臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究為衡量2004至2010年臺灣專利百大廠商研發績效，蒐集自經濟部智慧財產局與臺灣經濟新報 (TEJ) 35家廠商之資料，研究對象為連續四年進入臺灣專利百大之廠商，而後再擴充樣本期間至七年，樣本數共計245筆，樣本廠商又可依廠商規模區分為大廠商與小廠商。首先以隨機邊界法 (SFA) 與共同邊界模型 (Metafrontier) 分析廠商研發效率之影響，並分析大、小廠商的技術缺口比率 (TGR) 是否存在差異。進一步採用網絡資料包絡分析法 (Network DEA) ，衡量廠商其研發部門與銷售部門的績效管理能力。

實證結果提出以下兩點：
一、 廠商規模對研發績效有顯著且負向影響，且小廠商其技術缺口比率較佳，意即其生產技術水準較佳。
二、 整體而言，銷售部門效率優於研發部門效率。而研發部門仍需縮減12%的人力成本、9%的資本投入、4%的研發費用與23%的引證次數；銷售部門則需縮減22%的人力投入與2%的資本投入。

The purpose of this paper is to measure the R&D performance of Taiwanese firms which are belong to top 100 patent applicants during the period 2004-2010. First, we examine firm size effects by using stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) and Metafrontier. Furthermore, we analyze the difference between larger and smaller firms’ technology gap ratio (TGR). Next, we utilize Network DEA, in order to explore the performance of both R&D division and marketing division.

The results suggest the following two points：
1. The firms’ size has a significant but negative effect on the R&D performance. In addition, smaller firms have high TGR than larger firms.
2. On the whole, the performance in marketing division is better than in R&D division. We find that R&D division should decrease 12% labor、9% capital、4% R&D expenditure and 23% citation to approach efficiency. Also, marketing division should decrease 22% labor and 2% capital to improve their efficiency.

論文題目
論文口試委員審定書
謝 辭 i
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
目 錄 v
圖 目 錄 vii
表 目 錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究架構與流程 3

第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 廠商規模相關文獻 5
第二節 專利權相關文獻 6
第三節 應用隨機邊界法 (SFA) 相關文獻 7
第四節 應用共同邊界模型 (Metafrontier) 相關文獻 8

第三章 研究方法 13
第一節 隨機邊界法 13
第二節 共同邊界模型 15
第三節 網絡資料包絡分析法 (Network DEA) 18

第四章 資料來源與變數說明 21
第一節 資料來源 21
第二節 變數說明 22
第三節 基本敘述統計分析 23

第五章 實證分析 25
第一節 隨機邊界法估計結果 26
第二節 共同邊界模型估計結果 29
第三節 網絡資料包絡分析法估計結果 34

第六章 結論與建議 39
第一節 結論 39
第二節 限制與建議 40

參考文獻 41
附 錄 45

中文部分
1. 吳濟華與何伯正 (2008)，《組織效率與生產力評估：資料包絡分析法》，初版，臺北：前程文化事業有限公司。
2. 吳濟華與何柏正 (2009) 譯，Coelli, Rao, O’Donnel and Battese著，《效率與生產力分析入門》，二版，臺北：前程文化事業有限公司。
3. 徐啟升與黃志宏 (2009)， 「國際化與公司治理對臺灣資訊電子業生產效率之影響」，《東吳經濟商學學報》，115-143。
4. 許鎦響與許蕙心 (2009)，「臺灣IC設計產業生產效率評估/SFA之應用」，《嶺東學報》，26，93-114。
5. 黃鏡如、傅祖壇與黃美瑛 (2008)，《績效評估－效率與生產力之理論與應用》，初版，臺北：新陸書局股份有限公司。
6. 楊志海與陳忠榮 (2002)，「研究發展，專利與生產力─臺灣製造業的實證研究」，《經濟論文叢刊》，30(1)，27-48。
7. 鄭秀玲與黃國綱 (2005)，「政府資助的產業創新活動：以工研院科專計畫為例」，《人文及社會科學集刊》，17(3)，459-489。
8. 顏晃平與張靜文 (2011)，「本國銀行業成本效率之研究─共同邊界函數應用」，《經濟研究》，47(1)，147-181。

