臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究係以審視宏觀環境(macro environment)觀點，比較與分析亞洲主流航空公司中之兩翹楚－位於香港之國泰航空公司與位於新加坡之新加坡航空公司。在同一航空產業規範中，面對其內外部環境因素優劣態勢及公司先後天條件之不同情況下，此個案公司該如何「看看周遭；想想自己」，進而擬定各自之優勢競爭策略。而此所謂之「周遭」就是本研究所認為之「產業環境」，「宏觀環境」與「競爭對手」。所謂之「想想自己」乃是「自我審核」，即以自我SWOT分析為主，覓強補弱。宏觀環境之改變對企業能否如期順利的達到其預設之目標有著深遠的影響。而公司之策略更會隨著環境之不停變遷而隨時調整。是環境因素造就了成功的企業，抑或是企業改造了環境，還是二者相輔相成，此皆為本研究欲探討之範疇。
本研究採用個案研究分析方法，透過國內外之文獻探討，初級資料及次級資料之蒐集，訪談之比較，探討此兩強航空公司該如何因應宏觀環境所帶來之機會與命運、變化與發展。並經由對個案公司的產業環境、外部環境及內部環境的比較評估，找尋其可為公司掌握與運用公司之生存策略與差異定位、成功核心價值與優勢所在，進而制定出一套競爭策略，並藉此優勢競爭策略在亞太暨全球航空市場中持續保持其領先態勢。
經由本研究探討歸納分析，認為國泰航空的生存、成功及優勢競爭發展策略為:
壹.國泰航空公司得到了相當多的宏觀環境帶來的競爭優勢。
貳.國泰航空的生存策略是採取「保守觀望情勢，跟隨競爭者學習，迅速根據環境應變，開始超越競爭對手」的四部曲。
參.國泰航空的成功策略是採取「非常有效率的成本控管與second to none policy」的高度成功整合。
肆.國泰航空的目標與宗旨是「做為一個優質服務領先者，及全球最令人景仰尊崇的航空公司」。
伍.國泰航空的發展策略是「背靠中國、立足香港、胸懷亞太、放眼天下」

認為新加坡航空的生存、成功及優勢競爭發展策略為:
壹.新加坡航空公司認為「人」及「人所提供出來的服務」是新加坡航空致勝成功的關鍵，以「人及新航的核心能力」為成功策略之基礎。
貳.新加坡航空的成功策略是把原本認為會衝突的「低成本」與「差異化」高度成功整合採取。新航一直以來，刻意製造與強調其與其他競爭對手的服務差異。
參.新加坡航空的成功策略是採取「採行顧客導向為先，主動分析顧客需求，為顧客提供最精緻的服務，讓顧客對新航產生忠實感」。
肆.新加坡航空的目標與宗旨是「不要做為一個全球最大的航空公司，卻要做為全球航空業『服務標準的定義者』及『全球獲利率最好的航空公司』」
伍.新加坡航空的發展策略是「咽控六甲、繁榮獅城、定義服務、優質領先」

The strategies of corporate operations should always be adjusted which basing to the influences of the environment and terms. Thus, this research, based on a macro environment viewpoint, addresses a structurally analytical comparison between two leading Asian airlines-Cathay Pacific Airways based in Hong Kong and Singapore Airlines from the city-state of Singapore, it also proceeds on evaluation of the internal, industrial and external environment, which to propose the main factors of how the enterprise generates the competitive strategies. Subject to the same business climate, the two airlines have differently come up with their own SWOT strategies in order to survive and prosper from their respective ups and downs. How the two case study companies have managed to "look around" and "think aback" before determining their competitive strategies? "Look around" refers to " industrial environment", "macro environment" and "competitors". Cited in this research. "Look aback" means self-examination, in other words, it also means a self-SWOT. That aims for optimization. Based on the case-study-method, this research goes through relevant literatures from home and abroad, collecting both primary and advanced data. It focuses on how the two companies grasp and utilize their core values as well as superiority to map out their successful strategies that have made them an outstanding Asian Duo in the global red sea of airlines industries.
Along with doing case study analysis of Cathay pacific Airways and Singapore Airlines, the formation of competitive strategies for low cost airlines will be discussed as well, it will be better providing references for the industrial to make and revise their competitive strategies in airline industry. Thus, whether enterprises can achieve their goals successfully often influence on environmental changes. Under such a premise,the corporation mission should apply different strategy in different period of time.
This research concludes that Cathay Pacific Airways attributes its survival and success to the following:
1. CX gained many macro environment advantages that initiate
its competing edge.
2. CX''s four surviving steps are: looking around conservatively,hitting the beaten track, self-calibrating quickly, and prevailing steadily.
