跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.44) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/01/01 19:37
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:劉玉立
研究生(外文):Yu-Li Liu
論文名稱:分散投資與集中投資對公司績效的影響:以臺灣上市電子產業赴大陸為例
論文名稱(外文):The Performance Pattern of Decentralized Investment and Concentrated Investment in China: The case of Electronic Companies Listed in Taiwan
指導教授:王維康王維康引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wei-Kang Wang
口試委員:盧文民林鳳儀
口試委員(外文):Wen-Min LuFengyi Lin
口試日期:2015-06-22
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:元智大學
系所名稱:財務金融暨會計碩士班(會計學程)
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:一般商業學類
論文種類:學術論文
畢業學年度:103
語文別:英文
論文頁數:39
中文關鍵詞:投資大陸動態資料包絡分析營運績效海外投資
外文關鍵詞:investment in ChinaDynamic Data Envelopment Analysisoperating performanceinvestment oversea
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:221
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本文旨在探討臺商赴大陸集中投資與分散投資對其經營績效的影響。隨著中國大陸躍升為臺灣之最大出口國,兩岸間之依存度意謂日益加深,促使國內企業赴中國大陸投資者眾,但至中國大陸投資是否真能將企業經營推向另一高峰,透過本研究使其於前往投資中國大陸之際能將風險降至最低,致提升公司整體經營績效。茲因臺灣電子產業在大陸的發展性較其他產業更為完整,亦是目前臺灣公司赴大陸投資排名第一的產業,故本研究特以其為主要研究代表產業,分別探討其赴大陸投資深度與廣度,對公司經營績效影響。首先利用無母數檢定探討投資大陸與非投資大陸對績效影響,再整合資料包絡分析法與迴歸建構出公司深度與廣度的關係。研究樣本為2009-2013年的83家臺灣上市櫃電子公司。實證結果顯示,規模越大的公司投資大陸,其績效越好。深度與公司績效呈現負相關,由於充滿未知變數因缺乏以及承擔高學習成本,廣度與公司績效呈現正向關係,公司往往企圖進行中國的海外投资以達到更好的公司績效。
The aim of this study is to explore the efficiency of Decentralized Investment and Concentrated Investment in China. As the Chinese mainland surpassed the largest exporter of Taiwan, dependence between the two sides means deepening and prompting investors of domestic enterprises to go public in China; however, it really means bringing investments in mainland China businesses to new heights. Through this research it on occasion to invest in mainland China can minimize risks, caused improve the overall business performance. As Taiwan's electronics industry is more complete than other industries, Taiwanese companies are currently ranked first in the mainland investment industry, thus, this study is representative of the industry as the main study to explore the depth of its investment in the mainland, as well as the breadth of the company's operating performance impact. First, the number of test without the mother continent to explore the impact of investment and non-investment performance of the mainland, and then integrates data envelopment analysis and regression construct the depth and breadth of relations firm. The empirical results show that, the larger the company's investment in mainland China, the better the performance. The depth degree of investment in China has a negative and significant relationship due to firms’ lack of sufficient know-how, thus, they suffer from a higher learning cost. The breadth degree of investment shows a positive and statistically significant relationship. Thus, companies tend to implement overseas investment dimensions in China to achieve better corporate performance.
Abstract in Chinese i
Abstract in English ii
Acknowledgements iii
Table of Contents iv
List of Tables v
List of Figures vi
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 7
2.1 Overview of the oversea investment in China 7
2.2 Firm Performance – Data Envelopment Analysis 9
2.3 Firm performance with an investment in China 10
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH DESIGN 13
3.1. Dynamic production process for a listed Electronic company of Taiwan 13
3.2. Data collection and description 15
3.3. Efficiency evaluation-dynamic DEA approach 20
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 23
4.1. Dynamic efficiency analysis for “investment in China” and “Non- investment in China” companies 23
4.2. Characteristics and performance of electronic companies within an investment in China 25
4.3.1. The scope of investment 26
4.3.2. Electronic investment in China 27
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS 32
REFERENCE 35
REFERENCE
Allen, L., &; Pantzalis, C. (1996). Valuation of the operating flexibility of multinational corporations. Journal of international business studies, 633-653.
Anderson, E., &; Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of international business studies, 1-26.
Agarwal, S., &; Ramaswami, S. N. (1992). Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors. Journal of international business studies, 1-27.
Buckley, P. J., &; Casson, M. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise (Vol. 1). London: Macmillan.
Berg, S. (2010). Water utility benchmarking: Measurement, methodologies, and performance incentives. Iwa Publishing.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
Bogetoft, P. (2008). Network DEA: some applications and illustrations. Network DEA, 5-12.
Bradley, F., &; Gannon, M. (2000). Does the firm’s technology and marketing profile affect foreign market entry?. Journal of International Marketing, 8(4), 12-36.
Cavusgil, S. T., &; Zou, S. (1994). Marketing strategy-performance relationship: an investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. The Journal of Marketing, 1-21.
Claver, E., &; Quer, D. (2005). Choice of market entry mode in China: The influence of firm-specific factors. Journal of General Management, 30(3), 51-70.
