跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.54) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/01/13 00:37
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:李子倫
研究生(外文):Tz-Lun Li
論文名稱:颱風時期水庫操作風險分析之研究-以石門水庫為例
論文名稱(外文):Risk Analysis of Reservoir Operation during Typhoon Period - A Case Study of the Shih-Men Reservoir
指導教授:張斐章張斐章引用關係
指導教授(外文):Fi-John Chang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:農業工程學研究所
學門:工程學門
學類:其他工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:1999
畢業學年度:87
語文別:中文
論文頁數:92
中文關鍵詞:洪水溢流模糊失誤樹分析防洪操作延遲一階可靠度分析法均值一階二級動差法蒙地卡羅模擬法
外文關鍵詞:flood overflowfuzzy fault-tree analysisflood defense operation delayFirst Order Reliability Analysis MethodMean-Value First Order Second Moment MethodMonte Carlo Simulation Method
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:353
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
水庫之安全,除了影響本身之功能及經濟利益外,同時關係到下游地區人民生命財產之安全,故確保水庫壩體安全極為重要。台灣地區土石壩的使用相當普遍,經由統計顯示,土石壩潰決之原因中,洪水溢頂佔了相當高之比例,其餘則多為地工因素所造成,因此,本文將針對颱風時期水庫洪水溢流問題進行風險探討。
本研究以石門水庫為研究對象,首先利用模糊失誤樹分析,針對水庫溢流問題,進行定性分析。接著選擇失誤樹架構中關於人為操作因子之操作延遲項目,利用一階可靠度分析法、均值一階二級動差法以及蒙地卡羅模擬法做進一步之定量探討,最後並計算系統之整體風險值。結果顯示,一階可靠度分析法確實可改善蒙地卡羅模擬法耗時、精確度不足之缺點,且其於近似破壞點處做泰勒級數展開,是較均值一階二級動差法符合實際情況的分析方法,故能有效地應用在風險分析上。此外,對於石門水庫而言,因操作延遲所導致之溢流風險並不高,此可供水庫管理單位於颱風時期操作之參考;而系統風險分析之結果,則可做為水庫安全評估之參考依據!
The safety of reservoir not only affects its operation functions and huge economic benefit but also affects life well being, and property of people living downstream. Therefore, it is extremely important to enhance the safety of reservoir. In Taiwan, the earth dam is quite general. According to a previous statistical analysis of dam failure【13】, flood overflow is the major reason of earth dam failure. Therefore, we focus on flood overflow issue and intend to assess the risk of earth dam failure during typhoon seasons.
The risk of overflow in the Shih-Men Reservoir during typhoon seasons is investigated as a study case. First, we use the fault-tree analysis to proceed qualitative analysis. Then, the operation delay item in the fault-tree structure is chosen to proceed further quantitative analysis. We contrast the analysis results of the First Order Reliability Analysis Method (FORM), and the Mean-Value First Order Second Moment Method (MFOSM) with results of the Monte Carlo simulation method which is regarded as the accurate probability of overflow. At last, we calculate the system risk by fuzzy fault-tree analysis method. The results show that, the use of FORM for risk analysis not only can save the prolonged simulation time in Monte Carlo method; but also can prevent the inconsistency of MFOSM method. The outcome of this study can serve as a reference for both operation decisions during typhoon seasons and safety evaluation of Shih-Men reservoir.
