臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

根據ACI 318–02，以剪力跨度 a 與梁總深 h 之比值﹙a / h﹚來區分，當a / h ≦ 2.0時稱之為短梁。亦可使用剪力跨度 a 與有效深度 d 之比值﹙a / d﹚來區分，當a / d ≦ 2.5時稱之為短梁，反之則為長梁。對於剪力強度之分析方法，規範是建議以壓拉桿模式來分析短梁，以傳統剪力經驗公式來分析長梁。本研究主要探討以三種壓拉桿模式作為分析短梁之適用性，除了應用於矩形梁外，另外也對T型梁作分析，藉以比較T型梁與矩形梁在分析上有何不同之處。
　　本研究之試體針對不同剪力跨深比﹙a / d﹚，分別施作8根矩形梁與10根T型梁。試體剪力筋配置方式分為無剪力筋和依規範規定兩種。由實驗結果得知，無論有無配置剪力筋之矩形短梁或T型短梁，使用軟化壓拉桿模式分析剪力強度，其結果有一準確度。另外由實驗結果亦可發現在預測剪力強度時，應以實際斷面形式去做分析，若以矩形斷面代替，則分析結果會較不準確。

　According to ACI 318-02, the RC beam with a / h ≦ 2.0 or a / d ≦ 2.5 so called as deep beams. The code suggested that the shear strength of deep beams be calculated using strut and tie model, and using the traditional experimental formula for the shear strength of normal-span beam.
This study discusses the effect of three types of strut and tie model methods to analyze the tested deep beams. Meanwhile, these models applied to the prediction on not only the rectangular sectional beams but also T-sectional beams.
Experiment specimens were made according to different ratios of a / d. That is, 8 rectangular beams and 10 T-beams were provided for testing The transverse reinforcement has two type of arrangement. One has no transverse reinforcement and the other has transverse and horizontal shear reinforcement designed according to ACI code. The experimental result shoes that prediction on rectangular beam and T-beams using softened strut and tie model is more accurate It also was found that the flanges contributed to some amount of shear strength of deep beams. The prediction results might not be accurate, if engineers did not consider the contribution of slab flanges for shear strength evaluation.

摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 VIII
圖目錄 X
第一章　緒論 1
1–1　研究動機 1
1–2　研究方法及目的 2
第二章　文獻回顧 3
2–1　壓拉桿理論簡介 3
2–1–1　節點強度 4
2–1–2　拉桿強度 5
2–1–3　壓桿強度 5
2–2　修正壓力場理論 12
2–2–1　力平衡方程式 13
2–2–2　材料組成率 16
2–3　鋼筋應變之影響 16
第三章　剪力強度計算模式 17
3–1　Collins之壓拉桿模型 17
3–2　軟化壓拉桿模型簡算法 20
3–3　ACI 318–02附錄A設計方法 25
第四章　實驗規劃與執行 29
4–1　試體規劃 29
4–2　試體材料 29
4–2–1　鋼筋 30
4–2–2　混凝土 30
4–3　試體設計 30
4–4　試體製作 32
4–4–1　鋼筋籠製作 32
4–4–2　模板製作 33
4–4–3　試體澆置 33
4–4–4　試體養護 33
4–5　實驗設置 34
4–5–1　位移量測系統 34
4–6　實驗步驟 35
4–7　實驗數據分析 36
4–7–1　撓曲應變 36
4–7–2　斜拉應變 36
第五章　實驗結果 38
5–1　a / d = 1.0 試體 38
5–2　a / d = 1.5 試體 39
5–3　a / d = 2.0 試體 40
5–4　a / d = 2.5 試體 42
第六章　分析與討論 44
6–1　預測與量測剪力強度之分析 44
6–1–1　矩形深梁 45
6–1–2　T型深梁 46
6–2　水平壓桿深度 48
6–3　矩形與T型深梁剪力差異 49
6–3–1　無剪力筋矩形深梁與T型深梁之差異 49
6–3–2　所有矩形深梁與T型深梁之差異 49
6–3–3　破壞模式 50
6–4　垂直與水平剪力筋之貢獻 50
第七章　結論與建議 52
7–1　結論 52
7–2　建議 54
參考文獻 55
附錄A 138

