臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年隨著數位轉型的興起，許多企業都紛紛提倡數位化運動。然而，企業在DT系統開發的專案管理實施過程中，通常面臨需求管理、技術整合和資源分配方面的挑戰。本研究旨在探討將設計科學數位創新模型（DSR-DI）應用於系統開發的實踐，我們用敏捷開發方法來增強DSR-DI流程模型形成一個新框架: Design Science Research in Digital Innovation for Service Development（DSR-DI SD），能為正在進行數位轉型的企業提供一個清晰的策略指導。

本研究的重點是應用DSR-DI SD框架開發雲端貿易業務管理系統，我們與一間從事三角貿易業務的公司合作，提出能管理和協調業務訂單的雲服務平台。系統設計採用客製化的業務管理系統和簽核引擎架構，並透過使用者的持續使用意圖分析評估其有效性，這樣的系統幫助我們提高DT專案管理的效率，同時也為相關領域提供了實際的案例。本研究理論貢獻建議企業在推動數位轉型時能參考本研究所提出之框架，對系統開發和數位轉型過程提供參考，始得企業更好地應用數位技術，更好地應對數位化時代的挑戰。

Enterprises are increasingly digitizing their systems but it is difficult to digitize development systems because of the need to management of requirements, technology integration and resource allocation. This study determines how Design Science Research in Digital Innovation model (DSR-DI) is applied in practice to address these challenges. DSR-DI is enhanced using agile development methods to create a framework that is called DSR-DI for Service Development (DSR-DI SD). This framework provides a strategy for enterprises undergoing digital transformation.

This study uses a DSR-DI SD framework to develop a Cloud-based Trade Business Management System. A partner firm that participates in triangular trade operations cooperated and a cloud service as a platform is proposed for managing and coordinating orders. The design includes customized features, such as a business management system and document approval engine architecture. Its effectiveness is verified using continuous usage intention analysis. The system allows a more effective digital transformation and is a practical example of how such transformation can be initiated in related fields.

This study highlights the importance of personalized strategies for companies that undergo digital transformation. The results of the study show that enterprises that undergo digital transformation benefit from the proposed framework. The study shows the system development and digital transformation processes and allows more effective use of digital technology to overcome the challenges of the digital era.

摘 要
ABSTRACT
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Research Background
1.2 Motivation and Purposes
1.3 Research Structure

CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Definition of Digital Transformation
2.1.1 Digitization V.S. Digitalization
2.1.2 Digital Transformation (DT)
2.2 Implementation Challenges for System Development
2.3 Project involving Development of a Service
2.3.1 Business Management System (BMS)
2.3.2 Agile Development Process
2.3.3 Dynamic System Development Method (DSDM)
2.4 Design Science Research (DSR)
2.4.1 DSR Process models
2.4.2 The Knowledge Innovation Matrix (KIM)
2.4.3 DSR in the Digital Innovation (DSR-DI) model
2.4.4 DSR in Agile Methodologies
2.5 Summary

CHAPTER 3. RESEARCH FRAMEWORK AND HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT
3.1 DSR-DI for a Service Development Framework
3.2 Hypotheses Development
3.2.1 Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
3.2.2 Computer Self-Efficacy

CHAPTER 4. METHODOLOGY

CHAPTER 5. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
5.1 Background
5.2 Case Study
5.3 Phase 1: Definition Phase
5.4 Phase 2: Design of the Digital Innovation Phase
5.5 Phase 3: Demonstration
5.6 Phase 4: Design and Evaluation Phase
5.7 Phase 5: Analysis, Learning and Planning Phase
5.8 Discussion

CHAPTER 6. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
6.1 Contribution
6.2 Limitations
6.3 Suggestions
6.4 Conclusion

