跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.44) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/01/02 11:05
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:楊雅惠
研究生(外文):Ya-Hui Yang
論文名稱:中外籍英語教師在教學行為與信念上的差異
論文名稱(外文):Differences in the Teaching Behaviors and Beliefs Between Local and Foreign English Teachers
指導教授:陳美貞陳美貞引用關係
指導教授(外文):Mei-Chen Chen
口試委員:陳美貞
口試日期:2013-07-02
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立屏東商業技術學院
系所名稱:應用英語系(所)
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
語文別:英文
論文頁數:75
中文關鍵詞:教學行為與信念外籍英語教師本籍英語教師國籍
外文關鍵詞:nationalityteaching behaviors and beliefsnative English speaking teachers (NEST)nonnative English speaking teachers (NNEST)
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:968
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:136
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
摘要
先前研究指出,國籍與民族教育理念對教師的教學行為與信念可能有很大的影響。不幸的是,台灣至今對中、外籍教師教學行為上的不同仍少有深入研究,尤其在英語教學環境上;涉及深度訪談的研究更甚稀少。此研究主要探討在大學英語口說課程中,中、外籍英語教師在教學行為和理念上的不同;學生對中、外籍教師教學上的理解程度、優缺點、喜好;中、外籍教師的教學期望差異、評估方式差異、及教學時面臨的困難差異。本研究採用量化和質化的方式進行:兩百一十一位台灣大學生的問卷調查,十位外籍與十位本籍英語教師,及二十位學生的個別深度訪談。此研究結果發現:(一) 大學生認為外籍與本籍教師在英語教學行為上是有明顯的不同 。透過相依樣本測試發現在學生問卷調查中,教學行為項目 (43項中有31項)的回答有著百分之七十二的顯著差異;(二) 外籍教師提供多樣化的課堂活動、上課中以學生口語練習為主、教學方法活潑多變、課堂中常與學生互動、設計活潑有趣的學習情境、上課會運用多媒體輔助學習;(三) 本籍教師安排較多的測驗、注重文法學習、每堂課有一定的課程進度。上課以老師講解及教科書為主,且能提供能增進口語能力的方法;(四) 多數學生 (83%)喜歡外籍教師的口語課程,因為可以提升學生的學習動機及增加與外國人說話的機會。多數大學生認為,曾在英語系國家讀書或居住過的本籍英文教師即有資格教授英語課程 ; (五) 所有訪談過的大學生都較偏好中外師協同教學;(六) 在外籍教師課堂中,不僅學生有課程理解上的困難,外師與學生也會發生溝通障礙、較少糾正學生口語錯誤,協助學生取得英語證照方面的成效也不大;(七) 外籍教師們高度期許學生能自信與流利地說英語,並喜歡學習英語;本籍教師則期望學生在英語口說中準確使用語法和字彙;(八) 外籍教師透過團隊合作,戲劇表演,或是運用多元評量來評估學生的英文口說能力;相反地,大多數本籍教師較偏向以個人表現為主的評分方式;(九) 此研究發現外籍與本籍英語教師在教學過程上,面臨的困難也有所不同。最後,我們將根據研究結果提出教學建議、未來研究導向,以茲參考。
Abstract
Previous research has shown that nationality and the educational philosophy in that culture may have great impact on a teacher’s teaching behaviors and beliefs. To date, not much literature has been documented in probing how foreign and local Mandarin-speaking English teachers differ in their teaching practices, in particular, in the EFL context of Taiwan. The research with in-depth interviews on these teachers has unfortunately been scant. The purpose of the study was to explore the teaching behaviors and beliefs of foreign and local English teachers at college oral training classes. Specifically, the student perceptions of the instructions of foreign and local English teachers, strengths and weaknesses of those teachers’teaching behaviors, student preferences for teachers in teaching such oral classes, and differences in the teaching expectations, assessments and difficulties for the two types of teachers were examined. It involved quantitative and qualitative methods: a questionnaire for 211 EFL college learners and in-depth individual interviews for both teachers (10 foreign English teachers and 10 Mandarin-speaking English teachers) and students (20 questionnaire takers). The important results were: (1) college students perceived great differences in the teaching behaviors of foreign and local English teachers; 72 % teaching behavior items (31 in 43) in the student questionnaires were found significant with the paired samples t-tests; (2) the most distinctive differences were found in providing various in-class activities, giving student-centered instruction, using various teaching approaches, often interacting with students, creating learning contexts and using multimedia, all of which in favor of the foreign English teachers; (3) giving more tests, focusing on teaching grammar, having fixed teaching progress, giving teacher-centered instruction, spending most time lecturing textbooks, and teaching learning strategies to improve students’oral skills characterized the perceived teaching behaviors of the local English teachers; (4) most of the participants (83%) reported their preferences for a foreign English teacher to teach an oral class chiefly due to the motivating instruction and opportunity to speak English with a foreign teacher; a local English teacher was considered as well in teaching English if he/she had lived or studied in the country where the English language was spoken; (5) when choices were given, all of the