英文部份
1. Aigner, D., C. Lovell, and P. Schmidt (1977), “Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models* 1,” Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21-37.
2. Artz, K. W., P. M. Norman, D. E. Hatfield, and L. B. Cardinal (2010), “A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of R&D, Patents, and Product Innovation on Firm Performance,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(5), 725-740.
3. Baruch, Y. (1997), “High Technology Organization - What It Is, What It Isn''t,” International Journal of Technology Management, 13(2), 179-195.
4. Battese, G. E. (1992), “Frontier production functions and technical efficiency: a survey of empirical applications in agricultural economics,” Agricultural Economics, 7(3-4), 185-208.
5. Battese, G. E. and T. J. Coelli (1992), “Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3(1), 153-169.
6. Battese, G. E. and T. J. Coelli (1995), “A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data,” Empirical Economics, 20(2), 325-332.
7. Battese, G. E., D. S. P. Rao, and C. J. O''Donnell (2004), “A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(1), 91-103.
8. Campbell, J. (1977), “On the natural of organizational effectiveness,” Jossey, San Franciscos.
9. Cooper, W., L. Seiford, and K. Tone (2000), “Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications References and DEA-Solver Software,” Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10. Diaz, M. A., and R. Sanchez (2008), “Firm size and productivity in Spain: a stochastic frontier analysis,” Small Business Economics, 30(3), 315-323.
11. Farsi, M., M. Filippini, and M. Kuenzle (2003), “Unobserved heterogeneity in stochastic cost frontier models: a comparative analysis,” Oviedo: University of Oviedo.
12. Ishii, Y. (2010), “The Role Of Patent, Citation And Objection Stocks In The Productivity Analysis Of R&D—Using Japanese Company Data,” International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(5), 947-963.
13. Jefferson, G. H., B. Huamao, G. Xiaojing, and Y. Xiaoyun (2006), “R&D performance in Chinese industry,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(4-5), 345-366.
14. Jung, S. and H. K. Pyo (2009), “A Stochastic Frontier Analysis on Firm-level Total Factor Productivity and Technical Efficiency in Korea.”
15. Lee, C. Y. and T. Sung (2005), “Schumpeter''s legacy: A new perspective on the relationship between firm size and R&D,” Research Policy, 34(6), 914-931.
16. Lu, W. C. and T. K. Liu (2010), “Malmquist Indices of R&D Productivity Growth in Taiwanese IC-Design Industry, ” Global Journal of Business Research, 4(1), 105-114.
17. Mariano, M. J., R. Villano, and E. Fleming (2011), “Technical Efficiency of Rice Farms in Different Agroclimatic Zones in the Philippines: An Application of a Stochastic Metafrontier Model*,” Asian Economic Journal, 25(3), 245-269.
18. Matawie, K. and A. Assaf (2008), “A metafrontier model to assess regional efficiency differences,” Journal of Modelling in Management, 3(3), 268-276.
19. Meeusen, W. and J. van den Broeck (1977), “Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error,” International Economic Review, 18(2), 435-444.
20. O’Donnell, C. J., D. S. P. Rao, and G. E. Battese (2008), “Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios,” Empirical Economics, 34(2), 231-255.
21. Panzer, J. C. (1989), “Technological determinants of firm and industry structure,” in Schamalensee, R. and R. D. Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization.
22. Schettini, D., D. C. Igliori, and C. R. Azzoni (2008), “Productive Efficiency across Regions in Brazil: a Spatial Stochastic Frontier Analysis.”
23. Shefer, D. and A. Frenkel (2005), “R&D, firm size and innovation: an empirical analysis, ” Technovation, 25(1), 25-32.
24. Tsai, K. H. (2005), “R&D productivity and firm size: A nonlinear examination,” Technovation, 25, 795-803.
25. Tsai, K. H. and J. C. Wang (2005), “Does R&D performance decline with firm size？─A re-examination in terms of elasticity,” Research Policy, 34(6), 996-976.
26. Tsutsui, T. and K. Tone (2007), “Application of Network DEA Model to Vertically Integrated Electric Utilities,” GRIPS Discussion Paper, 3-7.
27. Wakasugi, R. and F. Koyata (1997), “R&D, firm size and innovation outputs: are japanese firms efficient in product development?” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(5), 383-392.