3. CX''s succeeding strategies arise from a significant synergy of its effective cost control as well as its policy of being "Second to None".
4. CX commits to becoming a global leading quality service provider and a worldwide respectable airlines.
5. CX''s developing strategies are: leaning on china, setting afoot in Hong Kong, an Asian player all but achieving its global wonder.
This research also concludes that Singapore Airlines attributes its survival and success to the following:
1. SQ sticks to its "human" and "humanized services," believing they are its core powers that have become the founding stone of its successful strategies.
2. SQ successfully overcame an impossible synergy between a lower cost and self-differentiation, which they had long believed to be mutual exclusive.
3. SQ''s succeeding strategies are: customer orientation, customer needs prioritizing, showing customers the most delicate ever provided services, and
gaining customers'' fundamental loyalty to SQ.
4. SQ commits to not becoming the world''s biggest airlines, instead it aspires to making its name synonymous to " a service goals setter" and "the most profitable airlines."
5. SQ''s developing strategies are: dominating the Strait of Malacca, enriching the lion city, defining services standards, and a prevailing quality initiative.

書名頁 ………………………………………………………………………… i
論文口試委員審定書 ………………………………………………………… ii
授權書 ………………………………………………………………………… iii
中文提要 ……………………………………………………………………… iv
英文提要 ……………………………………………………………………… vi
致謝 …………………………………………………………………………… viii
目錄 …………………………………………………………………………… x
表目錄 ………………………………………………………………………… xii
圖目錄 ………………………………………………………………………… xiv
第一章 緒論 …………………………………………………………………… 1
第一節 研究背景 …………………………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究動機 …………………………………………………………… 4
第三節 研究目的 …………………………………………………………… 5
第四節 研究範圍與限制 …………………………………………………… 5
第五節 研究方法 …………………………………………………………… 6
第六節 研究架構與流程 …………………………………………………… 8
第二章 文獻探討 ……………………………………………………………… 9
第一節 策略的定義 ………………………………………………………… 9
第二節 競爭力、國家競爭力、核心競爭力 ……………………………… 9
第三節 競爭優勢與價值鏈………………………………………………… 17
第四節 五力分析…………………………………………………………… 23
第五節 鑽石模型與宏觀環境PEST……………………………………… 25
第六節 內部分析─SWOT………………………………………………… 29
第三章 分析架構 ……………………………………………………………… 34
第一節 分析架構…………………………………………………………… 34
第二節 宏觀環境之影響談………………………………………………… 35
第三節 多層次競爭模式研究限制………………………………………… 36
第四章 航空產業競爭分析研究發現 ………………………………………… 38
第一節 航空產業之特性與五力分析……………………………………… 38
第二節 主流航空公司與低成本航空公司之差別與 SWOT分析 ……… 47
第三節 亞洲低價航空公司現況與分析宏觀環境之影響談……………… 52
第五章 國泰航空與新加坡航空所處環境與多層次競爭模式分析討論與結論 56
第一節 外部分析─雙方所處政府及總部基地所在地之比較：香港及新 加坡之宏觀環境PEST及其對航空產業之鑽石模型分析 ……… 56
第二節 所使用的機場比較：香港赤臘角機場與新加坡樟宜機場……… 75
第三節 兩研究對象本體之介紹與比較：國泰航空與新加坡航空……… 86
第六章 多層次競爭模式暨國泰與新航之定位與競爭優勢分析…………… 105
第一節 多層次競爭模式…………………………………………………… 105
第二節 國泰航空與新加坡航空之競爭地位的變數彙總………………… 116
第三節 國泰航空與新加坡航空制定競爭策略的流程…………………… 118
第四節 個案公司競爭優勢訪談摘要對照………………………………… 121
第七章 研究貢獻及對個案公司提出之結論與建議 ………………………… 124
第一節 國泰航空生存發展之成功策略…………………………………… 124
第二節 新加坡航空生存發展之成功策略………………………………… 125
第三節 對個案公司提出之結論與建議…………………………………… 126
參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………………… 131
附錄

1.丁錫鏞(1993)，二十一世紀航空產業戰略，台北：嵐德出版