APPENDIX
REFERENCES

1.Abrahamsson, P., Salo, O., Ronkainen, J., & Warsta, J. (2002). Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis. Proc. Espoo 2002, 3-107.
2.Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Stair, R. (2000). Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy—An Empirical Assessment. Information Systems Research, 11, 418-430. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.418.11876
3.Alsaqqa, S., Sawalha, S., & Abdel-Nabi, H. (2020). Agile Software Development: Methodologies and Trends. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i11.13269
4.Anwer, F., Aftab, S., Waheed, U., & Muhammad, S. (2017). Agile Software Development Models TDD, FDD, DSDM, and Crystal Methods: A Survey. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 8, 1-10.
5.Babu, A. J. G., & Suresh, N. (1996). Project management with time, cost, and quality considerations. European Journal of Operational Research, 88(2), 320-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00202-9
6.Baijens, J., Helms, R., & Iren, D. (2020). Applying Scrum in Data Science Projects 2020 IEEE 22nd Conference on Business Informatics (CBI),
7.Bekkhus, R. (2016). Do KPIs used by CIOs Decelerate Digital Business Transformation? The Case of ITIL. Proceedings of the Twenty-First DIGIT Workshop, Dublin, Ireland.
8.Berger, W. (2012). The Secret Phrase Top Innovators Use Retrieved 6 from https://hbr.org/2012/09/the-secret-phrase-top-innovato
9.Blanka, C., Krumay, B., & Rueckel, D. (2022). The interplay of digital transformation and employee competency: A design science approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121575
10.Bloomberg, J. (2018). Digitization, digitalization, and digital transformation: confuse them at your peril. Forbes. Retrieved on August, 28, 2019.
11.Bonitasoft. (2009). Bonitasoft : Open Source BPM software - Business Process Management. Retrieved 06/28 from https://www.bonitasoft.com/
12.Boog, J. (2019). What Is DSDM (Dynamic Systems Development Method)? https://theqalead.com/development-devops-agile/dsdm-dynamic-systems-development-method/
13.Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211. https://doi.org/10.2307/249688
14.Conboy, K., Gleasure, R., & Cullina, E. (2015). Agile Design Science Research. In New Horizons in Design Science: Broadening the Research Agenda (pp. 168-180). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_11
15.Craddock, A., Roberts, B., Martlang, D., Tudor, D., Stapleton, J., Godwin, J., Richards, K., Buchan, M., & Messenger, S. (2014). The DSDM Agile Project Framework. Agile Business Consortium.
16.Czachorowski, K. V., Haskins, C., & Mansouri, M. (2023). Minding the gap between the front and back offices: A systemic analysis of the offshore oil and gas upstream supply chain for framing digital transformation. Systems Engineering, 26(3), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21652
17.D'Anna, D. (2021). 完全自學! Go語言(Golang)實戰聖經 (初版 ed.). 旗標發行.
18.Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475-487. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022
19.Erickson, J., Lyytinen, K., & Siau, K. (2005). Agile Modeling, Agile Software Development, and Extreme Programming: The State of Research. Journal of Database Management (JDM), 16(4), 88-100. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdm.2005100105
20.Firk, S., Hanelt, A., Oehmichen, J., & Wolff, M. (2021). Chief Digital Officers: An Analysis of the Presence of a Centralized Digital Transformation Role. Journal of Management Studies, 58(7), 1800-1831. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12718
21.Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., & Welch, M. (2014). Embracing Digital Technology: A New Strategic Imperative (15329194). (MIT Sloan Management Review, Issue.
22.Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
23.Gill, T. G., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). A Fitness-Utility Model for Design Science Research. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 4(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2499962.2499963
24.Gong, C., & Ribiere, V. (2021). Developing a unified definition of digital transformation. Technovation, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102217
25.González, J. L., & Ferencz, J. (2018). Digital Trade and Market Openness. https://doi.org/10.1787/1bd89c9a-en
26.Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2014). The Knowledge Innovation Matrix (KIM): A Clarifying Lens for Innovation. International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 17, 217-239. https://doi.org/10.28945/2046
27.He, B., & Geng, C. (2022). Development of Construction Workers Information Management System. Frontiers in Science and Engineering, 2(12), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.54691/fse.v2i12.3281
28.Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., & Wiesbock, F. (2016). Options for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy. Mis Quarterly Executive, 15(2), 123-139. ://WOS:000377109100003
