跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.240) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/06/13 09:04
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:杜沛穎
研究生(外文):Pei-Ying Tu
論文名稱:中國改採管理式浮動匯率制度對其紡織服裝業股票報酬的影響
論文名稱(外文):The Impact of Changing into Managed Floating Exchange Rate System on the Stock Returns for China Textiles and Clothes Industry
指導教授:鄭美幸鄭美幸引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:南台科技大學
系所名稱:國際企業系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:中文
論文頁數:69
中文關鍵詞:匯率制度紡織服裝業超常報酬人民幣
外文關鍵詞:Exchange Rate Regime、Textile Clothing Industry、Abnormal Returns、Renmibi
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:215
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
過去幾年,人民幣一直被質疑有嚴重低估的現象,而中國也在飽受各界的輿論及壓力後,遂於2005年7月21日宣布改採管理式浮動匯率制度。此一匯率制度的改變造成人民幣升值2%,為1美元兌換8.11元人民幣,預期將對中國的經濟結構,以及各行業的資產、負債、收入與成本等將產生影響。其中,對出口導向的紡織服裝業來說,衝擊應該是無可避免的。
因此,本研究以2004年7月23日至2006年7月21日之深圳證券交易所紡織服裝業指數為研究對象,應用多元迴歸模型進一步分析中國於2005年7月改採管理式浮動匯率制度對其紡織服裝業的影響。實證結果發現,中國改採管理式浮動匯率制度後,紡織服裝業的超常報酬顯著高於匯率制度改變之前的超常報酬,而此結果與傳統理論的預期不符。因為紡織服裝業的出口依存度甚高,人民幣的升值對出口服裝業而言屬於負面效果,理應使紡織服裝產業的超常報酬降低,但本研究卻發現匯率制度改變後,反而有顯著較高的超常報酬。為檢驗此一現象是否是因為紡織服裝業出口高度成長的正面效應抵銷了匯率制度改變的負面效果,本研究進一步將(淨)出口額納入模型中分析。在控制了(淨)出口額之效果後,本研究仍然得到相同的結果:改變匯率制度之後的超常報酬顯著高於改變前的超常報酬。因此,本研究所提供的證據顯示,中國改採管理式浮動匯率制度對其紡織服裝業之上市公司並未造成負面的影響,而這個結果似乎與中國政府對於人民幣的鬆綁速度緩慢有關。
Renminbi was seriously underestimated in recent years. Under pressure and public opinion, China started using managed floating exchange rate regime since July 2005. This new exchange rate regime caused Renminbi to appreciate for 2%, and changed the official USD/RMB exchange rate to 8.11. It is expected that the new exchange rate regime will affect the economic structure of China and the assets, debts and cost of all industries. The textile clothing industry, which is a highly export-oriented industry, will affected undoubtedly by this change.
The samples of textile clothing industry stock index of this study were drawn from Shenzhen Stock Exchange. We used a Multiple Regression Model to examine the influence caused by that China started using managed floating exchange rate regime since July 2005 on its textile clothing industry. The empirical result came out differently, the abnormal returns of textile clothing industry are surprisingly a lot higher than before due to managed floating exchange rate regime. The textile clothing industry is a highly export-oriented industry, so the appreciation of Renminbi should have a negative effect on textile clothing industry, but the outcome is completely different. To try figuring out why the outcome is completely different from everybody expected, we further put the export value and the net export value into the model. But the result is the same: the abnormal returns of textile clothing industry are significantly higher after the introduction of managed floating exchange rate regime. The evidence of this research reveals that the adoption of managed floating exchange rate regime in China does not bring any negative influence over those listed companies of textile clothing industry, and this result seems to be related to the untying speed of Renmibi from Chinese government.