1.ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, ACI 318-02 & Commentary ACI 318R-02,(2002).
2.Collins, M., and Mitchell, D., Prestressed Concrete Structure, Prentice Hall, New Jersey,766pp.(1991)
3.CSA Committee A23.3, “Design of Concrete Structures for Building”, CAN3-A23.3-M84, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Canada, 281 pp(1984).
4.Hwang, Shyh-Jiann, and Lee, Hung-Jen, “Strength Prediction for Discontinuity Regions by Softened Strut-and-Tie Model,” Journal of Structural Engineering, pp. 1519-1526(2002).
5.李宏仁、黃世建「鋼筋混凝土結構不連續區域之剪力強度評估―軟化壓拉桿模型簡算法之實例應用」，結構工程，第十七卷，第四期，第53～70頁(2002)。
6.ASCE-ACI Committee 445 on Shear and Torsion, “Recent Approaches to Shear Design of Structural Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, pp. 1375-11417(1998).
7.Belarbi A., and Hsu, T.T.C., “Constitutive Laws of Softened Concrete in Biaxial Tension-Compression,” ACI Structural Journal, September-October, pp.562-573 (1995).
8.Russo, G., Venir, R., and Pauletta, M., “Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams―Shear Strength Model and Design Formula,” ACI Structural Journal, May-June, pp. 429-437(2005).
9.Matamoros, A. B., and Wong, K. H., “Design of Simply Supported Deep Beams Using Strut-and-Tie Models,” ACI Structural Journal, November-December, pp. 704-712(2003).
10. Vollum, R. L., and Newman, J. B., ”Strut and tie models for analysis/design of external beam―column joint,”Magazine of Concrete Research, pp. 415-425(1999).
11.Su, R. K. L., and Chandler, A. M., “Design criteria for unified strut and tie models,” Prog. Struct. Engng Mater, pp.288-298 (2001).
12.Cho, S. H., and Kim, Y. I.,“Effects of Steel Fibers on Short Beams Load in Shear,” ACI Structural Journal, November-December, pp.765-774(2003).
13.Thompson, M. K., Jirsa, J. o., John E., and E. Breen, “CCT Nodes Anchored by Headed Bars―Part 2: Capacity of Nodes,” ACI Structural Journal, January-February, pp. 65-73(2006).
14.Hsu, T. T. C., “Toward a Unified Nomentclature for Reinforced-Concrete Theory,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.122, NO. 3, Mar, pp.275-283 (1996).
15.Dale, J.T.,” The shear strength of partially prestressed concrete beams,” Report No. 317, Deport of Eng., Univ. of Auckland, New Zealand,351 pp (1983).
16.王勇智，「E世代災害防治及永續發展工程教育－分頁6.工程系統分析及對策」，教育部計畫，(2001-2005)。
17.連建民，「跨深比較大時鋼筋混凝土深梁之行為」，碩士論文，國立台灣科技大學營建工程系，台北(2005)。
18.謝明杰，「剪跨與深度比不同時鋼筋混凝土深梁之行為」，碩士論文，國立台灣科技大學營建工程系，台北(2004)。
19.蔡耀賢，「高強度鋼筋混凝土深梁之剪力強度」，碩士論文，國立台灣科技大學營建工程系，台北(2005)。
20.廖御仲，「應用壓拉桿模式於預力深梁之剪力強度評估」，碩士論文，國立屏東科技大學營建工程系，屏東(2004)。
21.林振鴻，「鋼筋混凝土托架試驗與壓拉桿模式分析之研究」，碩士論文，國立雲林科技大學營建工程系，雲林 (2005)。
22.蕭乃維，「無腹筋RC梁利用壓拉桿模式預測剪力強度之研究」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程系，中壢(2006)。