跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.54) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/01/09 09:27
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:許志豪
研究生(外文):Chin-Hou HSU
論文名稱:初次公開發行公司蜜月期股價表現與其未來價格變動特性之研究
論文名稱(外文):Study on Price Performance of First-time Public Issued Share Company in Honeymoon Period and Characteristics of Its Future Price Changeslong-run performance.
指導教授:施光訓施光訓引用關係
指導教授(外文):Kuang-Hsun Shih
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中國文化大學
系所名稱:會計研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:91
中文關鍵詞:蜜月期現象初次公開發行長期報酬
外文關鍵詞:honeymoon periodIPOlong-run performance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:879
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:4
以往國內外相關研究均一致認為,初次公開發行市場存在上市初期蜜月期現象,以及後續長期價格低落的情形。蜜月期現象是指初次公開發行股票在甫上市時,產生一波短期超額報酬的行情。而初次公開發行股票上市後的長期報酬,則是呈現報酬不佳甚至負報酬的現象。其中,上市時蜜月期報酬越高者,其未來的長期價格績效低落的情形越明顯。關於蜜月期報酬以及長期績效低落雖然是世界各國證券市場一種普遍存在的現象,但是關於其最主要的原因卻是眾說紛紜,莫衷一是。
本研以盈餘管理、資訊不對稱、經理人投資決策等構面探討蜜月期現象成因及與後期長期股價報酬間的關係。盈餘管理的部分是以可裁量性應計項目為代理變數,資訊不對稱則是以上市櫃前董監事持股比例及已成立年數作為代表,投資決策則是用資本支出比率來判斷,並運用結構方程模式來驗證各項假說。
本研究以2001至2002年間初次公開發行公司為對象,實證結果發現:當公司上市櫃前有較高的董監事持股比例及資本支出率跟可裁量性應計項目時,會有不錯的蜜月期報酬。而上市前成立年數越高的公司,上市後蜜月期報酬雖然不顯著,但是長期持有報酬的跌幅卻是最小的。
Since before and till now, related researches, no matter domestic or foreign, have unanimously agreed that there is honeymoon period at the initial stage when a company issues shares to the public for the first time and the long-term consequent situation of low share price performance does exist. Honeymoon phenomenon occurs when the shares are just issued to the public market for the first time and has demonstrated a short-term wave of excessive rate of return. However, the long-term yield after the initial shares are sold in the stock market will show undesirable performance, and even negative rate of return will take place. Among the companies, if the rate of return is higher in the honeymoon period when the company starts trading in the stock exchange market, it is more apparent that the future price performance will be low. Although it is a commonly known situation that exists in every country’s stock exchange market in the world, opinions still vary and are unable to decide which one is right pertaining to the primary causes of such situation.

This research adopts three perspectives, namely control of earnings, information inconsistency, manager’s investment decisions, to explore the correlation between causes of honeymoon phenomenon and ensuing long-term rate of return on shares. Control of earnings uses discretionary accruals as substitute variable. Information inconsistency uses shareholders ratio of board of directors and supervisors and years of business as representation. Investment decisions are judged by capital expenditure ratio and utilize Structural Equation Modeling to test validity of each assumption.
This research uses the companies that were first traded on the public stock exchange market in the years of 2001 and 2002 as the objects of study. After testing and verifying, the following findings are resulted: When the shareholder ratio of board of directors and supervisors, capital expenditure, or discretionary accruals is higher prior to be listed on the stock market, the rate of return during honeymoon period will be enticing. Even though the companies with more years of business operation prior to listing in the stock market do not exhibit noticeable rate of return during honeymoon period, however, the tumble on rate of return for the long run is very minimal.