2.王士峰(1999)，管理學。台北：文京圖書有限公司
3.中華民國經濟部官方網站，available from URL:
http://www.moea.gov.tw/
4.方至正、鍾憲瑞(2006)，策略管理 建立企業永續競爭力，台北：前程文化事業
5.世界經濟論壇官方網站 (WEF)，available from URL:
http://www.weforum.org/en/about/index.htm
6.交通部(2002)，「交通政策白皮書-運輸」，台北：交通部
7.方世杰(1995)，經濟學概論，台北：五南出版
8.司徒達賢(2001)，策略管理新論─觀念架構與分析方法，台北：智勝出版
9.宋軒麟(2003)，香港航空百年，香港：三聯書局
10.余朝權 (1994)，產業競爭分析專論，台北：五南圖書出版
11.周八駿 (1992)，香港經濟，香港 : 三聯書局
12.香港政府統計局官方網站，available from URL:
http://www.censtatd.gov.hk/home/index_tc.jsp
13.香港國際機場官方網站，available from URL:
http://www.hongkongairport.com/eng/index.html
14.柯新治(2003)，新加坡─南海之珠的經濟與社會動向，台北：天下文化
15.莊素玉、楊瑪利(1995)，高標挑戰新加坡，台北：天下文化
16.工研院經資中心網站，available from URL: http://www.iek.itri.org.tw/eng/index.htm
17.國泰航空公司官方網站，available from URL:
http：//www.cathapacific.com
18.許士軍(1995)，管理學，台北：東華書局
19.湯明哲(2003)，策略精論 基礎篇: 台北：天下文化
20.張國雄 (2005)，國際行銷學─建構全球行銷能力，台北：前程出版
21.新加坡航空公司官方網站，available from URL:
http：//www.singaporeair.com
22.新加坡政府經濟發展局官方網站，available from URL:
http://www.sedb.com/edb/sg/zh_cn/index.html
23.瑞士洛桑管理學院官方網站(IMD)，available from URL:
http://www.imd.ch/index.cfm?bhcp=1
24.樟宜機場官方網站，available from URL:
http://www.changi.airport.com.sg/
25.鄭得良(1993)，香港奇蹟─經濟成就的文化動力，台北：台灣商務印書館
26.謝淑貞((1999)，賽局理論，台北：三民書局
27.顧長永(2006)，新加坡蛻變的四十年，台北：五南圖書出版
28.饒美蛟、李思名、施岳群(2006)，區域經濟合作 CEPA與珠三角及長三角，香港：
商務印書館
29.劉志奇(2005)，「國際航空業與三大聯盟之競爭策略研究」，元智大學管理研究所碩士論文
30.饒餘慶(1997)，香港-國際金融中心，台北：台灣商務印書館
31.民航處年報 1998/1999，香港民航處香港國際機場
32.香港政府新聞處，香港便覽 與 航空知識精讀，共和媒體
33.蘇哲仁、林家五 (1999)，策略管理，台北:五南出版社
34.Robert S, Kaplan，陳正平(2004)譯，策略地圖，臉譜出版社
35.經濟部(2001)，「主要國家發展知識經濟與知識產業之政策研究」，台北：經濟部
36.Corrine Glesne，莊明貞(2006)譯，質性研究導論，台北：高等文化事業
37.Des Dearlove，林秀津(2005)譯，管理思想如何改變世界，台北：商周出版
38.Joseph E.Stiglitz，李明(2002)譯，全球化的許諾與失落，台北：大塊文化
39.Michael E. Porter，周旭華譯(1998)，競爭策略，台北：天下文化
40.Michael E. Porter，周旭華譯(1999)，競爭優勢(上)，台北：天下文化
41.Michael E. Porter，周旭華譯(1999)，競爭優勢(下)，台北：天下文化
42.Shoan L.Brown and Kathleen M.Elesnharat，孫麗珠、陳樹衡譯(2000)，邊緣競爭，
台北：商周出版
43.Steven Pan(2005)，「航空爭霸戰 波音 VS. 空中巴士」 台北， 維德出版公司。
周嘉川(2006)，獅城歲月， 台北：台灣商務印書館
44.William E. Rothschild，許是祥(1990)譯，企業經營競爭分析 如何增進競爭優勢，
台北：清華管理科學圖書
45.Andrew, K. (1971) , The Concept of Corporate Strategy, Illionis , Dow-Jones-Irwin.
46.Ansoff, H.1. (1965), Corporate Strategy, New York,: McGraw-Hill.
47.Arthur A. Thompson Jr., A.J. Strickland III and John E. Gamble(2007)，Crafting & Executing Strategy,15th,McGraw Hill Intl.N.Y.
48.Ackoff, R. (1981) . Creating the corporate future. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
49.Ajami, R.A. (2006) , The Global Enterprise, US:HaworthPress
50.Aguilar, F. (1967). Scanning the business environment . New York : Macmillan.
51.Barney, J. B (1986), "Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Substained
Competitive Advantage ? " Academy of Management Review, 11, 3, 656-665.
52.Bowen, John (2000), Airline Hubs in Southeast Asia : National Economic Development and Nodal Accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography, 8:25-41.
53.Bates, D., & Eldridge, D. (1984). Strategy and policy : analysis , formulation,
and implementation (2nd ed. ) . Dubuque, IA: Brown.