29.Hevner, A., & Gregor, S. (2022). Envisioning entrepreneurship and digital innovation through a design science research lens: A matrix approach. Information & Management, 59(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103350
30.Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
31.Hill, T., Smith, N. D., & Mann, M. F. (1987). Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(2), 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.2.307
32.Hsia, J.-W., Chang, C.-C., & Tseng, A.-H. (2012). Effects of individuals' locus of control and computer self-efficacy on their e-learning acceptance in high-tech companies. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(1), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2012.702284
33.Huang, F., Teo, T., & Scherer, R. (2020). Investigating the antecedents of university students’ perceived ease of using the Internet for learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(6), 1060-1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1710540
34.Iansiti, M. (1998). Technology integration : making critical choices in a dynamic world. Harvard Business School Press.
35.International Data Corporation, I. (2022). Worldwide Digital Transformation Spending Guide (IDC Spending Guide Sees Worldwide Digital Transformation Investments Reaching $3.4 Trillion in 2026, Issue. https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=IDC_P32575
36.Jammalamadaka, K., & Krishna, V. R. (2013). Agile Software Development and Challenges. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2(8), 125-129.
37.Kayanda, A., Busagala, L., Oyelere, S., & Tedre, M. (2022). The use of Design Science and Agile Methodologies for improved information systems in the T anzanian Higher Education context. THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 89. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12241
38.Kim, S. S., & Malhotra, N. K. (2005). A Longitudinal Model of Continued IS Use: An Integrative View of Four Mechanisms Underlying Postadoption Phenomena. Management Science, 51(5), 741-755. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0326
39.Kornienko, G., Chabanenko, M., & Leheza, Y. (2018). Assessment of the Economic Efficiency of It Application at Enterprises. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(3), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-3-123-132
40.Lapao, L. V., Peyroteo, M., Maia, M., Seixas, J., Gregorio, J., Mira da Silva, M., Heleno, B., & Correia, J. C. (2021). Implementation of Digital Monitoring Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic for Patients With Chronic Diseases: Design Science Approach. J Med Internet Res, 23(8), e24181. https://doi.org/10.2196/24181
41.Lee, Y., Kozar, K., & Larsen, K. (2003). The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(50), 752-780. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01250
42.Legner, C., Eymann, T., Hess, T., Matt, C., Böhmann, T., Drews, P., Mädche, A., Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2017). Digitalization: Opportunity and Challenge for the Business and Information Systems Engineering Community. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(4), 301-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0484-2
43.Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
44.Liang, H., Wang, N., & Xue, Y. (2022). Juggling Information Technology (IT) Exploration and Exploitation: A Proportional Balance View of IT Ambidexterity. Information Systems Research, 33(4), 1386-1402. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1105
45.Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22 140, 55-55.
46.March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
47.Martins, J. (2022). If you like maximizing team impact, you’ll love resource allocation. ASANA. Retrieved 06/21 from https://asana.com/zh-tw/resources/resource-allocation
48.McAfee, A. (2009). Enterprise 2.0: New Collaborative Tools for Your Organization's Toughest Challenges. Harvard Business Review Press.
49.Mei, B., Brown, G. T. L., & Teo, T. (2017). Toward an Understanding of Preservice English as a Foreign Language Teachers’ Acceptance of Computer-Assisted Language Learning 2.0 in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(1), 74-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117700144
50.Meltzer, J. P. (2018). The impact of artificial intelligence on international trade A Blueprint for the Future of AI: 2018-2019. Retrieved 2023/5/28, from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-impact-of-artificial-intelligence-on-international-trade/
51.Mountney, S. L., Gao, J. X., & Wiseall, S. (2007). A knowledge system to support manufacturing knowledge during preliminary design. International Journal of Production Research, 45(7), 1521-1537. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600942300
52.Narayanaswamy, R., Grover, V., & Henry, R. M. (2014). The Impact of Influence Tactics in Information System Development Projects: A Control-Loss Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(1), 191-226. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222300106