Chen, H. (1999). International performance of multinationals: A hybrid model. Journal of World Business, 34(2), 157-170.
Chen, C. M. (2009). A network-DEA model with new efficiency measures to incorporate the dynamic effect in production networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 194(3), 687-699.
Chen, H., &; Chen, T. J. (1998). Network linkages and location choice in foreign direct investment. Journal of international business studies, 445-467.
Caves, R. E. (1971). International corporations: The industrial economics of foreign investment. Economica, 1-27.
Casson, M., &; Singh, S. (1993). Corporate research and development strategies: the influence of firm, industry and country factors on the decentralization of R&;D. R&;D Management, 23(2), 91-108.
Chen, C.Y. ( 2009). The factors affecting activity-based costing system adoption by the CPA firms in Taiwan. Journal of Business Administration, 67:71-103.
Choi, J. S., Kwak, Y. M., &; Choe, C. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Korea. Australian Journal of Management, 35(3), 291-311.
Doukas, J., &; Travlos, N. G. (1988). The effect of corporate multinationalism on shareholders' wealth: Evidence from international acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 43(5), 1161-1175.
Dunning, J. H. (1980). Towards an eclectic theory of international production: some empirical tests. Journal of international business studies, 11(1), 9-31.
Dunning, J. H. (1981). Explaining the international direct investment position of countries: towards a dynamic or developmental approach. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 117(1), 30-64.
Dunning, John H. (1988). The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions. Journal of International Business Studies 19(1):1–31.
Dunning, J. H. (1999). Multinational Enterprise and the Global Economy (Wokingham, 1993). Teresa da Silva Lopes, The impact of multinational investment on alcoholic consumption, Business and Economic History, 28(2), 109-22.
Dunning, J. H. (2000). The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International business review, 9(2), 163-190.
Fagre, N., &; Wells Jr, L. T. (1982). Bargaining power of multinations and host governments. Journal of International Business Studies, 9-23.
Fung, L., Liu, J., &; Wang, F. (2013). Are FDI in China and Parent Firm Exports Substitutes or Complements? An Empirical Study of Taiwanese Manufacturing Firms. Taiwan Economic Review, 41, 167-194.
Grosse, R., &; Trevino, L. J. (1996). Foreign direct investment in the United States: An analysis by country of origin. Journal of international business studies, 139-155.
Golany, B., &; Roll, Y. (1989). An application procedure for DEA. Omega, 17, 237-250.
Howells, J., James, A., &; Malik, K. (2003). The sourcing of technological knowledge: distributed innovation processes and dynamic change. R&;D Management, 33(4), 395-409.
Hung, S. W., He, D. S., &; Lu, W. M. (2014). Evaluating the dynamic performances of business groups from the carry-over perspective: A case study of Taiwan׳ s semiconductor industry. Omega, 46, 1-10.
Hsiao, H. C., Chang, H., Cianci, A. M., &; Huang, L. H. (2010). First financial restructuring and operating efficiency: evidence from Taiwanese commercial banks. Journal of Banking &; Finance, 34(7), 1461-1471.
Hymer, S.H. (1990). The international operations of national firms: a study of direct foreign investment. Ph.D thesis, Cambridge, MIT Press.
Lin, F. J. (2010). The determinants of foreign direct investment in China: The case of Taiwanese firms in the IT industry. Journal of Business Research, 63(5), 479-485.
Luo, Y., Zhao, H., Wang, Y., &; Xi, Y. (2011). Venturing abroad by emerging market enterprises. Management International Review, 51(4), 433-459.
Lin, F. (2010). The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in China: The Case of Taiwanese Firms in the IT Industry. Journal of Business Research; 63, 479-485.
Li, J., Qian, G., Lam, K., &; Wang, D. (2000). Breaking into China: Strategic considerations for multinational corporations. Long Range Planning, 33(5), 673-687.
Lu, W., &; Hung, S. (2010). Performance efficiency of offshore business groups in China—how Taiwanese firms perform. Asia Pacific Management Review, 15(3), 391-412.
Liu, M.C., Chen, S.H. (2007)b. Cross-border R&;D network and R&;D internationalization: a perspective of oversea subsidiary. NTU Management Review 18 (1), 211–238.
Lee, S.C., Wang, H.Y. &; Liu, J., (2006). DEA-based manufacturing technology innovation resource allocation efficiency, Industrial Technology &; Economy, 25(3): 112-115.
Johanson, J., &; Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm-a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of international business studies, 23-32.
Knight, G. (2000). Entrepreneurship and marketing strategy: The SME under globalization. Journal of International Marketing, 8(2), 12-32.
Kumar, V., &; Subramanian, V. (1997). A contingency framework for the mode of entry decision. Journal of world Business, 32(1), 53-72.
Kao, C. (2010). Malmquist productivity index based on common-weights DEA: The case of Taiwan forests after reorganization. Omega, 38(6), 484-491.
Klopp GA. (1985). The analysis of the efficiency of production system with multiple inputs and outputs. Dissertation [PhD thesis]. Chicago: University of Illinois, Industrial and System Engineering College.