目 錄…….……………………………………………………..i
表目錄…….……………………………………………………..iii
圖目錄…….……………………………………………………..iv
摘 要…….……………………………………………………..vi
第一章 緒論…….…………………………………………………..1
第二章 文獻與理論回顧…….………………………………………4
2.1系統風險分析方面…….………………………………………..4
2.2單一事件風險分析方面 ………………………………………..5
第三章 系統風險分析…….…………………………………………9
3.1失誤樹分析概念………………………………………………..9
3.2模糊集理論 ……………………………………………………..11
3.2.1模糊數…….…………….………………………………12
3.2.2模糊數運算……………….………………………………13
3.3模糊失誤樹分析 ...……………………………………………..14
3.4模糊重要性指數 ...……………………………………………..16
3.4.1模糊數之排序……….….………………………………16
3.4.2模糊重要性指數………...………………………………18
3.5應用例-土石壩洪水溢流風險探討………..…………………..18
第四章 風險分析理論介紹……….…………………………………23
4.1風險表示法…….…………………………………………………..23
4.2不確定性表示法…….……….……………………………………..26
4.3一階二級動差法 ……………………………………………………..26
4.3.1理論介紹………………….………………………………27
4.3.2均值一階二級動差法………..….………………………28
4.3.3一階可靠度(風險)分析法…..……….…………………29
第五章 風險模式之實例應用……….………………………….....36
5.1研究區域概述…….…………………………………………………36
5.1.1流域概況……………….………………………………36
5.1.2水庫基本資料………………….…………………………36
5.1.3水文站概況…………..……….…………………………39
5.2水庫防洪運用…….……………………………………………….41
5.2.1防洪運轉操作規則..…….………………………………41
5.2.2排洪設施基本資料…………….…………………………49
5.2.3水利法相關規定………….………………………………50
5.3雨量資料之不確定性分析………………………………………….52
5.3.1不確定性之產生……………………………………..52
5.3.2資料處理……………………………………………..52
5.4降雨-逕流分析……………………….…………………………..53
5.5水庫演算…….……………….………………………………….56
5.5.1概述…………….……….……………………..……..56
5.5.2理論說明……..………………………………………..58
5.6風險分析…….……………………………………………………59
5.6.1溢流風險模式建立….….………………….…….. 59
5.6.2系統風險分析方法.…….…………………….…...61
5.7結果與討論…….………………..…………………………………62
5.7.1溢流風險模式分析結果…..…..….…..……..……62
5.7.2系統風險分析結果……………………...……….…83
第六章 結論與建議…….…………………………………………….87
6.1結論…….………..…………..…………….……………………87
6.2建議…….……………………..…………………………….……90
參考文獻………….……………………………………………..92
中文部份
【 1】丁崇峰、許榮庭、劉長齡,「海堤設計暴潮位之風險率分析」,台灣水利第四十二卷第一期,1994。
【 2】王如意、易任,「應用水文學」,茂昌圖書公司,1986。
【 3】台灣省石門水庫管理局,「石門水庫竣工二十五週年紀念專輯」,1989。
【 4】吳國儒,「堤防溢流風險分析」,國立成功大學碩士論文,1991。
【 5】胡玉書,「模糊邏輯與可靠度技術之整合與運用」,機械工業,第一七八卷,1998。
【 6】財團法人中興工程顧問社,「淡水河、石門水庫與翡翠水庫防洪聯合作業研究報告」,1986。
【 7】高國欽,「蒸餾塔之失誤樹分析」,碩士論文,1992。
【 8】許恩菁、鄭克聲,「台灣北部地區暴雨雨型之研究」,第九屆水利工程研討會,1998。
【 9】孫世偉,「模糊邏輯在決策樹上之應用」,國立交通大學資訊科學研究所碩士論文,1995。
【10】黃翰林、徐義人、余家慶,「河堤溢流之風險分析」,農業工程學報,第四十三卷,第一期,1997。
【11】黃慶隆、田振宏,「明德水庫溢頂潰壩風險分析」,中國環境工程學刊,第三卷,第二期,1993。
【12】陳耀茂,「談模糊可靠度理論的現況與發展」,品質管制月刊,第三十一卷,第八期,1995。
【13】陳錦清、高憲彰,「土石壩安全評估」,地工技術雜誌,第58期,1996。
【14】陳榮松,「消減水文參數不確定性之堤防風險分析」,國立成功大學碩士論文,1987。
【15】郭振泰、楊德良、簡振和,「石門水庫操作模式與自動化監控系統規劃研究報告」,國立台灣大學水工試驗所,1990。
【16】郭萬全,「土壩溢流風險之研究」,國立成功大學碩士論文,1989。
【17】曾兆麒,「考慮缺水風險之水庫容量模擬分析」,國立成功大學碩士論文,1991。
【18】張景忠,「翡翠水庫洪水溢流風險分析之研究」,國立臺灣大學碩士論文,1997。
【19】張文綺,「下水道系統溢流風險分析之研究」,國立臺灣大學碩士論文,1996。
【20】劉長齡、黃志元,「水庫溢流之風險及不確定性分析」,第八屆工程研討會,1996。
【21】顏本琦、徐享崑、郭振泰,「水資源風險與可靠度分析簡介」,台灣水利季刊,第四十卷,第四期,1992。
英文部份
【22】Ang, A. H. S. and Tang, W. H., Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, Vol II , Decision, Risk and Reliability, John Wiley & Sons , Inc., New York, 1984.
【23】Borgman, L. E.,"Risk criteria" , Journal of Waterways and Harbors Division " , ASCE, Vol.89, No.WW3,PP.1-35, August 1963
【24】Cornoll,C.A., "Bounds on the reliability of Structural Systems", Journal of the Structural Division , ASCE, Vol. 93,No.ST1,pp. 171-200, Feb.1967.
