臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

吃——味覺即品味，與建築關係甚深。而且相較於凝視，吃這個動作更具有侵略性與危險性。吃與保護、生存有關，而攝取往往帶來巨大的安全感。我們對於瘟疫的疲倦與恐懼，召回對於建築的原始解讀。歷史上的瘟疫是各有不同的，但人的反應是一致的。以影爲引，隔離與危險同等意義。若我們抛開純粹視覺爲主的思考方式，而考慮以味覺思考建築，會有什麽樣的考量與轉變？而建築能否引起食欲？人是否吃建築的獸，又還是建築作爲吃人的獸而誕生？

Eating - sense of taste is “taste”, and it is closely related to architecture. And compared to staring, eating is more aggressive and dangerous. Eating is related to protection and survival, and ingestion often brings a great sense of security. Our fatigue and fear of the plague recalls our original interpretation of architecture. Plagues in history are different, but people’s responses are the same. Using shadow as an introduction, then isolation and danger have the same meaning. If we abandon the purely visual way of thinking and instead consider thinking about architecture through taste. What kind of considerations and changes will there be? And can architecture whet the appetite? Is man a beast that eats architecture, or is architecture born as a beast that eats people?

摘要 3
序 5
影子的階段 10
咀嚼間 22
内部的吞嚥 34
飢餓的内部 42
尚饗 64
展覽及評圖記錄 117
參考文獻 125

中文文獻：
1.布朗肖：《文學空間》北京：商務印書館，2003。
2.列維-斯特勞斯：《嫉妒的制陶女》北京：中國人民大學出版社，2006。
3.江紹原：《民俗與迷信》北京：北京出版社，2016。
4.努喬‧奧爾迪內：《影子的門檻︰布魯諾筆下的文學、哲學和繪畫》北京：東方出版社，2009。
5.巫鴻：《黃泉下的藝術》北京：生活·讀書·新知三聯書店，2010。
6.翁托南．阿鐸：《劇場及其複象》臺北：聯經出版公司，2003。
7.貢華南：《味與味道》上海：人民出版社，2008。
8.張載：《張載集》中國：中華書局，2006。
9.斯托伊奇塔：《影子簡史》北京: 商務印書館，2013。
10.菲立普‧費南德茲-阿梅斯托：《食物的歷史》臺北：左岸文化，2005。
11.詹姆斯·乔治·弗雷泽：《金枝》陝西師範大學出版社，2010。
12.黛安．艾克曼：《感官之旅：感知的詩學》臺灣：時報出版，2007。

英文文獻：
1.Donald Kunze (1990). Skiagraphy and the Ipsum of Architecture. The Journal of the Graduate School of Fine Arts, VIA 11, 62-75.
2.Donald Kunze(1994). Architecture as Site of Reception - Part I: Cuisine, Frontality, and the Infra-thin. Chora 1: Intervals in the Philosophy of Architecture. Ed. Alberto Pérez-Gómez & Stephen Parcell. McGill-Queen’s University Press, 83-108.
3.Donald Kunze(1996). Architecture as Site of Reception. Part II: Sea-Food and Vampires. Chora 1: Intervals in the Philosophy of Architecture. Ed. Alberto Pérez-Gómez & Stephen Parcell. McGill-Queen’s University Press, 109-134.
4.Jamie Horwitz, & Paulette Singley (Eds.). (2006). Eating Architecture. The MIT Press.
5.Luke Morgan. (2016). The Monster in the Garden: The Grotesque and the Gigantic in Renaissance Landscape Design. University of Pennsylvania Press.
6.Marco Frascari (1990). A Secret Semiotic Skiagraphy: The Corporeal Theater of Meanings In Vincenzo Scamozzi's Idea of Architecture. The Journal of the Graduate School of Fine Arts, VIA 11, 32-51.
7.Payne, Alina.（2013）Living Stones, Crying Walls: The Dangers of Enlivenment in Architecture from Renaissance putti to Warburg’s Nachleben. Art and Agency. The Secret Lives of Artworks. Ed. Caroline van Eck. Leiden: Leiden University Press, 301-32.

網路資料：
1.Ivan Day. (2012, June 9). Culinary Slapstick. Food History Jottings. http://foodhistorjottings.blogspot.com/2012/06/culinary-japes-and-wheezes.html
2.Linda Bleijenberg. (2012, December 28). Origin Myths in Renaissance Vitruvius Editions: A Gallery. WordPress.Com. https://originsofarchitecture.wordpress.com/2012/12/28/origin-myths-in-renaissance-vitruvius-editions/
3.Mariabruna Fabrizi. (2019, March 3). Spatializing Knowledge: Giulio Camillo’s Theatre of Memory (1519-1544). SOCKS. https://socks-studio.com/2019/03/03/spatializing-knowledge-giulio-camillos-theatre-of-memory-1519-1544/