內容目錄
中文摘要 ........................ iii
英文摘要 ........................ iv
誌謝辭  ........................ Vi
內容目錄 ....................... vii
表目錄  ....................... ix
圖目錄  ....................... x
公式目錄 ....................... xi
第一章  緒論..................... 1
  第一節  研究背景................. 1
  第二節  研究動機................. 3
  第三節  研究目的與問題.............. 5
  第四節  研究流程與論文架構............ 5
第二章  文獻探討................... 8
  第一節  新發行股票蜜月期的定義.......... 8
  第二節  影響發行股票蜜月期績效報酬之因素..... 9
  第三節  新發行股票的長期報酬........... 20
  第四節  資本支出與未來價格報酬的關係....... 31
第三章  研究方法................... 34
  第一節  研究範圍及架構.............. 34
  第二節  研究假說................. 36
  第三節  研究變數之操作型定義........... 40
  第四節  研究設計................. 45
第四章  實證結果與分析................ 54
  第一節  敘述性統計分析結果............ 55
  第二節  相關分析................. 57
  第三節  結構方程模式............... 60
第五章  結論與建議.................. 75
  第一節  研究結論................. 75
  第二節  研究建議................. 81
  第三節  研究限制................. 81
參考文獻........................ 82
一、中文部分
王昱欣(2002),新上市盈餘管理與異常報酬之關連性研究,輔仁大學管理研究所碩士論文。
朱立倫(1997),台灣股市新上市股票蜜月現象之研究,證券市場發展季刊,9(1),1-28。
林清山 (2003),結構方程模式(SEM) : 基本原理及其在心理與教育研究之應用,臺北市 : 師大書苑。
李建然,陳政芳,李啟華(2003),董監事持股集中度與會計師獨立性-對會計師出具繼續經營疑慮查核意見之影響,當代會計,4(2),191-210。
李茂能(2003),圖解式結構方程模式軟體AMOS之簡介與應用。國民教育研究學報,11,1-39。
邱皓政(2003),結構方成模式: LISREL的理論、技術與應用,台北市,雙葉。
金成隆,林修葳,洪郁珊(2003),會計評論,第36 期, 1 月,23-53 。
洪振虔,吳欽杉,陳安琳(2002),非理性投資行為對新上市股票價格績效之影響,管理評論,22(2),53-79。
洪振虔,吳欽杉,陳安琳(2003),新上市公司股票刻意偏低定價之影響因素-隨機前緣模式的運用,管理學報,20(1),113-141。
陳順宇(2000),迴歸分析(3版),台北:華泰書局。
黃芳銘(2000),結構方程模式:理論與應用,台北:五南。
黃芳銘(2004),社會科學方法學:結構方程模式,台北:五南。
楊琮琪(2001),國內新上櫃公司異常報酬之實證研究,朝陽科技大學財務金融系碩士班碩士論文。
闕河士,張功弦(1999),所有權結構與新上市公司上市後營業績效關係之實證,亞太經濟管理評論,2(2),49-64。
二、英文部分
Aggarwal, R., & Rivoli, P. (1990). Fads in the initial public offering market? Financial Management, 19(4), 45-57.
Aitken, M., Brown, P., Buckl, C., Izan, H. Y., & Walter, T. (1996). Price clustering on the Australian stock exchange. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 4(2), 297-314.
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for 'lemons': Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
Allen, F., & Faulhaber, G. (1989). Signalling by underpricing in the IPO market. Journal of Financial Economics, 23(2), 303-323.
Ambarish, R., Hauser, S., & Williams, J. (1987). Efficient signal with dividends and investments. Journal of Finance, 42(2), 321-342.
Barry, C., & Brown, S. (1985). Differential information and securiy market equilibrium. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , 20(4), 407-421.
Beatty, R. P., & Ritter, J. R. (1986). Investment banking reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. Journal of Fi-nancial Economics, 15(1), 213-232.
Benveniste, L. M., Busaba, W., & Wilhelm, W. J. (2002). Information externalities and the role of underwriters in primary equity markets. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 11(1), 61-86.
Boomsma, A., & Hoogland, J. J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL revisited. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Struc-tural equation models: Present and future. A festschrift in honor of Karl G. Jöreskog, (pp. 139-164), Chicago: Scientific Soft-ware International.
Booth, J. R., & Chua, L. (1996). Ownership dispersion, costly infor-mation, and IPO underpricing. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(2), 291-310.
Brav, A., & Gompers, P. A. (1997). Myth or reality? The long-run underperformance of initial public offerings: Evidence from venture and non-venture capital-backed companies. Journal of Finance, 52(5), 1791-1821.
Brennan, M. J., & Franks, J. (1997). Underpricing, ownership and control in initial public offerings of equity securities in the UK, Journal of Financial Economics, 45(3), 391-413.
Brown, P., Chua, A., & Mitchell, J. (2002). The influence of cultural factors on price clustering: Evidence from Asia-Pacific stock markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 10(3), 307-332.
Carter, R. B., & Manaster, S. (1990). Initial public offerings and un-derwriter reputation. Journal of Finance, 45(4), 1045-1067.
Carter, R. B., Dark, F. H., & Singh, A. K. (1998). Underwriter reputa-tion, initial returns, and the long-run performance of IPO stocks. Journal of Finance, 53(1), 285-312.
Clark, D. T. (2002). A study of the relationship between firm age at-IPO and aftermarket stock performance. Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, 11(4), 385-108.
Chang, K. P., & Tang, Y. M. (2003). Pricing Taiwan's initial public offerings. Paper presented at the European financial manage-ment association 2003 Helsinki meetings, Finland, Helsinki.
Chiang, K., & Harikumar, T. (2002). Information production and IPO offering price clusters: Further evidence explaining underpric-ing and long-run underperformance. Unpublished manuscript, University of Fairbanks at Alaska.
