臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

個人電腦技術引發PC世代，開啟全球PC市場。為推動此一技術發展，包括有遠見的技術者、市場情報分析者、產業顧問與專利專家齊聚一堂。為了達到市場需求，產銷供應鏈被拆解為設計，製造，品牌與銷售渠道。在此一產業鏈中，ODM/OEM已成為一個通用常見的組合，ODM負責將概念性的規格，調適到可量產的程度，而OEM則負責製造的部分。回顧PC產業興起初期，台灣ODM在將概念規格轉換為量產產品上，扮演重要的角色，高度主導設計決定權以及製造流程，ODM/OEM兩者之間協同作戰，獲取巨大利益。但當產品與零件越來越成熟與標準化後，OEM對於ODM設計創新的需求逐步降低，隨之利潤也大幅降低。

也就於此十數年間，網際網路以及移動上網的普及，以美國為主的網際網路創新模式不斷演進與改善、全球經濟高度動盪、中國營運成本持續升高，創新產品獲取的利潤高度集中(如Apple，三星獲取智慧型手機大部利潤)，生產規模高度集中(如鴻海，廣達)，少數領先廠商掌握大部利潤。大部分ODM/OEM企業因創新不及，差異化不足，導致產能過剩，削價競爭亦無所獲。台灣的ICT ODM/OEM商業模式在歷經數十年的成功發展，卻在近十年發展成為勞力密集、規模龐大、利潤急遽衰退的困境。

面對ICT產業巨大的利潤衰退，ODM/OEM商業模式的發展面臨前所未有的衝擊以及在推動創新時產生了兩難困境。其中兩難主要源於企業必須同時確保維持數以萬計的員工生計的前提下，OEM(本研究也稱此為主流組織)擔任著cash cow角色，期望ODM(本研究也稱此為創新組織)的設計與創新，能為掌握未來趨勢與提高客戶創新價值提出貢獻；但是新興的創新客戶除了掌握市場，更緊抓設計，控制大部創價環節，導致ODM團隊越來越缺少市場情報與終端回饋，並缺乏創新環境與模式，難以提供創新價值給OEM，因此形成了兩難的困境。

本研究將基於網際網路及行動上網普及、EC銷售模式之逐漸成熟，為ODM/OEM商業模式再創新，設計一新穎及可行的理論模型，建立開啟創新產品獨立運作與發展的孵化環境，最終與OEM合作創新主流市場，跳脫ODM/OEM現有之兩難困境。

創新組織與主流組織之價值網路定義，也是企業同時推動兩種商業模式時，是否陷入兩難的關鍵因子，這也會在本研究中有深入探討。

The personal computing technology advances triggered the PC era, and opened up the global PC market. To promote the technology advance, there are technology visionaries, industry information analysts, industry consortiums, and patent players coming into play. To meet the global demands, the supply chain is then decomposed into design, manufacturing, brand, and channels for mass production.

In global PC industry, the ODM/OEM has been a common practice for PC manufacturing, where ODM and OEM are the abbreviations of Original Design Manufacturing, and Original Equipment Manufacturing. ODM is responsible for turning conceptual specifications into feasible design for manufacturing. And OEM is response for the equipment manufacturing.

In the global ICT Industry, the ODM/OEM plays important roles in the design-in and manufacturing processes. Initially, the ODM/OEM collaborates smoothly, and jointly makes the mass production of ICT products, such as personal computers, feasible. While more and more components are designed with plug-and-play compatibility, less and less the design-in works are needed for ODM to co-work with OEM. The ODM/OEM profit margins hence dropped dramatically in the last 10 years.

In past ten years, the mobile Internet keep evolution and mainly leading by US entrepreneurs’ innovation, the global economic tsunami, China’s operation cost keep raising, the few innovative firms grabbed most of profits (e.g. Apple and Samsung share the more than 90% of profits from global smartphone market in 2012/2013); ODM/OEM lacks of innovation/differentiation result in only few companies (Foxconn and Quanta) shared most of revenue of ICT industry. As well as causing market oversupply and price war everywhere. Taiwan ODM/OEM business model has been challenged to be sustainable and we have to think about why and what the root causes are, and how to re-invent the ODM/OEM business model from the dilemma.