摘要................................................................iv
英文摘要.............................................................v
誌謝................................................................vi
目次...............................................................vii
表目錄..............................................................ix
圖目錄...............................................................x
第一章 緒論..........................................................1
1.1 研究動機與目的...............................................1
1.2 論文架構....................................................3
1.3 研究程序....................................................4
第二章 中國的外匯管理體制及其紡織服裝業.................................5
2.1中國外匯管理體制的變遷.........................................5
2.1.1 1949年至1980年的外匯管理體制............................6
2.1.2 1981年至1993年的外匯管理體..............................9
2.1.3 1994年至2005上半年的外匯管理體.........................11
2.1.4 2005年7月21日後至今的外匯管理體........................12
2.2 中國紡織服裝業的概況........................................14
2.3 中國紡織服裝業的機會與威脅...................................16
2.3.1 機會.................................................16
2.3.2 威脅.................................................17
2.4 中國紡織服裝業的內需時代....................................20
第三章 文獻探討.....................................................21
3.1匯率波動及風險對進出口貿易的影響...............................21
3.1.1 中文文獻.............................................21
3.1.2 西文文獻.............................................25
3.1.3 小結.................................................28
3.2匯率波動對股票報酬或股票價格的影響..............................29
3.2.1 中文文獻.............................................29
3.2.2 西文文獻.............................................32
3.2.3 小結.................................................34
第四章 研究方法.....................................................36
4.1資料來源....................................................36
4.1.1 樣本選取及來源........................................36
4.1.2 月資料轉換日資料之方法.................................36
4.2超常報酬之估計...............................................38
4.2.1 市場模式.............................................38
4.2.2 市場指數調整模式......................................39
4.2.3 Dimson模式...........................................39
4.3單根檢定....................................................40
4.4迴歸模型....................................................42
4.5修正的迴歸模型...............................................43
4.5.1 加入出口額的修正迴歸模型...............................43
4.5.2 加入淨出口額的修正迴歸模型..............................44
第五章 實證結果.....................................................45
5.1敘述統計分析結果.............................................45
5.2迴歸分析結果.................................................49
5.3修正的迴歸分析結果............................................52
第六章 結論與建議 ...................................................55
6.1結論........................................................55
6.2後續建議....................................................56
參考文獻............................................................57
附錄................................................................61
1.許振銘,貨幣銀行學,台北市,華泰文化事業股份有限公司,民國84年。
2.萬哲鈺,國際金融(四),台北市,雙葉有限公司,民國94年。
3.方文碩,2000,金融危機期間股票報酬風險貼水與貶值效果,風險管理學報,2(1):39-68。
4.方文碩、賴奕豪,2001,匯率風險對出口貿易之衝擊,臺灣金融財務季刊,2(1):83-101。
5.方文碩、張倉耀、葉志權,2005,匯率貶值及其風險與出口,經濟研究,41(1):105-139。
6.王春平、劉傳哲,2007,人民幣實際有效匯率變動對山東出口貿易影響,山東社會科學,2:102-105。
7.李雙燕、趙文武,2005,中國紡織服裝的國際競爭力研究,中原工學院學報,16(5):30-33。
8.林基煌、徐政義,2004,東亞地區新興市場匯率與股價指數之關係-金融風暴前後的實證分析,中華管理學報,5(1):23-39。
9.胥愛琦、吳清豐,2003,台灣股市報酬與匯率變動之波動性外溢效果─雙變量EGARCH模型的應用,臺灣金融財務季刊,4(3):87-103。
10.徐明東,2007,人民幣實際匯率變動對我國進出口貿易影響:1997-2006,財經科學,2007(5):110-117。
11.馬帥,2007,人民幣匯率實際變動對我國進出口貿易的影響分析,金融經濟,2007(10B):21-23。
12.馬麟艷、肖留春,2007,人民幣實際匯率變動與雲南進出口的實證研究,雲南財貿學院學報,22(1):34-35。
13.陳美玲、王凱立、吳家豪,2004,台灣對外直接投資、出口及匯率動態關聯之研究:多變量時間序列模型之應用,農業經濟半年刊,76:109-143。

14.陳龍江、黃祖輝,2007,人民幣匯率變動對浙江農產品出口的影響:實證檢驗與政策含義,浙江社會科學, 2007(5):38-44。
15.黃明棋,2007,成交量與匯率波動率對股票市場報酬之衝擊:以南韓股票市場報酬為例,東亞論壇季刊,458:67-84。
16.黃明棋、洪萬吉,2007,美元波動對台灣機電類股票報酬之動態關聯性分析:雙變數IGARCH模型之應用,嘉南學報,33:237-251。
17.葉春霜、胡丹婷,2007,匯率變動影響中國對美紡織品出口的實證研究,浙江理工大學學報,24(3):283-287。
18.萬紅先、郭曉瑾,2007,實際匯率變動對我國進出口貿易的影響,安徽廣播電視大學學報,2007(2):33-38。
19.潘雅瓊,2007,人民幣匯率變動對湖北省貿易流量影響的實證,統計與決策,2007(21):121-123。
20.鄭婉秀、吳佩珊、陳君達、陳玉瓏,2005,貨幣政策、匯率與股價關連性之探討:GARCH-IRF模型之應用,朝陽商管評論,4(2):73-92。
21.陳麗珍,2006,企業外匯風險暴露:以新興市場為例,桃園縣:元智大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
22.Arize, A. C. 1997. Foreign Trade and Exchange-Rate Risk in the G-7 Countries: Cointegration and Error-Correction Models, Review of Financial Economics, 6(1), 95-112.