【25】Duckstein, L. and I. Bogardi, "Application of Reliability Theory to Hydraulic Engineering Design", Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE, Vol.107, No. HY7 , PP.799-815, July 1981.
【26】Dettinger, M.D., and J.L. Wilson, "First order analysis of uncertainty in numerical models of groundwater flow ",1,Mathematical development , Water Resource Research .,17(1),149-161,1981.
【27】Devary, J.L., and P.G.Doctor, Pore velocity estimation uncertainties, Water Resour.Res.,18(4),1157-1164,1982.
【28】Fan, Lai and Toguchi, “Fault-Tree Analysis by Fuzzy Probability”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. R-32, No. 5, 1983.
【29】Freeze. R. A., A stochastic-conceptual analysis of one-dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media, Water Resour. Res., 11(5) , 725-741,1975.
【30】Hasofer, A. M., and N. Lind, Exact and invariant second-moment code format, J. Eng., 100,111-121,1974.
【31】Kim C.E., Ju Y.J., and Gens M., “Multilevel Fault Tree Analysis Using Fuzzy Numbers,” Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 23, No. 7, pp. 695-703, 1996.
【32】Liang G.S., and Wang M.J., ”Fuzzy Fault-Tree Analysis Using Failure Possibility,” Microelectron Reliability, Vol. 33,No. 4, pp. 583-597,1993.
【33】Nguyen, V. U., and R. N. Chowdhury, Simulation for risk analysis with correlated variables, Geotechnique, 35(1), 47-58,1985.
【34】Pan H.S, Yun W.Y., “Fault Tree Analysis with Fuzzy Gates”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 33, Nos. 3-4, pp. 569-572, 1997.
【35】 Plate, E.J. ,"Stochastic design in hydraulics:concepts for a broader application " , Stochastic Hydraulics ''92,Proc. 6th Int''l Symp., ed. by J.T. Kuo and G.F.Lin, pp. 1-15, National Taiwan Univ.,1992.
【36】Rackwitz, R., and B. Fiessler, Structural reliability and combined random load sequences, Comput. Struct., 9, 489-494, 1978.
【37】Sagar, B., Galerkin finite element procedure for analyzing flow through random media , Water Resour. Res. 14(6),1035-1044,1978.
【38】Smith, L., and R. A. Freeze,Stochastic analysis of steady state groundwater flow in a bounded domain, 1,One-dimensional simulations, Water Resour. Res., 15(3), 521-528, 1979a.
【39】Sykes,J. F., J.L.Wilson, and R.W.Andrews, Sensitivity analysis for steady state groundwater flow using adjoin operators ,Water Resour. Res., 21(3), 359-371 , 1985.
【40】Sitar, N.,J. D. Cawlfield, and A. D. Kiureghian, First-order reliability approach stochastic analysis of subsurface flow and contaminant transport, Water REs.. 23(5), 794-804, 1987.
【41】Schanz, R.W., "Evaluation of the Rackwitz-Fiessler Uncertainty Analysis Method for Environmental Fate and Transport Models " , Water Resource Research 28(4) , p.1071-1079 , 1992.
【42】Tang, W.H.,L.W.Mays, and Yen, B.C., "Optimal risk based design of storm sewer networks", Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division , ASCE,Vol. 101, No. EE3,pp. 381-398, June 1975.
【43】Warner,R.F. and Kabaila ,A.P.,"Monte Carlo Study of Structural Safety", Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE,Vol.94,No.ST12,PP.2847-2859,1968.
【44】Wood, E. F., "An Analysis of Flood Levee Reliability", Water Resources Reserach, Vol.13, No.3, PP.665-671, June 1977
【45】Yen, B. C. and W. H. Tang, "Risk-Safety Factor Relation for Storm Sewer Design ", Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division", ASCE, Vol.102, No.EE2, PP.509-516, Apr.1976
【46】Yen, B.C., "Safety factor in hydrology and hydraulic engineering", Reliability in Water Resources Management, ed. by E.A. Mcbean, K.W.Hipel, and T.E. Unny, pp. 389-407,Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado,1979.
【47】Yen,B.C., Cheng,S.T. and Melching, C.S.,"First-order reliability analysis", Stochastic and Risk Analysis in Hydraulic Engineering, ed. by B.C., Yen ,pp 1-36 , Water Resources Publications,Littleton, Colorado, 1986.
【48】Zadeh L.A., Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 1965.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top