Kaoru Tone, Miki Tsutsui. (2014). Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega 38:145-156.
Kojima K. (1978). Direct foreign investment: a Japanese model of multinational business operations. London: Croom Helm.
Kim, W. C., &; Hwang, P. (1992). Global strategy and multinationals' entry mode choice. Journal of International Business Studies, 29-53.
Kuo, H. C., &; Li, Y. (2003). A dynamic decision model of SMEs' FDI. Small Business Economics, 20(3), 219-231.
Kim, W. S., &; Lyn, E. O. (1986). Excess market value, the multinational corporation, and Tobin's q-ratio. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(1), 119-125.
Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, S. S., &; Aulakh, P. S. (2002). Multinationality and firm performance: The moderating role of R&;D and marketing capabilities. Journal of international business studies, 79-97.
Mascarenhas, B., Baveja, A., &; Jamil, M. (1998). Dynamics of core competencies in leading multinational companies. California Management Review, 40, 117-132.
Manolova, T. S., Brush, C. G., Edelman, L. F., &; Greene, P. G. (2002). Internationalization of Small Firms Personal Factors Revisited. International Small Business Journal, 20(1), 9-31.
Markides, C. C., &; Williamson, P. J. (1994). Related diversification, core competences and corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2), 149-165.
Morck, R., &; Yeung, B. (1992). Why investors value multinationality. Journal of Business, 165-187.
McNaughton, R. B., &; Bell, J. (2000). Channel switching between domestic and foreign markets. Journal of International Marketing, 9(1), 24-39.
Malmquist, S. (1953). Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de Estadistica y de Investigacion Operativa, 4(2), 209-242.
Nemoto J, Goto M. (2003). Measurement of dynamic efficiency in production: an application of data envelopment analysis to Japanese electric utilities. Journal of Productivity Analysis 19(2–3):191–210.
Park KS, Park K (2009). Measurement of multiperiod aggregative efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research 193(2):567–80.
Pai, M.Na. (2005). The impacts of mainland China investment scale on financial performance, using listed motherboard and PC board companies as examples. Economic Situation and Review 4: 58-78.
Root FR. (1987). International trade and investment. Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Company.
Seiford, .M., &;Zhu,J. (1999).Profitability and market ability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks. Management Science, 45, 1270–1288.
Su, R.X. (2009). Management strategies for Taiwan electrical industry investing in China. Taiwan Economic Review, 30(2):175-204.
Sueyoshi T, Aoki S. (2001). A use of a nonparametric statistic for DEA frontier shift: the Kruskal and Wallis rank test. Omega, 29(1):1–18.
Sueyoshi T, Sekitani K. (2005). Returns to scale in dynamic DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 161(2):536–44.
Smeets, Roger and E. M. Bosker. (2011). Leaders, Laggards, and Technology Seeking Strategies, Journal of Economic Behavior &; Organization 80(3):481–497.
Tone, K., &; Tsutsui, M. (2010). Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega, 38(3), 145-156.
Von Geymueller, P. (2009). Static versus dynamic DEA in electricity regulation: The case of US trans-mission system operators. Central European Journal of Operations Research 17(4): 397-413.
Wu, M. F. (2012). The Effects of Balanced Scorecard Implementation on the Intellectual Capital Accumulation of Taiwan-listed IT Companies: Using Corporate Innovation Activities as the Moderator. The Journal of Global Business Management, 8(2), 82-93.
Wang, Huai. (2009). PRC market entry mode of Taiwanese small-medium enterprises. The Journal of Chaoyang University of Technology, 1:211-238.
Woodcock, C. P., Beamish, P. W., &; Makino, S. (1994). Ownership-based entry mode strategies and international performance. Journal of international business studies, 253-273.
Wang, K., Yu, S., &; Zhang, W. (2013). China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency: a DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(5), 1117-1127.
Wang, W. K., Lu, W. M., Kweh, Q. L., &; Lai, H. W. (2014). Does corporate social responsibility influence the corporate performance of the US telecommunications industry?. Telecommunications Policy, 38(7), 580-591.
Lu, W. M., Wang, W. K., &; Kweh, Q. L. (2014). Intellectual capital and performance in the Chinese life insurance industry. Omega, 42(1), 65-74.
Yang, C., &; Hung, S. W. (2003). Taiwan's dilemma across the Strait: lifting the ban on semiconductor investment in China. Asian Survey, 43(4), 681-696.
Yen, Y. Y., Chung, K. C., &; Shiue, F. J. (2009). The Performance Pattern of Investments in China: Evidence from Electronics Firms. Journal of Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences, 38, 431-447.
Yu, C. M. J., &; Ito, K. (1988). Oligopolistic reaction and foreign direct investment: The case of the US tire and textiles industries. Journal of International Business Studies, 449-460.
Zou, S., &; Cavusgil, S. T. (2002). The GMS: A broad conceptualization of global marketing strategy and its effect on firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 40-56.

電子全文 電子全文(本篇電子全文限研究生所屬學校校內系統及IP範圍內開放)
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top