158 , 2007
21.Lajunen, T. & Summala, H., “Driving experience, personality, and skill and safety-motive dimensions in drivers's self-assessments”, Personality and Individual Differences, 19, pp. 307-318, 1995.
22.Mark J.M. Sullman , Michelle L. Meadows , Karl B. Pajo, “Aberrant driving behaviours amongst New Zealand truck drivers”,Transportation Research Part F, pp.217-232 ,2002.
23.Parker, D., Lajunen, T. & Stradling, S. “Attitudinal predictors of interpersonally aggressive violations on the road”, Transportation Research Part F, pp.11-24,1998.
24.S.J. Westerman, D. Haigney , “Individual differences in driver stress, error and violation”, Personality and Individual Differences, 29 , pp.981-998,2000.
25.Timo Lajunen and Heikki Summala, “Driving experience, personality, and skilland safety-motive dimensions in drivers’ self-assessments”, Personality and Individual Differences, 19 ,pp.307-318,2000.
26.Warren A. Harrison, “Investiigation of the driving experience of a sample of Victorian learener drivers”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, pp.885-891,2004.
27.Yagil, D. “Interpersonal antecedents of driver’s aggression”, Transportation Research Part F, 4, pp.110-131,2001.
28.Veysel Yilmaz , H. Eray Celik. “A model for explanation of personal attitudes toward traffic of candidate drivers attending drivers’ courses: Risky candidate driver’s attitude model”, Transportation Research Part F, 11 , pp.233–241, 2008
29.Diamantopoulos, A., Siguaw, J. A., 2000. Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.Rigdon, E., 1995. A necessary an sufficient identification rule for structural equation models estimated. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 369-383.
31.Tanaka, J. S., and Huba, G. J., 1989. A general coefficient of determination for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 233-239.
32.Hu, L. T., Bentler, P. M., 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit index in covariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
33.Kline, R. B., 1998. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.