臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

學習歷程檔案是近來深受矚目且積極發展的評量方式之一，然現今在教室中實施的學習歷程檔案仍有以下若干困難：1. 資料儲存、管理的困難。2. 評量計分標準制定的困難。3. 目前的學習歷程檔案仍欠缺自我反省思考。
為解決以上困難，本研究建構一個以反省思考為焦點的網路化學習歷程檔案(web-based reflective portfolio)系統，並探討學生在學習歷程檔案中，觀摩、評比及學習筆記等學習活動的自我反思表現，以及這些反思活動對學習效果的影響。研究中以台灣師範大學，選修資訊教育80位大學生作為研究對象，結合量與質的分析方法。量的資料方面，分析受試者作品在成績的成效表現，及受試者在問卷中對反省思考問題的表現；質的資料方面，以Kember, et al.(1999)對反省思考定義的七個階層對學習日誌做分類並進一步分析參與者的反思活動歷程。
研究結果如下：一、在網路化的學習歷程檔案系統中加入適當的機制和活動，如學習日誌或自我/同儕評量活動，可以建立以反省思考為焦點的學習歷程檔案。二、學生在學習歷程檔案的環境，可以表現出中等程度的反省思考，但並未表現出最高層次的反省思考。三、有採用學習日誌或自我/同儕評量活動的實驗組，其反省思考程度比未採用學習日誌或自我/同儕評量活動的控制組來得
高，學習總成績也表現較佳。

Recently, portfolio is popular and fast growing in instructional environment. However, there are some difficulties when using portfolio in classroom, such as storing and managing data and developing scoring criteria. Moreover, using portfolio does not always facilitate students’ reflective thinking.
To solve the above problems, this research establishes a web-based reflective portfolio system that focuses on reflective thinking. The research investigates the representation of the students’ reflective thinking in learning activities such as observing and evaluating others’ works, and writing learning journals. The research also evaluates the learning activities that affect students’ learning performance. The subjects are eighty students who took the course of Information Education in National Taiwan Normal University. The research uses quantitative and qualitative analysis method.
Regarding to quantitative information, we analyze the grades of students’ products and students’ representation on reflective thinking problem. Regarding to qualitative data, we classify students’ learning journals according to seven level of reflective thinking which identifies by Kember et al. We also analyze participators’ process of reflective thinking activities. The results of the research are as follows：
1. In the web-based portfolio system, use of appropriate mechanism and activities, such as learning journals or self/peer assessment, can establish the portfolio that focuses on reflective thinking.
2. In portfolio environment, students only demonstrate reflective thinking of medium level.
3. The experimental group which adopts learning journal and self/peer assessment gets higher level of reflective thinking and better grade than the control group.

附表目錄 iii
附圖目錄 v
第一章 緒論 1
1-1 研究背景 1
1-2 研究目的 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
2-1 學習歷程檔案的概念 5
2-2 學習歷程檔案評量 8
2-3 電子化學習歷程檔案 10
2-4 反省思考的概念 13
2-5 結語 16
第三章 網路化學習歷程檔案系統規劃與實作 17
3-1系統設計的考量 17
3-2 發展工具 18
3-3 系統架構 20
3-4 系統功能 21
第四章 實驗方法 36
4-1 實驗對象 36
4-2 實驗設計 36
4-3 實驗工具 36
4-4 實驗程序 37
第五章 結果與討論 40
5-1 結果 40
5-2 討論 70
第六章 結論與建議 72
6-1結論 72
6-2 建議 72
附錄 74
參考文獻 79