interviewed students would prefer to attend a class of mixed foreign and local English teacher teaching arrangement; (6) students’ having difficulty comprehending the lecture, the instructor’s having communication gap with students, seldom correcting student mistakes, and not helping students much on gaining English certificates were common problems reported by the interviewees in their experiences with a foreign English teacher’s class; (7) the interviewed foreign English teachers reported high student expectations in speaking English with confidence and fluency and meanwhile, being able to enjoy learning English; in contrast, the local English teachers expected their students to use grammar and vocabulary with precision and accuracy while delivering spoken English; (8) the foreign English teachers reported their preferences to evaluate student performance through teamwork, role-play, or with other alternative assessments; in contrast, most of the local English teachers preferred evaluating individual performances to group performances; (9) differences were also found in the teaching difficulties reported by the foreign and the local English teachers. Pedagogical implications and suggestions for further research were given to conclude this study.
Table of Contents
Abstract (Chinese)………………………………………………………………………… i
Abstract (English)………………………………………………………………………iii
Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………vi
Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………vii
Tables………………………………………………………………………………………x
CHAPTER 1………………………………………………………………………………1
Introduction……………………………………………………………………………1
Problem Statement ……………………………………………………………4
Purpose of the Study…………………………………………………………5
Research Questions………………………………5
Definitions of Terms……………………………………………………6
CHAPTER 2………………………………………………………………………………8
Literature Review……………………………………………………………………8
Cultural Backgrounds and Teaching Beliefs……………………………………8
Previous Research on Teachers of Different Nationalities and Their Different Teaching Behaviors……………………………………………………………10
Strengths and Weaknesses of Foreign and Local English Teachers…………15
Teacher Expectations and Teaching Difficulties………………………………17
CHAPTER 3………………………………………………………………20
Methodology…………………………………………………………20
Subjects…………………………………………………………20
Instruments…………………………………………………………………21
Procedures……………………………………………………………………24
Data Analyses………………………………………………………26

CHAPTER 4………………………………………………………………………………27
Results………………………………………………………………………………27
Validity and Reliability………………………………………………………….27
Results………………………………………………27
CHAPTER 5……………………………………………………………………………41
Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………41
Discussion on Major Findings…………………………………………………41
Teaching Behaviors of Foreign and Local English Teachers…………………41
Preferences for Foreign/Local English Teachers and Their Respective Strengths and Weaknesses……………………………………………………………44
Teacher Expectations and Teaching Difficulties………………………………46
Teacher Expectations……………………………………………………46
Teaching Difficulties……………………………………………………47
Pedagogical Implications…………………………………………48
Suggestions for Further Research……………………………………………49
References………………………………………………………………………………51
Appendix A: Questionnaire (English Version)…………………………………………….60
Appendix B: Questionnaire (Chinese Version)……………………………………………66
Appendix C: Interview Questions for Students (English Version)………………………72
Appendix D: Interview Questions for Students (Chinese Version)………………………73
Appendix E: Interview Questions for Teachers (English Version)……………………74
Appendix F: Interview Questions for Teachers (Chinese Version)……………………75
References
An, Y. J., & Reigeluth, C. (2012). Creating technology-enhanced, learner-centered classrooms: K–12 teachers’ beliefs, perceptions, barriers, and support needs. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(2), 54-59.
Arva, V., & Medgyes, P. (2000). Native and nonnative teachers in the classroom. System 28, 355-372.
Bayyurt, Y. (2006). Non-native English language teachers’ perspective on culture in English as a foreign language classrooms. Teacher Development, 10(2), 233-247.
Beaumont, M., & Chang, K.S. (2011). Challenging the traditional/communicative dichotomy. ELT Journal, 65(3), 291-299.