Facing the dilemma, Taiwan’s ODM/OEM has to sustain the existing business, in order to keep maintaining the couple ten thousands of employees operation and surviving. OEM team plays as the role of cash cow and look forward to having the innovation products from ODM team. On the other hand, the ODM team can’t access the market to get the real needs due to most of innovative customers’ control not only the market/sales but also the design activities without ODM’s involve. So the ODM team can contribute nothing to the OEM team gradually. This causes the dilemma.
The rise of e-commerce opens up an opportunity for ODM to build up innovative products, to grow up as a strong independent organization, and again to collaborate with OEM. This paper shows the steps for ODM/OEM’s business model re-invent. The re-invented business model then resolves the original ODM/OEM dilemma.

The value network of organizations will be addressed in this thesis, because of this is one of key factor to success or fail when firms deploy disruptive and sustainable business models at the same time.

誌 謝 iv
中文摘要 v
THESIS ABSTRACT vi
表目錄 x
第一章 緒 論 1
第一節、 問題陳述 1
第二節、 研究目的 3
第三節、 研究方法 – 以六標準差DMAIC為手法及步驟 4
第四節、 論文結構 6
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節、 《Ｓ曲線》Innovation: The Attacker’s Advantage 8
第二節、 《創新的兩難》The Innovator''s Dilemma 9
第三節、 A Novel Value Creation Cycle & Business Model for Designer Entrepreneurs 11
第四節、 VCC-VEPS and CMCP 15
第五節、 Six Sigma – DMAIC 16
第三章 ODM/OEM發展瓶頸與創新實例與困境 17
第一節、 界定：台灣主流ODM/OEM商業模式現況及發展困境之兩難 17
第二節、 衡量：台灣ODM/OEM商業模式創新之實例與其困境探討 26
第四章 跳脫創新兩難的方法–優化VCC模型 30
第一節、 華碩EeePC的發展背景與歷程 32
第二節、 分析：以VCC – VEPS，CMCP分析華碩EeePC的成功過程 33
第三節、 以VCC探討華碩EeePC於2012年宣布退出市場之困境原因 37
第四節、 改善：設計一客製化VCC模型 - ODM/OEM突破創新困境之方法 39
第五節、 控制：優化VCC模型之運作 - 模擬案例分析 41
第六節、 解決兩難困境-優化VCC模式與創新價值觀 45
第五章 研究結論 47
第一節、 ODM/OEM推動創新的困境 - 兩難 47
第二節、 ODM/OEM推動創新，跳脫兩難困境的解答 48
參考文獻 50
附錄 51

1.Clayton M. Christensen, 2000, The Innovator’s
Dilemma
2.Richard N. Foster, 1986, Innovation: The
Attacker’s Advantage
3.Lance Whitney, 2012, Apple, Samsung put
hammerlock on smartphone profits, CNET
4.MIC產業研究報告, 2010, 2009年迷你筆電市場展望與規
模分析
5.MIC產業研究報告, 2010, Acer與Asus之Mobile PC市場發
展策略分析
6.MIC產業研究報告, 2010, 剖析2010平板電腦發展擴大檢
視平板電腦的歷史與型式
7.Peter Pande, Robert Neuman, & Roland Cavanagh,
2001, The Six Sigma Way
8.Udn研究報告, 2012, 台廠雙i利潤超低, 蘋果公布供應商
一覽, 全文網址:
http://money.udn.com/report/storypage.jsp?
f_ART_ID=255995#ixzz2UPIbS1U3
9.李融冠, 2010, 低價簡易PC對主流產品之影響探討以Eee-
PC為例, 元智大學管理研究所
10.林曉芳, 1999,產品/服務發展及經營模式設計之研究-以
系統觀點論華碩Eee PC之發展, 中央大學資訊管理研究所
11.符銘財, 2012, OEM、ODM模式亟待檢討, 渣打銀行首席經
濟學家2012.11
12.游張松, 2012, A Novel Value Creation Cycle &
Business Model for Designer Entrepreneurs, Global
Business & International Management Conference,
Aug 2012, Portland OR, USA.
13.游張松, 2012, Apple’s VCC vs. HTC, Samsung,
Class Note of Business Model Revolution
14.蕭富元與王曉玟, 2010, 產學創新大師交鋒-台灣的利
基, 在賣子彈, 天下雜誌451