林碧珍(民90)。協助教師實踐學生數學學習歷程檔案之行動研究。新竹師院學報，14期，頁163-213。
岳修平，王郁青(2000)。電子化學習歷程檔案實施之態度研究。教育心理學報，31卷，2期，頁65-84。
張美玉(民89)。歷程檔案評量的理念與實施。科學教育月刊，231期。
張美玉(民90)。從多元智能的觀點談歷程檔案評量在教育上的應用。教育研究資訊，9(1)，頁32-54。
張振成(1997)。教學評量的新趨勢：實作評量與檔案評量。中等教育，48卷，6期。
蔡仁勝(1999)。卷宗(又名檔案)評量的前景。北縣教育，29期。
曾吉雄(民88，7月)。新式評量--檔案評量。教育資料文摘，44(1)，頁133-137。
張麗麗(民89)。「什麼樣的檔案才值得…?」--談自主學習檔案的基本要素。屏縣教育季刊， 4期。
張基成，童宜慧(2000)。網路化學習歷程檔案系統之建構與評鑑---一個電子化的真實性學習評量工具。遠距教育，13、14期，頁78-90。
鄒慧英(民89)。國小寫作檔案評量應用之探討。初等教育學報，13期，頁141-181。
Allan C., Jan H., & John R.F. (1993).Three different views of student: The role of technology in assessing student performance.The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 3(2) , 205-217.
Barrett, H. (1997). Collaborative planning for electronic portfolios: Asking strategic questions. Electronic Portfolio Planning Issues. http://transition.alaska.edu/www/portfolio/planning.html
Bleakley, A. (2000). Adrift without a life belt: Reflective self-assessment in a post-modern age. Teaching in Higher Education, 5 ( 4), 405-418.
Carlson, R. D. (1999). Portfolio assessment of instructional technology. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 27(1), 81-92 .
Chang, C. H. (2001). A study on the evaluation and effectiveness analysis of web-based learning portfolio(WBLP). British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 435-458.
Chang, C. K., Chen, G. D. & Ou, K. L.( 1998). Student portfolio analysis by data cube technology for decision support of web-based classroom teacher. Journal of Educational Computing Research ,19(3), 307-328.
Courtney, A. M. & Abodeeb, T. L. (1999). Diagnostic-reflective portfolios. Reading Teacher, 52 (7), 708.
Dinkelman ,T. (2000). An inquiry into the development of critical reflection in secondary student teachers.Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(2), 195-222 .
Eyler ,J. (2001). Creating your reflection map. New Directions for Higher Education, no.114 ,35-43.
Griffith, B. A., Frieden, G. ( 2000) . Facilitating reflective thinking in counselor education.Counselor Education & Supervision, 40( 2), 82-93.
Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995).Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49 .
Jonathan, A. S. & Robert, T. B. (1997). Mirror,mirror on the wall,which is the fairest test of all? An Examination of the Equitability of Portfolio Assessment Relative to Standardized Tests, 67(3), 472-506.
Kember, D., Jones, A., Loke, A., Mckay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., Webb, C., Wong, F., Wong, M., & Yeung, E. (1999). Determining the level of reflective thinking from students’ written journals using a coding scheme based on the work of Mezirow. International Journal of Lifelong Education,18(1), 18-30.
Kirk, R. (2000). A study of the use of a private chat room to increase reflective thinking in pre-service teachers. College Student Journal, 34(1), 115-122.
Krause , S. (1996). Portfolios in teacher education:Effects of instruction on preservice teacher’early comprehension of the portfolio process. Journal of Teacher Eduction,47(.2),130-138.
Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Design of a networked portfolio system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 492-494.
Milson, A. J., & Brantley, S. M. (1999). Theme-based portfolio assessment in social studies teacher education. Social Education, 65(6), 374-376.
Paulson, F. L. , Paulson, P.R., & Mayer, C.A. (1991).What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48, 60-63.
Rogers, G. M., & Williams, J. (1999).Building a better portfolio. ASEE Prism, 8(5), p 30.
Slater, T. F., And Others. (1997). Impact and dynamics of portfolio assessment and traditional assessment in a college physics course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (3) , 255-71.
Sung, Y. T., Lin, C. S., Lee, C. L., & Chang, K. E. (under review). Learning through experiment-proposal evaluation: An application of web-based self- and peer assessment. Paper submitted to Teaching of Psychology.
Sung, Y. T., Chiou, S. K., & Chang, K. E.(2002). T he design and application of a web-based self- and peer-assessment.Technical report No.9002, ITS Lab, National Taiwan Normal University.
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Lee, C. L. (2002). Improving experimental project evaluation through web-based self- and peer assessment. Paper to be presented at the 13th International Conference of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, Nashville, March 25-30.
Sparks-Langer, G. M., Simmons, J. M., Pasch, M., Colton, A. & Starko, A. (1990). Reflective pedagogical thinking: How can we promote it and measure it? Journal of Teacher Education, 41(5), 23-32.
Stiggins, R. J. (1997). Student-centered classroom assessment (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Tillema H. H., & Smith, K. (2000). Learning from portfolios: Differential use of feedback in portfolio construction. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26, 193-210.
Wolf, D. P. (1989). Portfolio assessment: Sampling student work. Educational Leadership, 46, 35-39.
Wolfe, E. W., & Miller, T. R. (1997).Barriers to the implementation of portfolio assessment in secondary education. Applied Measurement in Education, 10(3), 235-251.
Yost, D. S., Sentner, S. M., & Forlenza-Bailey, A. (2000). An examination of the construct of critical reflection: Implications for teacher education programming in the 21st century.Journal of Teacher Education, 51(1), 39-49.