Benke, E., & Medgyes, P. (2005). The differences in teaching behaviors between native and nonnative speaker teachers: as seen by the learners. In E.Llurda (Ed.), Non-native language teacher (pp. 195-215). NY: Springer.
Braine, J. (2005). A history of research on non-native speaker English teachers.In E.Llurda (Ed.), Non-native language teacher (pp. 13-23). NY: Springer.
Butler, Y. G. (2007). How are nonnative English speaking teachers perceived by young learners? TESOL Quarterly, 41(4), 731-755.
Carless, D. (2006). Collaborative EFL teaching in primary schools. ELT Journal, 60 (4), 328-335.
Chen, C. W., & Cheng, Y. S. (2010). A case study on foreign English teachers’ challenges in Taiwanese elementary schools. System, 38, 41–49.
Devrim, D.Y. & Bayyurt, Y. (2010). Student’s understandings and preferences of the role and place of culture in English language teaching: A focus in an EFL context. TESOL Quarterly, 2, 4-23.
Dornyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom, The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273-284.
Ellis, R. (2007). Educational settings and second language learning. Asian EFL Journal, 9(4), 11-23.
Galloway, N. (2008). Native speaking English teachers in Japan: From the perspective of an insider. Journal of English as an International Language, 3, 27-188.
Grubbs, J. S., Jantarach, V., & Kettem, S. (2010). Studying English with Thai and native-speaking teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 16(5), 559-576.
Hayes, D. (2009). Non-native English-speaking teachers, context and English language teaching. System, 37(1), 1-11.
Han, S.A. (2005). Good teachers know where to scratch when learners feel itchy: Korean learners’ views of native-speaking teachers of English. Australian Journal of Education, 49(2), 197-213.
Hassan, A., Abiddin, N.A., & Anuar, N. (2011). Viewing the philosophy of education from the perspectives of different schools of thought. International review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 55-64.
Harumi, S. (2011). Classroom silence: voices from Japanese EFL learners. ELT Journal, 65(3), 260-269.
Hertel, J. T., & Sunderman, G. (2009). Student attitudes toward native and non-native language instructors. Foreign Language Annals, 42(3), 468-481.
Huang, Y. P. (2004). Language use of beginning students in a Taiwanese English immersion preschool. Tamkang Studies of Foreign Languages and Literatures, 3, 41-67.
Hue, M. T. (2007). The influence of classic Chinese philosophy of Confucianism, Taoism and Legalism on classroom discipline in Hong Kong junior secondary schools. Pastoral Care in Education, 25, 38-45.
Jang, S. H., Nguyen, B. H., & Yang, Y. (2010). Enhancing pedagogical roles of ESL/EFL native and non-native teachers through team teaching: how to make this “international partnership” successful. International Journal of Learning, 17(9), 249-258.
Kai, J. (2012). The origin and consequences of excess competition in Education. Chinese Education and Society, 45(2), 8-20.
Kasai, M., Lee, J. A., & Kim, S. (2011). Secondary EFL students’ perceptions of native and nonnative English-speaking teachers in Japan and Korea. Asian EFL Journal, 13(3), 272-300.
Kim, Y. H. (2009). An investigation into native and non-native teachers’ judgments of
oral English performance: A mixed methods approach. Language Testing, 26(2),
187–217.
Kim, K.H. (2005). Learning from each other: creativity in East Asian and American education, Creativity Research Journal, 17(4), 337-347.
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, M. J. (2005). What do students think about the pros and cons of having a native speaker teacher? In E.Llurda (Ed.), Non-native language teacher (pp. 217-241). NY: Springer.
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra J. M. (2002). University students‘ perceptions of native and non-native speaker teachers of English. Language Awareness, 11(2), 132-142.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language Teaching. (2th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Lee, H. K. (2009). Native and nonnative rater behavior in grading Korean students’ English essays. Asian Pacific Education, 10, 387-397.
Li, J. (2010). Learning to Self-Perfect: Chinese Beliefs about Learning. In C. K. Carol., & R. Nirmala (Eds.), Revisiting The Chinese Learner: Changing contexts, changing Education.(pp. 35-69). NY: Springer.
Liang, X. H. (2011). An analysis of the nature of classroom activities: a comparative study of an immersion English class and a non-immersion English class in the mainland of China. Frontiers of Education in China, 6(2), 310-330.