54.Buckley, P. J., Pass, C. L. and Prescott, K.,(1988) “Measures of International Competitiveness: A Critical Survey,” Journal of Marketing Management, Vol.4, No.2, pp.175-200
55.Campbell, A, and S. Young (1991), "Creating a Sense of Mission," Long Range Planning, 24, 4, 10-20 .
56.Chandler, A.D. (1962), Strategy and Structure, Chapters in the History of American Industrial Enterprise. Massachusetts: M. I. T. Press.
57.David FullBrook, available from URL: http://www.fullbrook.me.uk/
58.Diffenbach, J. ( 1983) . " Corporate environmental analysis in large U. S. corporations. "Long Range Planning , 16(3), 107-116.
59.Dill, W. (1958) . "Environment as an influence on managerial autonomy. "
Administrative Science Quarterly, 2(2) , 409- 443.
60.Dunning, J. H. (1992), “The Competitive Advantages of Countries and the Activities of Transnational Corporations,” Transnational Corporations, Vol. 1, pp. 135-168.
61.Fahey, L. (1989) . "Understanding the macro environment: A framework for analysis."In L. Fahey, (ed) , The Strategic Planning Management Reader, Englewood Cliffs, NJ , Prentice Hall , pp. 38-43.
62.Fahey, L., King, W., & Narayanan, V. ( 1981) . "Environment al scanning and forecasting in strategic planning-The state of the art." Lon g Range Planning,14(1),pp.32- 39.
63.George Stonehouse, David Campbell,Jim Hamill and Tony Purdie(2004),Global and Transnational Business – Strategy and Management,2nd,Wiley UK.
64.Ginter, P. M., and W. J Duncan (1990), "Macro environmental Analysis Strategic Management," Long Range Planning, 23, 6, 91-100.
65.Hall, R. (1992), “The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 135-144.
66.Hugh Courtney , Jane Kirkland and Patrick Viguerie (2007) , Managing Uncertainty , Harvard Business Review ,Mar,2007
67.IATA (International Air Transport Association)，available from URL:
http://www.iata.org/index.htm
68.ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization)，available from URL:http://www.icao.int/
69.Jarach David (2001), The Evolution of Airport Management Practices: Towards a Multi-Point, Multi-Service, Marketing-Driven Firm. Journal of Air Transport Management, 7: 119-125.
70.Keegan W. J. (1999), Global Marketing Management, New Jersey: Prentice Hall International.
71.Lin, 1. H. and S.H. Pao (2004) "Portfolio Approach and/ or Firm Approach? Remarks on the Future of Strategic Bank Management," Journal of Futures Studies, 9, 2,43-54.
72.Lenz. R. ,& Engledow , J. ( 1986) . "Environment al analysis : The applicability of current theory. " Strategic Management journal , 7, 329-346.
73.Michael J, Enright, Edith E.Scott and David Dodwell (1997), HongKong Advantage, UK: Oxford University Press.
74.Miller, A, and G.G. Dess (1996), Strategic Management, New York: McGraw-HilI.
75.Miller , D. ,& Friesen, P. (1977), " Strategy making in context : T en empirical
archetypes. " Journal of Management Studies , 14( 3), 253-280.
76.Porter, M.E.(1990).Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press, P127
77.Porter, M. E. ( 1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors , New York, New: Free Press Company
78.R. H. Waterman, Jr. (1982), "The Seven Elements of Strategic Fit," Journal of
Business Strategy.
79.Robinson (1982),Sales Promotion Management, Chicago: Crain Books
80.Robbins, S.P. and M Coulter (1999), Management, New Jersey: Prentice Hall
International.
81.Ryan airline available from URL: http:// www.ryanair.com
82.Stalk, G. (1988), “Time: the next source of competitive advantage,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 41-51.
83.Starbuck, W. ( 1976 ) . " Organizations and their environments. " In M. Dunn ette ( Ed. ), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology . Chicago : Rand McNally.
84.Stubbart, C. ( 1982) . " Are environmental scanning units effective?" Long Range Planning : 15(3 ), 139-145.
85.Schuler, R. S. P. J. Dowling, and D.C. Helen ( 1993 ), "An Integrative Frame Work of Strategic International Human Resource Management," Journal of Management,19, 2, 419-460 .
86.Waterman, R.H.T. J. Peters, and J.R. Phillips (1980), "Structure is Not Organization," Business Horizon, 23, 3, 14-26.
87.Wit, B. D. and R. Meyer ( 1994), Strategy, Process, Content, Context, An International Perspective, St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
88.Wilson. I. (1982) . " Environmental scanning and strategic planning. In G. Steiner etal. (Eds.) Management Policy and Strategy ( Reading 7). New York: Macmillan.
89.WEF available from URL: http://www.weforum.org/en/about/index.htm