23.Arize, A. C., Osang, T., & Slottje, D. J. 2000. Exchange-Rate Volatility and Foreign Trade: Evidence from Thirteen LDC’s, Journal of Business and Economics Statistics, 18(1), 10-17.
24.Asseery, A., & D. A. Peel. 1991. The Effects of Exchange Rate Volatility on Exports: Some New Estimates, Economics Letters, 37,173-177.
25.Ajayi, R. A., & Mougoue, M. 1996. On the Dynamic Relation between Stock Price and Exchange Rates, Journal of Financial Research, 9(2), 193-207.
26.Bodnar, G. M., & Gentry, W. M. 1993. Exchange Rate Exposure and Industry Characteristics: Evidence from Canada, Japan and the UAS, Journal of International Money and Finance, 12(1), 29-45.
27.Chen, Nai-Fu., Roll, R., & Ross, S. A. 1986. Economic forces and the stock market, Journal of Business, 59(3), 383-403.
28.Chowdhury, A. R. 1993. Does Exchange Rate Volatility Depress Trade Flows? Evidence From Error-Correction Models, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 75(4), 700-706.
29.Dellas, H., & Zilberfarb, B. Z. 1993. Real Exchange Rate Volatility and International Trade: A Reexamination of the Theory, Southern Economic Journal, 59, 641-647.
30.Jorion, P. 1990. The Exchange Rate Exposure of U.S. Multi-nation, Journal of Business, 63(3), 331-345.
31.Jorion, P. 1991. The Pricing of Exchange Rate Risk in the Stock Market, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26(3), 363-376.
32.Kim, K., & Lee, W. 1996, The Impact of Korea’s Exchange Rate Volatility on Korean Trade, Asian Economic Journal, 10(1), 45-60.
33.Koray, F., & Lastrapes, W. D. 1989. Real Exchange Rate Volatility and U.S. Bilateral Trade: A Var Approach, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(4), 708-712.
34.Koutoulas, G., & Kryzanowski, L. 1996. Macrofactor conditional volatility, time-varying risk premia and stock return behavior, Financial Review, 31(1),169-195.
35.Kwon, C. S. & Shin. S. T. 1997. The Effect of Macroeconomic Variables on Stock Market Returns in Developing Markets, Multinational Business Review, 5(2), 63-70.
36.Kearney, C. 1998. The Causes of Volatility in a Small, Internationally Integrated Stock Market: Ireland,July 1975-June 1994, Journal of Financial Research, 21(1), 85-104.
37.Luc, A. S., & Hennigar, E. S. 1988. An analysis of exchange rates and stock prices-the U.S. experience between 1980 and 1986, Akron Business and Economic Review (ABER), 19, 7-16.
38.Mandelker, G. & K. Tandon., “Common Stock Returns, Real Activity, Money and Inflation: Some International Evidence,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 4(2), 267-286(1985).
39.Mckenzie, M. D., & Brooks, R. D. 1997. The Impact of Exchange Rate Volatility on German-U.S. Trade Flow, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 7, 73-87.
40.Mckenzie, M. D., 1998, The impact of exchange rate volatility on Australian trade flows, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 8, 21-38.
41.Ma, C. K., & Kao, G. W. 1990. On Exchange Rate Changes and Stock Price Reactions, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 17(3), 441-449.
42.Pozo, S. 1992. Conditional Exchange-Rate Volatility and the Volume of International Trade: Evidence from the Early 1990s, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(2), 325-329.
43.Ratner, M, 1993. A Cointegration Test of the Impact of Foreign Exchange Rates on U.S. Stock Market Prices, Global Finance Journal, 4(2), 93-101.
44.Sukar, A. H., & Hassan, S. 2001. US Exports and Time-Varying Volatility of Real Exchange Rate, Global Finance Journal, 12, 109-119.
45.Solnik, B. 1987. Using Financial Prices to Test Exchange Rate Models: A Note, Journal of Finance, 42(1), 141-149.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top