Ling, C. H., & Braine, G. (2007). The attitudes of university students towards non-native speakers English teacher in Hong Kong. RELC Journal, 257-277
Liu, M. X., & Zang, L. M. (2007). Student perceptions of native and nonnative English teachers’ attitudes, teaching skills assessment and performance. Asian EFL Journal, 9, 157-163.
Liu, L. (2008). Co-teaching between native and non-native English teachers: an exploration of co-teaching models and strategies in the Chinese primary school context. Reflection on English Language Teaching, 7(2), 103-188.
Liu, S., & Meng, L. (2009). Perceptions of teachers, students and parents of the characteristics of good teachers: a cross-cultural comparison of China and the United States. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 313-328.
Llurda, E. (2005). Looking at the perceptions, challenges, and contribution or the importance of being a non-native teacher. In E.Llurda (Ed.), Non-native language teacher (pp. 1-9). NY: Springer.
Ma, L. P. (2012). Strengths and weaknesses of NESTs and NNESTs: Perceptions of NNESTs in Hong Kong. Linguistics and Education, 23, 1-15.
Mason, M. (2007). Critical thinking and learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(4), 339-349.
Mcneill, A. (2005). Non-native speaker teachers and awareness of lexical difficulty in pedagogical texts. In E.Llurda (Ed.), Non-native language teacher (pp. 107-128). NY: Springer.
Meadows, B., & Muramatsu, Y. (2007). Native speaker or non-native speaker teacher? : A report of student preferences in four different foreign language classrooms. Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching, 14, 95-109.
Moussu, L., & Llurda, E. (2008). Non-native English-speaking English language teachers: History and research. Language Teaching, 41(3), 315-348.
Moussu, L. (2010). Influence of teacher-contact time and other variables on ESL students’ attitudes towards native-and nonnative-English-speaking teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 44(4), 746-768.
Patil, N. Z. (2008). Rethinking of the objectives of teaching English in Asia. Asian EFL Journal, 10, 227-240.
Park, E. S. (2009). The Korean university students' preferences toward native English speaking teachers. Modern English Education, 10(3), 114-130.
Rugasken, K., & Harris, J. A. (2009). English Camp: A language immersion
program in Thailand. Learning Assistance Review, 14(2), 43-51.
Ryan, J., & Louie, K. (2007). False Dichotomy? ‘Western’ and
‘Confucian’ concepts of scholarship and learning. Educational Philosophy and
Theory, 39(4), 404-417.
Shi, L. (2001). Native- and nonnative-speaking EFL teachers' evaluation of Chinese students English writing. Language Testing, 18(3), 303-325.
Shin, J. S. (2008). Preparing non-native English-speaking ESL teachers. Teacher Development, 12(1), 57-65.
Shin, J. C. (2012). Higher education development in Korea: Western university ideas, Confucian tradition, and economic development. Higher Education, 64(1), 59-72.
Song, X., & Cheng, L. (2011). Investigating primary English immersion teachers in China: background, instructional contexts, professional development, and
perceptions. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 97-112.
Subtirelu, N. (2011). Juggling Identity and Authority: A Case Study of One Non-Native Instructor of English. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 15(3), 1-31.
Tajino, A., & Tajino, Y. (2000). Native or nonnative: What can they offer? EFL Journal, 54(1), 3-11.
Tang, C. (1997). The identity of the nonnative ESL teacher on the power and status of nonnative ESL teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 577-580.
Todd, R.W., & Pojanaounya, P. (2009). Implicit attitudes towards native and nonnative speaker teachers. System, 37, 23-33.
Ustunluoglu, E. (2007). University students’ perceptions of native and non-native teachers. Teachers, and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(1), 63-79.
Wang, P. L. (2012). Teaching and learning English verb tenses in a Taiwanese university. English Linguistics Research, 1(1), 18-34.
Wang, J. (2011). Culture Differences and English Teaching. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 223-230.
Wang, L. Y. (2012). Preparing NESTs and NNESTs for team teaching at the pre-service level. Studies in Literature and Language, 4(1), 32-37.
Wu, W. C., & Wu, P. H. (2008). Creating an authentic EFL learning environment to enhance student motivation to study English. Asian EFL Journal, 10, 211-221.
Wu, W. C. (2009). Criteria for establishing an authentic EFL learning environment in Taiwan. Asian EFL Journal, 11(3), 156-189.
Yang, Y., & Howard, N. (2007). A review of interest in the learning of English in the Chinese context. Asian EFL Journal, 10, 146-153.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top