53.Nunamaker, J. F., Chen, M., & Purdin, T. D. M. (1990). Systems Development in Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(3), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1990.11517898
54.Pagano, P., Antonelli, S., & Tardo, A. (2022). C-Ports: A proposal for a comprehensive standardization and implementation plan of digital services offered by the “Port of the Future”. Computers in Industry, 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103556
55.Park, Y., & Kim, D. (2021). Real-time service integration of defense information system: defense REST API server reference model design analysis. Journal of Advances in Military Studies, 4(3), 153-176. https://doi.org/10.37944/jams.v4i3.116
56.Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45-77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
57.Popadiuk, S., & Choo, C. W. (2006). Innovation and knowledge creation: How are these concepts related? International Journal of Information Management, 26(4), 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.03.011
58.Pressman, R. (2009). Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
59.Priyono, A., Moin, A., & Putri, V. N. A. O. (2020). Identifying Digital Transformation Paths in the Business Model of SMEs during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040104
60.Raza, Z., Woxenius, J., Vural, C. A., & Lind, M. (2023). Digital transformation of maritime logistics: Exploring trends in the liner shipping segment. Computers in Industry, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103811
61.Reznikova, N., Shlapak, A., & Ivashchenko, O. (2023). From Industrial Ecosystems To Digital Economy Ecosystems: New Business Models And Models Of Competition In The Conditions Of Digitalization Of International Trade In Goods And Services. Economic sciences, 316(2), 332-340. https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2023-316-2-52
62.Rothwell, R., & Gardiner, P. (1985). Invention, innovation, re-innovation and the role of the user: A case study of British hovercraft development. Technovation, 3(3), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(85)90012-4
63.Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action Design Research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488
64.Shamsutdinov, E. V., Torkunova, J. V., Habrieva, M. N., Plotnikova, L. V., Vankov, Y. V., & Sergeev, V. V. (2020). Current issues of information technologies application in electric power industry. E3S Web of Conferences, 124. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912405049
65.Stapleton, J. (1997). Dsdm: The Method in Practice. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
66.Takeda, H., Veerkamp, P., & Yoshikawa, H. (1990). Modeling Design Process. AI Magazine, 11(4), 37. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v11i4.855
67.Tesch, A., McAndrew, D., Rowan, D., Noël, J.-M., Wittemans, F., & Hagener, D. (2021). 從危機到轉機：貿易的未來是什麼？數位化對貿易的影響. https://group.atradius.com/publications/
68.Teubner, R. A. (2022). IT program management challenges: insights from programs that ran into difficulties. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 6(2), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm060204
69.Thorndike, R. M. (1995). Book Review : Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.) by Jum Nunnally and Ira Bernstein New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994, xxiv + 752 pp. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(3), 303-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169501900308
70.Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010). Research Commentary—Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748-759. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0318
71.Vaishnavi, V. K., & Kuechler, W. (2015). Design Science Research Methods and Patterns CRC Press.
72.Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation : a review and a research agenda [Aufsatz in Zeitschrift, Article in journal]. The journal of strategic information systems : incorporating International Information Systems, 28(2, (6)), 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
73.Vijayasri, G. V. (2013). The Importance of International Trade in the World. International Journal of Marketing, 2(9), 111-119.
74.Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital : turning technology into business transformation. http://www.worldcat.org/search?qt=worldcat_org_all&q=9781625272478
75.Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research Commentary—The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724-735. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0322
76.李淑茹. (2012). 圖解國貿實務(修訂二版) (二版. ed.). 五南.
77.林允溥. (2011). AWS雲端企業實戰聖經 : Amazon Web Services改造企業IT體質 (初版. ed.). 電腦人文化出版.
78.陳瑞, 黃銘偉, & Cherny, B. (2020). TypeScript程式設計 (初版 ed.). 碁峰資訊.
79.蕭文龍. (2018). 統計分析入門與應用 : SPSS中文版+SmartPLS 3(PLS-SEM) (第二版 ed.). 碁峰出版.