Cheng, W. Y., Cheung, Y. L., & Po, K. K. (2004). A note on the in-traday patterns of initial public offerings: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 31(5), 837-860.
Chung, K., Wright, P., & Charoenwong, C. (1998). Investment op-poutunities and market reaction to capital expenditure decisions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22(1), 41-60.
Durukan, M. B. (2002). The relationship between IPO returns and factors influencing IPO performance: Case of the Istanbul stock exchange. Managerial Finance, 28(2), 18-38.
Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155-1177.
Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeny, A. P. (1995). Detecting earn-ings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193-225.
Douglas, A., Ronald, C., & Thomas, M. (1997). The survival of initial public offerings in the aftermarket. Journal of Financial Re-search, 20(1), 93-110.
Griner, H., & Gordon, L. (1995). Internal cash flow, insider ownership and capital expenditures: A test of the pecking order and mana-gerial hypotheses. Journal of Business, Finance, and Account-ing, 22(2), 179-199.
Goergen, M. (1998). Insider retention and long-run performance in German and UK IPOs. Unpublished manuscript, University of UMIST at UK.
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Jr., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multi-variate data analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Helwege, J., & Liang, N. (2004). Initial public offerings in hot and cold markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39(3), 541-569.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (Eds.). (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications, (pp.76-99). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Ibbotson, R. G., & Jaffe, J. F. (1975). Hot issue markets. The Journal of Finance, 30(4), 1027-1042.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Mana-gerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Jones, J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investiga-tions. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193-228.
Jensen, M., & Ruback, R. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1), 5-50.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Leland, H., & Pyle, D. (1977). Informational asymmetries, financial structure and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance, 32(2), 371-387.
Levis, M. (1993). The long-run performance of Initial public offerings: The UK experience 1980-1988. Financial Management, 22(1), 28-41.
Logue, D. E. (1973). On the pricing of unseasoned equity issues: 1965-1969. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 8(1), 91-103.
Loughran, T., & Ritter, J. R. (1995). The new issues puzzle. Journal of Finance, 50(1), 23-51.
Ljungqvist, A., & Wilhelm, W. J. (2003). IPO pricing in the dot-com bubble. The Journal of Finance, 56(2), 723-752.
McConnell, J., & Muscarella, C. (1985). Corporate capital expenditure decisions and the market value of the firm. Journal of financial Economics, 14(3), 399-422.
Mikkelson, W. H., Partch, M. M., & Shah, K. (1997). Ownership and operating performance of companies that go public. Journal of Financial Economics, 44(3), 281-307.
Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management own-ership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1), 293-315.
Muscarella, C., & Vetsuypens, M. R. (1998). A simple test of Baron's model of IPO underpricing. Journal of Financial Economics, 24(1), 125-135.
Myers, S., & Majluf, N. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-222.
Purnanandam, A. K., & Swaminathan, B. (2004). Are IPOs under-priced?. Review of Financial Studies, 17(3), 811-848.
Rahman, H., & Yung, K. (1999). Insurance IPOs-a test of the under-pricing theories. Journal of Insurance Issues, 22(1), 61-77.
Ritter, J. R. (1984). The "hot issue" market of 1980. Journal of Busi-ness, 57 (2), 215-240.
Ritter, J. R. (1991). The long-run performance of initial public offer-ings. Journal of Finance, 46(1), 3-27.
Rock, K. (1986). Why new issues are underpriced. Journal of Finan-cial Economics, 15(2), 187-212.
Shih, K. H., Lin, C. W., Huang, H. T., & Chiang, W. C. (in press). Market information feedback for the high-tech dominated IPO companies. International Journal of Technology Management.
Stoughton, N. M., & Zechner, J. (1998). IPO-mechanisms, monitoring and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(1), 45-77.
Stulz, R. M. (1988). Managerial control of voting rights, financial policies and the market for corporate control. Journal of Finan-cial Economics, 20(1), 25-54.
Subrahmanyam, A., & Titman, S. (1999). The going public decision and the development of financial markets. Journal of Finance, 54(3), 1045-1082.
Teoh, S. H., Welch, I., & Wong, T. J. (1998). Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 50(1), 63-99.
Tinic, S. (1988). Anatomy of initial public offerings of common stock. Journal of Finance, 43(4), 789-822.
VanBommel, J., & Vermaelen, T. (2003). Post-IPO capital expendi-tures and market feedback. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27(2), 275-305.
Welch, I. (1989). Seasoned offerings, imitation costs and the under-writing of the IPOs. Journal of Finance, 44(2), 421-449.
World Bank. (1999). Corporate governance: A framework for imple-mentation-overview. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top